A Stochastic ANP-GCE Approach for Vulnerability Assessment in the Water Supply System With Uncertainties

Water supply systems around the world are becoming increasingly vulnerable as a consequence of rising climate instability and the systems' intrinsic complexity. Assessing the vulnerability of such systems is the primary and fundamental step for mitigating the negative impacts of environmental incidents. There are two main challenges in this context. First, since water supply systems are coupled with human-environment systems, the corresponding vulnerability assessment requires consideration of a host of multidimensional criteria in terms of the structures and management. Second, due to the uncertain and dynamic nature of environmental incidents, available information is not sufficient for experts to make accurate real-time judgments for the weights of criteria. To the best of our knowledge, few weight calculation approaches are able to deal with both uncertainties and subjectivities of experts' judgments under varied scenarios of the incident. These problems are solved by developing new assessment approaches consisting of four steps: 1) developing an analytical network process (ANP) criteria framework; 2) proposing a weight calculation approach by integrating game cross evaluation with stochastic ANP based on the proposed criteria framework; 3) calculating the weighted vulnerability values, rating and visualizing the vulnerability grades accordingly; and 4) performing assessment simulations and sensitivity analysis for possible scenarios. A case study of the Shanghai water supply system demonstrates the effectiveness of the proposed approaches, which provides guides for improvement of system performances based on the trends of variations in the vulnerability grades and the dominating criterion identified for each component.

[1]  Luis G. Vargas,et al.  Uncertainty and rank order in the analytic hierarchy process , 1987 .

[2]  R. Dyson,et al.  Reducing Weight Flexibility in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1988 .

[3]  Jose Emmanuel Ramirez-Marquez,et al.  A generic method for estimating system reliability using Bayesian networks , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[4]  Barry Charles Ezell,et al.  Infrastructure Vulnerability Assessment Model (I‐VAM) , 2007, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[5]  Jin-Yong Choi,et al.  Development of an irrigation vulnerability assessment model in agricultural reservoirs utilizing probability theory and reliability analysis , 2014 .

[6]  M. Pelling Disaster risk reduction : a development concern , 2004 .

[7]  Luis A. Bojórquez-Tapia,et al.  Insights into the composition of household vulnerability from multicriteria decision analysis , 2008 .

[8]  Ivy Ong Bee Luan Singapore Water Management Policies and Practices , 2010 .

[9]  L. C. Leung,et al.  On consistency and ranking of alternatives in fuzzy AHP , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[10]  Jiju Antony,et al.  Application of stochastic analytic hierarchy process within a domestic appliance manufacturer , 2007, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[11]  Ilker Akgun,et al.  Fuzzy integrated vulnerability assessment model for critical facilities in combating the terrorism , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[12]  Thomas L. Saaty What is the analytic hierarchy process , 1988 .

[13]  Ahti Salo,et al.  On fuzzy ratio comparisons in hierarchical decision models , 1996, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[14]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Time dependent decision-making; dynamic priorities in the AHP/ANP: Generalizing from points to functions and from real to complex variables , 2007, Math. Comput. Model..

[15]  Jean-Claude Laprie,et al.  Modelling Interdependencies Between the Electricity and Information Infrastructures , 2007, SAFECOMP.

[16]  Terje Aven,et al.  On Some Recent Definitions and Analysis Frameworks for Risk, Vulnerability, and Resilience , 2011, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[17]  W. Pedrycz,et al.  A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory , 1983 .

[18]  Jie Wu,et al.  The DEA Game Cross-Efficiency Model and Its Nash Equilibrium , 2008, Oper. Res..

[19]  Juan Carlos,et al.  Vulnerability: a conceptional and methodological review , 2006 .

[20]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Interval weight generation approaches based on consistency test and interval comparison matrices , 2005, Appl. Math. Comput..

[21]  J. Rezaei Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method , 2015 .

[22]  S Sultana,et al.  Modeling flood induced interdependencies among hydroelectricity generating infrastructures. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[23]  Willy Bauwens,et al.  Sobol' sensitivity analysis of a complex environmental model , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[24]  R. A. Becker,et al.  Satisficing behavior, Brouwer’s Fixed Point Theorem and Nash Equilibrium , 2005 .

[25]  K. Nagel,et al.  Measuring vulnerability to promote disaster-resilient societies: Conceptual frameworks and definitions , 2006 .

[26]  Arika Ligmann-Zielinska,et al.  Spatially-explicit integrated uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of criteria weights in multicriteria land suitability evaluation , 2014, Environ. Model. Softw..

[27]  Min Ouyang,et al.  Comparisons of complex network based models and real train flow model to analyze Chinese railway vulnerability , 2014, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[28]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Network Process: Decision Making With Dependence and Feedback , 2001 .

[29]  Huayou Chen,et al.  Uncertain linguistic fuzzy soft sets and their applications in group decision making , 2015, Appl. Soft Comput..

[30]  Alan T. Murray An overview of network vulnerability modeling approaches , 2013 .

[31]  Wenjun Chris Zhang,et al.  A novel approach to probability distribution aggregation , 2012, Inf. Sci..

[32]  Joaquín Izquierdo,et al.  An approach to AHP decision in a dynamic context , 2012, Decis. Support Syst..

[33]  Franco Caron,et al.  Multi-criteria assessment of the probability of winning in the competitive bidding process , 2001 .

[34]  Bi Yu Chen,et al.  Vulnerability analysis for large-scale and congested road networks with demand uncertainty , 2012 .

[35]  Alessio Ishizaka,et al.  Analytic network process , 2013 .

[36]  Andrew Schiller,et al.  The vulnerability of global cities to climate hazards , 2007 .

[37]  Peijun Guo,et al.  Fuzzy DEA: a perceptual evaluation method , 2001, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[38]  C. Tortajada,et al.  Water Management in Singapore , 2006 .

[39]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Uncertain Multi-Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications , 2015 .

[40]  Teresa Wu,et al.  A stochastic AHP decision making methodology for imprecise preferences , 2014, Inf. Sci..