Sparking Creativity: Improving Electronic Brainstorming with Individual Cognitive Priming

Much of human behavior involves subconscious cognition that can be manipulated through "priming"—the presentation of a stimulus designed to subconsciously implant a concept in working memory that alters subsequent behavior. Priming is a well-known phenomenon for individual behavior, but we do not know whether priming can be used to influence group behavior. We developed a Web-based computer game that was designed to improve creativity through priming. Participants were exposed to a priming game and then worked as members of a group using electronic brainstorming (EBS) to generate ideas on a creativity task. Our results show that when users played the game, designed to improve performance, their groups generated significantly more ideas that were more creative than when they were exposed to neutral priming. Our findings extend the literature by providing evidence that individual priming substantially affects group idea generation performance. Avenues for future research include designing EBS software that optimizes group ideation through priming, examining the conditions under which priming has the most substantial impact on ideation performance, and examining whether priming can be used to enhance other group processes (e.g., convergence tasks).

[1]  A. Osborn Applied imagination : principles and procedures of creative problem-solving , 1957 .

[2]  C. N. Cofer,et al.  Conditions for the use of verbal associations. , 1967, Psychological bulletin.

[3]  M. Scheerer,et al.  Problem Solving , 1967, Nature.

[4]  E. Ramsden Group Process and Productivity , 1973 .

[5]  W. S. Rholes,et al.  Category accessibility and impression formation , 1977 .

[6]  T. K. Srull,et al.  The Role of Category Accessibility in the Interpretation of Information About Persons: Some Determinants and Implications , 1979 .

[7]  David M. Sanbonmatsu,et al.  On the automatic activation of attitudes. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  M. Diehl,et al.  Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. , 1987 .

[9]  C. Burgess,et al.  Lexical and Sentence Context Effects in Word Recognition , 1989 .

[10]  Shoshana Zuboff,et al.  In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power , 1989 .

[11]  J. Valacich,et al.  Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups , 1990 .

[12]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Electronic meeting systems , 1991, CACM.

[13]  J. Bargh The ecology of automaticity: toward establishing the conditions needed to produce automatic processing effects. , 1992, The American journal of psychology.

[14]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  ELECTRONIC BRAINSTORMING AND GROUP SIZE , 1992 .

[15]  L. Squire Declarative and Nondeclarative Memory: Multiple Brain Systems Supporting Learning and Memory , 1992, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[16]  J. Valacich,et al.  Computer brainstorms: More heads are better than one. , 1993 .

[17]  Terence Connolly,et al.  On the Effectiveness of Group Brainstorming , 1993 .

[18]  A. Dennis,et al.  When a Group Is Not a Group , 1993 .

[19]  J. Bargh,et al.  Automaticity of social behavior: direct effects of trait construct and stereotype-activation on action. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Invoking Social Comparison to Improve Electronic Brainstorming: Beyond Anonymity , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[21]  Andrew B. Hargadon,et al.  Brainstorming groups in context: Effectiveness in a product design firm , 1996 .

[22]  Robert O. Briggs,et al.  Quality as a function of quantity in electronic brainstorming , 1997, Proceedings of the Thirtieth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[23]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Lessons from a Dozen Years of Group Support Systems Research: A Discussion of Lab and Field Findings , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[24]  D A Haaga,et al.  Priming irrational beliefs in recovered-depressed people. , 1998, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[25]  D. Schacter,et al.  Priming and the Brain , 1998, Neuron.

[26]  Robert K. Kazanjian,et al.  Multilevel Theorizing about Creativity in Organizations: A Sensemaking Perspective , 1999 .

[27]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Research Note. Electronic Brainstorming: Illusions and Patterns of Productivity , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[28]  Alain Pinsonneault,et al.  Electronic Brainstorming: The Illusion of Productivity , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[29]  T. Chartrand,et al.  THE UNBEARABLE AUTOMATICITY OF BEING , 1999 .

[30]  M. Bradley,et al.  Affective Norms for English Words (ANEW): Instruction Manual and Affective Ratings , 1999 .

[31]  M. Lucas,et al.  Semantic priming without association: A meta-analytic review , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[32]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Technology Adaptation: The Case of a Computer-Supported Inter-Organizational Virtual Team , 2000, MIS Q..

[33]  T. Chartrand,et al.  The mind in the middle: A practical guide to priming and automaticity research. , 2000 .

[34]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Technology adaption: the case of a computer-supported inter-organizational virtual team 1 , 2000 .

[35]  P. Paulus,et al.  Idea Generation in Groups : A Basis for Creativity in Organizations , 1994 .

[36]  Adam D. Galinsky,et al.  Counterfactuals as behavioral primes: Priming the simulation heuristic and consideration of alternatives. , 2000 .

[37]  Monica J. Garfield,et al.  Modifying Paradigms: Individual Differences, Creativity Techniques and Exposure to Ideas in Group Idea Generation , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[38]  A. Pinsonneault,et al.  Small Group Brainstorming and Idea Quality , 2001 .

[39]  J. Bargh,et al.  The automated will: nonconscious activation and pursuit of behavioral goals. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[40]  T. Postmes,et al.  Social Influence in Computer-Mediated Communication: The Effects of Anonymity on Group Behavior , 2001 .

[41]  Tanya L. Chartrand,et al.  Automatic Activation of Impression Formation and Memorization Goals: Nonconscious Goal Priming Reproduces Effects of Explicit Task Instructions , 1996 .

[42]  Alex Martin,et al.  Semantic memory and the brain: structure and processes , 2001, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[43]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Investigating the Moderators of the Group Support Systems Use with Meta-Analysis , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[44]  John A. Bargh,et al.  Losing Consciousness: Automatic Influences on Consumer Judgment, Behavior, and Motivation , 2002 .

[45]  Edwin H. Blake,et al.  Conceptual priming as a determinant of presence in virtual environments , 2003, AFRIGRAPH '03.

[46]  Lorraine K. Tyler,et al.  Objects and their actions: evidence for a neurally distributed semantic system , 2003, NeuroImage.

[47]  X. Drèze,et al.  Internet advertising: Is anybody watching? , 2003 .

[48]  Heather M. Claypool,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Priming Effects on Impression Formation Supporting a General Model of Informational Biases , 2004, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[49]  Mei Lu,et al.  How virtual are we? Measuring virtuality and understanding its impact in a global organization , 2005, Inf. Syst. J..

[50]  Eileen M. Trauth,et al.  Impact of Individual Differences on Web Searching Performance: Issues for Design and the Digital Divide , 2006 .

[51]  Gerry Stahl,et al.  Analyzing and Designing the Group Cognition Experience , 2006, Int. J. Cooperative Inf. Syst..

[52]  Thomas Lee Rodgers,et al.  Identifying Quality, Novel, and Creative Ideas: Constructs and Scales for Idea Evaluation , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[53]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Research Note: Individual Cognition and Dual-Task Interference in Group Support Systems , 2006, Inf. Syst. Res..

[54]  Wolfgang Stroebe,et al.  How the Group Affects the Mind: A Cognitive Model of Idea Generation in Groups , 2006, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[55]  Joseph S. Valacich,et al.  The effects of individual cognitive ability and idea stimulation on idea-generation performance , 2006 .

[56]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  On the Measurement of Ideation Quality , 2007, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[57]  B. Nijstad,et al.  Relative accessibility of domain knowledge and creativity: The effects of knowledge activation on the quantity and originality of generated ideas , 2007 .

[58]  Robert O. Briggs,et al.  Bounded Ideation Theory: A New Model of the Relationship Between Ideaquantity and Idea-quality during Ideation , 2007, 2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07).

[59]  Rebecca Jestice,et al.  Team collaboration in virtual worlds , 2007, DATB.

[60]  Robert O. Briggs,et al.  On The Relationship Between Idea-Quantity and Idea-Quality During Ideation , 2008 .

[61]  Ned Kock,et al.  E-Collaboration and E-Commerce In Virtual Worlds: The Potential of Second Life and World of Warcraft , 2008, Int. J. e Collab..

[62]  Ana Ortiz de Guinea,et al.  Why break the habit of a lifetime? rethinking the roles of intention, habit, and emotion in continuing information technology use , 2009 .

[63]  Likoebe M. Maruping,et al.  Team Size, Dispersion, and Social Loafing in Technology-Supported Teams: A Perspective on the Theory of Moral Disengagement , 2010, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[64]  Claude Frasson,et al.  Showing the Positive Influence of Subliminal Cues on Learner's Performance and Intuition: An ERP Study , 2010, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[65]  Mary J. Culnan,et al.  How Large U.S. Companies Can Use Twitter and Other Social Media to Gain Business Value , 2010, MIS Q. Executive.

[66]  Junghwan Kim,et al.  The Cognitive Selection Framework of Knowledge Acquisition Strategy in Virtual Communities , 2010, HICSS.

[67]  Paul Michael Di Gangi,et al.  Getting Customers' Ideas to Work for You: Learning from Dell how to Succeed with Online User Innovation Communities , 2010, MIS Q. Executive.

[68]  Gwendolyn L. Kolfschoten,et al.  Cognitive Load in Collaboration - Brainstorming , 2011, 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[69]  J. Alberto Espinosa,et al.  The Role of Group Cognition in Enterprise Architecting , 2011, 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[70]  Pedro Antunes,et al.  Developing Collaboration Awareness Support from a Cognitive Perspective , 2011, 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.