Understanding the real behavior of Mote and 802.11 ad hoc networks: an experimental approach

IEEE 802.11 and Mote devices are today two of the most interesting wireless technologies for ad hoc and sensor networks respectively, and many efforts are currently devoted to understanding their potentialities. Unfortunately, few works adopt an experimental approach, though several papers highlight that popular simulation and analytical approximations may lead to very inaccurate results. In this paper we discuss outcomes from an extensive measurement study focused on these technologies. We analyze the dependence of the communication range on several parameters, such as node distance from the ground, transmission data rate, environment humidity. Then, we study the extent of the physical carrier sensing zone around a sending node. On the basis of these elements, we provide a unified wireless link model for both technologies. Finally, by using this model we analyze well-known scenarios (such as the hidden node problem), and we modify the traditional formulations according to our experimental results.

[1]  Giuseppe Anastasi,et al.  Performance measurements of motes sensor networks , 2004, MSWiM '04.

[2]  Mario Gerla,et al.  How effective is the IEEE 802.11 RTS/CTS handshake in ad hoc networks , 2002, Global Telecommunications Conference, 2002. GLOBECOM '02. IEEE.

[3]  Mohammad S. Obaidat,et al.  An accurate line of sight propagation performance model for ad-hoc 802.11 wireless LAN (WLAN) devices , 2002, 2002 IEEE International Conference on Communications. Conference Proceedings. ICC 2002 (Cat. No.02CH37333).

[4]  Giuseppe Anastasi,et al.  IEEE 802.11 AD HOC Networks: Protocols, Performance, and Open Issues , 2004 .

[5]  Koen Langendoen,et al.  Link layer measurements in sensor networks , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Mobile Ad-hoc and Sensor Systems (IEEE Cat. No.04EX975).

[6]  Ivan Stojmenovic,et al.  Ad hoc Networking , 2004 .

[7]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Complex Behavior at Scale: An Experimental Study of Low-Power Wireless Sensor Networks , 2002 .

[8]  David E. Culler,et al.  Lessons from a Sensor Network Expedition , 2004, EWSN.

[9]  Nj Piscataway,et al.  Wireless LAN medium access control (MAC) and physical layer (PHY) specifications , 1996 .

[10]  Ramesh Govindan,et al.  Understanding packet delivery performance in dense wireless sensor networks , 2003, SenSys '03.

[11]  Robert Morris,et al.  Link-level measurements from an 802.11b mesh network , 2004, SIGCOMM 2004.

[12]  Giuseppe Anastasi,et al.  Performance Measurements of Mote Sensor Networks , 2004 .

[13]  Gang Zhou,et al.  Impact of radio irregularity on wireless sensor networks , 2004, MobiSys '04.

[14]  Giuseppe Anastasi,et al.  IEEE 802.11 Ad Hoc Networks: Performance Measurements , 2003, ICDCS Workshops.

[15]  Jason Liu,et al.  Outdoor experimental comparison of four ad hoc routing algorithms , 2004, MSWiM '04.

[16]  Giuseppe Anastasi,et al.  Wi-fi in ad hoc mode: a measurement study , 2004, Second IEEE Annual Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications, 2004. Proceedings of the.

[17]  Nitin H. Vaidya,et al.  On physical carrier sensing in wireless ad hoc networks , 2005, Proceedings IEEE 24th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies..

[18]  David E. Culler,et al.  Taming the underlying challenges of reliable multihop routing in sensor networks , 2003, SenSys '03.

[19]  Voon Chin Phua,et al.  Wireless lan medium access control (mac) and physical layer (phy) specifications , 1999 .

[20]  Jason Liu,et al.  Experimental evaluation of wireless simulation assumptions , 2004, MSWiM '04.

[21]  Mineo Takai,et al.  Effects of wireless physical layer modeling in mobile ad hoc networks , 2001, MobiHoc '01.

[22]  Mineo Takai,et al.  Effects of wireless physical layer modeling in mobile ad hoc networks , 2001, MobiHoc '01.

[23]  Christian F. Tschudin,et al.  The gray zone problem in IEEE 802.11b based ad hoc networks , 2002, MOCO.

[24]  Ramesh Govindan,et al.  Packet Delivery Performance in Dense Wireless Sensor Networks , 2003 .