Orienting to guilty knowledge

The Guilty Knowledge Test (GKT; Lykken, 1959) assesses whether suspects conceal information about a crime ( “guilty knowledge”). Previous studies have demonstrated larger physiological reactions to guilty knowledge compared to unknown information. In three experiments, we investigated whether guilty knowledge also demands attention. During an alleged polygraph examination, participants were presented with to‐be‐detected pictures ( “guilty knowledge”), nonsignificant, familiar pictures ( “mere knowledge”), and previously unseen pictures ( “neutral information”) for 250 ms in a modified dot probe task. In all three experiments, probe responses were slower on guilty knowledge trials as compared to the neutral trials. Results are discussed in terms of an information‐processing view on orienting to guilty knowledge.

[1]  Armand Clercq,et al.  A simple and sensitive method to measure timing accuracy , 2003, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[2]  Heikki Lyytinen,et al.  The Orienting Response in Information Processing , 2002 .

[3]  V. Maclaren,et al.  A quantitative review of the guilty knowledge test. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[4]  Bruno Verschuere,et al.  The international affective picture system: A Flemish validation study , 2001 .

[5]  C M Seifert,et al.  Using response time measures to assess "guilty knowledge". , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[6]  D. Clark,et al.  Social anxiety and attention away from emotional faces , 1999 .

[7]  K. Mogg,et al.  Attentional Bias for Threatening Facial Expressions in Anxiety: Manipulation of Stimulus Duration , 1998 .

[8]  K. Mogg,et al.  A cognitive-motivational analysis of anxiety. , 1998, Behaviour research and therapy.

[9]  G Ben-Shakhar,et al.  The roles of stimulus novelty and significance in determining the electrodermal orienting response: interactive versus additive approaches. , 1994, Psychophysiology.

[10]  M. Dawson,et al.  Probing the orienting response with startle modification and secondary reaction time. , 1994, Psychophysiology.

[11]  F. Horvath,et al.  Book Review: Theories and Applications in the Detection of Deception , 1993 .

[12]  Arne Öhman,et al.  Orienting and attention: Preferred preattentive processing of potentially phobic stimuli. , 1992 .

[13]  E Donchin,et al.  The truth will out: interrogative polygraphy ("lie detection") with event-related brain potentials. , 1991, Psychophysiology.

[14]  Udo Rudolph,et al.  An experimental analysis of surprise , 1991 .

[15]  D. Siddle,et al.  Orienting, habituation, and resource allocation: an associative analysis. , 1991, Psychophysiology.

[16]  G. Ben-Shakhar,et al.  Novelty and significance in orientation and habituation: a feature-matching approach. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[17]  Gershon Ben-Shakhar,et al.  Theories and Applications in the Detection of Deception: A Psychophysiological and International Perspective , 1989 .

[18]  M. Dawson,et al.  Allocation of cognitive processing capacity during human autonomic classical conditioning. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[19]  M. Orne,et al.  Cognitive, Social, and Personality Processes in the Physiological Detection of Deception , 1981 .

[20]  P. Lang.  Behavioral treatment and bio-behavioral assessment: computer applications , 1980 .

[21]  M. Cook,et al.  Effects of attention, as indexed by subsequent memory, on electrodermal detection of information. , 1978, The Journal of applied psychology.

[22]  R. Rosner.  Computer software , 1978, Nature.

[23]  G. Ben-Shakhar,et al.  A further study of the dichotomization theory in detection of information. , 1977, Psychophysiology.

[24]  David C. Raskin,et al.  Physiological measures and the detection of deception. , 1977, Psychological bulletin.

[25]  D. Lykken,et al.  Psychology and the lie detector industry. , 1974, The American psychologist.

[26]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Attention and Effort , 1973 .

[27]  E. N. Solokov.  Perception and the conditioned reflex , 1963 .

[28]  D. Lykken.  The GSR in the detection of guilt. , 1959 .

[29]  J. Reid,et al.  A revised questioning technique in lie-detection tests. , 1947, The Journal of criminal law and criminology, including the American journal of police science.