Patch testing and contact allergens in Ethiopia – results of 514 contact dermatitis patients using the European baseline series

Background: Patch testing is essential to diagnose allergic contact dermatitis. Dermatologists in many countries use a baseline (standard) series covering the major allergens responsible for allergic contact dermatitis in their population, with the addition of relevant allergens for the individual patient. However, a baseline series has not yet been developed for Ethiopia. Our objective in this study is to identify common contact allergens to form the basis of a future baseline series in Ethiopia.

[1]  J. Sánchez,et al.  Prevalence of contact allergens in a Hispanic population. , 2008, Puerto Rico health sciences journal.

[2]  J. Yiannias,et al.  Changing trends and allergens in the patch test standard series: a mayo clinic 5-year retrospective review, january 1, 2001, through december 31, 2005. , 2008, Archives of dermatology.

[3]  Gaurav Mukhija,et al.  Patch testing experience with 1000 patients. , 2007, Indian journal of dermatology, venereology and leprology.

[4]  M. Macedo,et al.  Contact allergy in male construction workers in Sao Paulo, Brazil, 2000–2005 , 2007, Contact dermatitis.

[5]  S. M. Wilkinson,et al.  Allergic contact dermatitis in children: should pattern of dermatitis determine referral? A retrospective study of 500 children tested between 1995 and 2004 in one U.K. centre , 2006, The British journal of dermatology.

[6]  A. Akyol,et al.  Contact sensitivity to standard series allergens in 1038 patients with contact dermatitis in Turkey , 2005, Contact dermatitis.

[7]  A. Ruszkowski Patch testing. , 2005, Dermatology nursing.

[8]  O. Gefeller,et al.  Contact allergy in construction workers: results of a multifactorial analysis. , 2004, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[9]  H. Maibach,et al.  North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch-test results, 1998 to 2000 , 2003 .

[10]  H. Maibach,et al.  North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch-test results, 1998 to 2000. , 2003, American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society.

[11]  B. Gruvberger,et al.  Occupational dermatoses in a metalworking plant , 2003, Contact dermatitis.

[12]  E. Warshaw,et al.  Prevalence and methodology of patch testing by allergists in the United States: results of a cross-sectional survey. , 2002, American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society.

[13]  H. Maibach,et al.  Relationship of occupation to contact dermatitis: evaluation in patients tested from 1998 to 2000. , 2002, American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society.

[14]  S. Francalanci,et al.  Patch testing by additional series of allergens: results of further experiences. , 2001, American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society.

[15]  J. Geier,et al.  Associated positive patch test reactions to standard contact allergens. , 2001, American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society.

[16]  J. S. Taylor,et al.  Comparison of patch test results with a standard series among white and black racial groups. , 2001, American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society.

[17]  P. Koch Occupational Contact Dermatitis , 2001, American journal of clinical dermatology.

[18]  P. Milberg,et al.  Weed flora in arable fields of eastern Ethiopia with emphasis on the occurrence of Parthenium hysterophorus , 2000 .

[19]  A. Bener,et al.  Allergic contact dermatitis in the United Arab Emirates , 1999, International journal of dermatology.

[20]  T. Estlander,et al.  Patch-test reactions to plastic and glue allergens. , 1998, Acta dermato-venereologica.

[21]  S. González,et al.  Patch testing reactions to a standard series in 608 patients tested from 1990 to 1997 at Massachusetts General Hospital. , 1998, American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society.

[22]  M. Rademaker Occupational contact dermatitis among New Zealand farmers , 1998, The Australasian journal of dermatology.

[23]  V. Sharma,et al.  Common contact sensitizers in Chandigarh, India , 1998, Contact dermatitis.

[24]  Y. Liu,et al.  Patch test reactions to the chinese standard screening allergens in 1,135 patients investigated for allergic contact dermatitis , 1997 .

[25]  O. AL‐SHEIKH,et al.  ALLERGIC CONTACT DERMATITIS: CLINICAL FEATURES AND PROFILE OF SENSITIZING ALLERGENS IN RIYADH, SAUDI ARABIA , 1996, International journal of dermatology.

[26]  D. Burrows,et al.  Day 4 is better than day 3 for a single patch test reading , 1996, Contact dermatitis.

[27]  G. Ergör,et al.  On Turkey. , 1996, Studies in family planning.

[28]  S. Ng,et al.  Changing trends in the epidemiology of contact dermatitis in Singapore , 1992, Contact dermatitis.

[29]  T. Menné,et al.  How large a proportion of contact sensitivities are diagnosed with the European standard series? , 1992, Contact dermatitis.

[30]  H. Maibach,et al.  Sensitive and ethnic skin. A need for special skin-care agents? , 1991, Dermatologic clinics.

[31]  Y. Olumide Contact dermatitis in Nigeria , 1987, Contact dermatitis.

[32]  T. Thiru Moorthy,et al.  Nickel Sensitivity in Singapore , 1986, International journal of dermatology.

[33]  Y. Olumide Contact dermatitis in Nigeria , 1985, Contact dermatitis.

[34]  O. Hammershøy Standard patch test results in 3,225 consecutive Danish patients from 1973 to 1977 , 1980, Contact dermatitis.