9 Wrzosowka sheep were analyzed – average age: 5 years. The animals were divided into three groups, each with 3 sheep. All the sheep underwent the cutting of the shin stem and the fractions were stabilized with the Carboelastofix stabilizer. In the first, control group, no mechanical or biochemical stimulation was performed. In the second group, mechanical stimulation was applied, with the use of a piezoelectric inductor, mounted in the carrier of the external stabilizer. The third group involved the application of mechanical stimulation and, additionally, autogenic platelet-rich plasma was mid-surgically applied in the fracture gap. The growth analysis was performed on the basis of the X-ray pictures taken in the 2nd, 5th and 8th week after the surgery. After the experiment had been finalized, the animals were put to death, and the callus formed around the fracture was histologically examined and analyzed in a computer microtomography test. All the three groups involved bone growth. The analysis of the density of the forming callus performed on the basis of the imaging examinations did not exhibit significant differences between the tested groups; however, the density of the forming callus in the group involving mechanical stimulation was the lowest. In this way, the authors prove that, with the application of an elastic stabilizer enabling axial micromovements in the fracture during the natural limb load, the effect of the additional mechanical stimulation is insignificant for the improvement of the quality of the forming bone growth. The platelet-rich plasma, in the case of the proper fracture growth, does not affect the quality of the forming limb.
[1]
A. Goodship,et al.
Low‐magnitude high‐frequency mechanical signals accelerate and augment endochondral bone repair: Preliminary evidence of efficacy
,
2009,
Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.
[2]
P Augat,et al.
Effects of High-Frequency, Low-Magnitude Mechanical Stimulus on Bone Healing
,
2001,
Clinical orthopaedics and related research.
[3]
S. Ponzer,et al.
One-Year Outcome After Tibial Shaft Fractures: Results of a Prospective Fracture Registry
,
2001,
Journal of orthopaedic trauma.
[4]
L. Claes,et al.
Mechanical Stimulation by External Application of Cyclic Tensile Strains Does Not Effectively Enhance Bone Healing
,
2001,
Journal of orthopaedic trauma.
[5]
M. Gross,et al.
Closed tibial shaft fractures: management and treatment complications. A review of the prospective literature.
,
2000,
Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie.
[6]
S. Olerud,et al.
Tibial fractures treated by AO compression osteosynthesis. Experiences from a five year material.
,
1972,
Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica. Supplementum.