Physical and biological variables affecting seabird distributions during the upwelling season of the northern California Current

Abstract As a part of the GLOBEC-Northeast Pacific project, we investigated variation in the abundance of marine birds in the context of biological and physical habitat conditions in the northern portion of the California Current System (CCS) during cruises during the upwelling season 2000. Continuous surveys of seabirds were conducted simultaneously in June (onset of upwelling) and August (mature phase of upwelling) with ocean properties quantified using a towed, undulating vehicle and a multi-frequency bioacoustic instrument (38–420 kHz). Twelve species of seabirds contributed 99% of the total community density and biomass. Species composition and densities were similar to those recorded elsewhere in the CCS during earlier studies of the upwelling season. At a scale of 2–4 km, physical and biological oceanographic variables explained an average of 25% of the variation in the distributions and abundance of the 12 species. The most important explanatory variables (among 14 initially included in each multiple regression model) were distance to upwelling-derived frontal features (center and edge of coastal jet, and an abrupt, inshore temperature gradient), sea-surface salinity, acoustic backscatter representing various sizes of prey (smaller seabird species were associated with smaller prey and the reverse for larger seabird species), and chlorophyll concentration. We discuss the importance of these variables in the context of what factors seabirds may use to find food. The high seabird density in the Heceta Bank and Cape Blanco areas indicates them to be refuges contrasting the low seabird densities currently found in most other parts of the CCS, following decline during the recent warm regime of the Pacific Decadal Oscillation.

[1]  W. Montevecchi.  Birds as indicators of change in marine prey stocks , 1993 .

[2]  Peter Kareiva,et al.  Dimethyl sulphide as a foraging cue for Antarctic Procellariiform seabirds , 1995, Nature.

[3]  P. Fiedler,et al.  Tuna aggregation and feeding near fronts observed in satellite imagery , 1987 .

[4]  John A. Barth,et al.  Mesoscale structure and its seasonal evolution in the northern California Current System , 2005 .

[5]  H. G. Wallraff,et al.  Avian olfactory navigation: its empirical foundation and conceptual state , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[6]  Richard R. Veit,et al.  Ocean warming and seabird communities of the southern California Current System (1987–98): response at multiple temporal scales , 2003 .

[7]  D. Ainley,et al.  Variable responses of seabirds to change in marine climate: California Current, 1985-1994 , 2001 .

[8]  G. Nevitt,et al.  Olfactory foraging by Antarctic procellariiform seabirds: life at high Reynolds numbers. , 2000, The Biological bulletin.

[9]  John A. Barth,et al.  Cetacean distributions relative to ocean processes in the northern California Current System , 2005 .

[10]  George L. Hunt,et al.  Comparative foraging ecology of planktivorous auklets in relation to ocean physics and prey availability , 1998 .

[11]  S. Wanless,et al.  A comparison of feeding areas used by individual Common Murres (Uria aalge), Razorbills (Alca torda) and an Atlantic Puffin (Fratercula arctica) during the breeding season , 1990 .

[12]  Anthony J. Gaston,et al.  The Petrels: Their Ecology and Breeding Systems , 1991 .

[13]  Robert W. Furness,et al.  Birds as monitors of environmental change , 1993 .

[14]  B. D. Hardesty,et al.  Reducing biases affecting at-sea surveys of seabirds: Use of multiple observer teams , 2004 .

[15]  P. Jouventin,et al.  Olfaction in subantarctic seabirds: its phylogenetic and ecological significance , 1989 .

[16]  G. Nevitt.  Foraging by Seabirds on an Olfactory Landscape , 1999, American Scientist.

[17]  G. Hunt.  Occurrence of polar seabirds at sea in relation to prey concentrations and oceanographic factors , 1991 .

[18]  P. Liss,et al.  Dimethylsulphoxide and other biogenic sulphur compounds in the Galapagos Plume , 1998 .

[19]  Kjm Kramer,et al.  Dimethylsulphide production by plankton communities , 1995 .

[20]  L.,et al.  Small-scale interactions between prions Pachyptila spp. and their zooplankton prey at an inshore site near Bird Island, South Georgia , 1997 .

[21]  W. Godwin.  Article in Press , 2000 .

[22]  L. Ballance,et al.  Response of seabirds to thermal boundaries in the tropical Pacific: the thermocline versus the Equatorial Front , 2001 .

[23]  S. Wakeham,et al.  Oceanic Dimethylsulfide: Production During Zooplankton Grazing on Phytoplankton , 1986, Science.

[24]  B. G. Bang.  The olfactory apparatus of tubenosed birds (Procellariiformes). , 1966, Acta anatomica.

[25]  C.E. Everard,et al.  Oceanography , 1963, Journal of Navigation.

[26]  G. Hunt,et al.  Scale‐dependent correlations between the abundance of Brünnich's guillemots and their prey , 1999 .

[27]  N. Nur,et al.  Estimating Absolute Densities of Flying Seabirds Using Analyses of Relative Movement , 1992 .

[28]  Robert L. Smith,et al.  A separating coastal upwelling jet at Cape Blanco, Oregon and its connection to the California Current System , 2000 .

[29]  Karl K. Turekian,et al.  Encyclopedia of Ocean Sciences , 2001 .

[30]  M. Gosselin,et al.  Role of zooplankton in the mesoscale distribution of surface dimethylsulfide concentrations in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, Canada , 1996 .

[31]  N. B. Hargreaves,et al.  The distribution of sea birds relative to their fish prey off Vancouver Island: opposing results at large and small spatial scales , 1996 .

[32]  K. Daly,et al.  Particulate Dimethylsulfoniopropionate Removal and Dimethylsulfide Production by Zooplankton in the Southern Ocean , 1996 .

[33]  J. Piatt,et al.  Scale-dependent correlation of seabirds with schooling fish in a coastal ecosystem , 1986 .

[34]  D. Schneider,et al.  Scale-dependent variability in seabird abundance , 1985 .

[35]  L. Dijkhuizen.  BIOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY OF DMSP AND RELATED SULFONIUM COMPOUNDS , 1996 .

[36]  Christoph Hoefer.  MARINE BIRD ATTRACTION TO THERMAL FRONTS IN THE CALIFORNIA CURRENT SYSTEM , 2000 .

[37]  M. Fasham,et al.  Global fields of sea surface dimethylsulfide predicted from chlorophyll, nutrients and light , 2001 .

[38]  Franklin B. Schwing,et al.  The evolution of oceanic and atmospheric anomalies in the northeast Pacific during the El Niño and La Niña events of 1995–2001 , 2002 .

[39]  G. Swartzman,et al.  Spatial association between murres (Uria spp.), puffins (Fratercula spp.) and fish shoals near Pribilof Islands, Alaska , 2000 .

[40]  George L. Hunt,et al.  Foraging in a fractal environment: Spatial patterns in a marine predator-prey system , 1992, Landscape Ecology.

[41]  W. Fraser,et al.  Does prey preference affect habitat choice in Antarctic seabirds , 1992 .

[42]  R. Veit,et al.  Apex marine predator declines ninety percent in association with changing oceanic climate , 1997 .

[43]  George A. F. Seber,et al.  Linear regression analysis , 1977 .

[44]  R. Pollard,et al.  Frontal surveys with a towed profiling conductivity /temperature/depth measurement package (SeaSoar) , 1986, Nature.

[45]  Rlj Kwint,et al.  Annual cycle of the production and fate of DMS and DMSP in a marine coastal system , 1996 .

[46]  M. Vernet,et al.  Modelling the production and cycling of dimethylsulphide during the vernal bloom in the Barents Sea , 1999 .

[47]  G. Nevitt.  Olfactory foraging in Antarctic seabirds:a species-specific attraction to krill odors , 1999 .

[48]  Roger Harris,et al.  ICES zooplankton methodology manual , 2000 .

[49]  D. Kleinbaum,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariate Methods , 1978 .

[50]  L. Ballance,et al.  SEABIRD COMMUNITY STRUCTURE ALONG A PRODUCTIVITY GRADIENT: IMPORTANCE OF COMPETITION AND ENERGETIC CONSTRAINT , 1997 .

[51]  M. Gosselin,et al.  Production of DMSP and DMS during a mesocosm study of an Emiliania huxleyi bloom: influence of bacteria and Calanus finmarchicus grazing , 1996 .

[52]  J. Piatt,et al.  How do foraging seabirds sample their environment , 1991 .

[53]  D. Siegel-Causey,et al.  The Status, Ecology, and Conservation of Marine Birds of the North Pacific , 1996 .

[54]  Harold P. Batchelder,et al.  The GLOBEC Northeast Pacific California Current System Program , 2002 .

[55]  Arnold W. Mantyla,et al.  The effect of the geostrophic flow upon coastal sea elevations in the northern North Pacific Ocean , 1976 .

[56]  H. Carter.  Bird Communities at Sea off California: 1975 to 1983 Kenneth T. Briggs W. Breck Tyler David B. Lewis David R. Carlson , 1989 .

[57]  Dean Roemmich,et al.  Climatic Warming and the Decline of Zooplankton in the California Current , 1995, Science.

[58]  C. Ribic,et al.  Species-habitat relationships among Antarctic seabirds: a function of physical or biological factors? , 1993 .

[59]  N. Mantua,et al.  The Pacific Decadal Oscillation , 2002 .

[60]  Kurt M. Fristrup,et al.  Geometry of visual recruitment by seabirds to ephemeral foraging flocks , 1992 .

[61]  P. K. Kundu,et al.  Some Three-Dimensional Characteristics of Low-Frequency Current Fluctuations near the Oregon Coast , 1976 .

[62]  J. Wiens,et al.  Model estimation of energy flow in Oregon coastal seabird populations , 1975 .

[63]  F. Schwing,et al.  A new climate regime in northeast pacific ecosystems , 2003 .

[64]  S. T. Buckland,et al.  Validating the use of generalized additive models and at‐sea surveys to estimate size and temporal trends of seabird populations , 2003 .

[65]  J. Burger,et al.  Seabirds: Feeding Ecology and Role in Marine Ecosystems , 2009 .

[66]  John A. Wiens,et al.  The Ecology of Seabird Feeding Flocks in Alaska , 1981 .