Bone ingrowth into ploymer coated porous synthetic coralline hydroxyapatite

Porous hydroxyapatite, converted hydrothermally from the calcium carbon exoskeleton of the coral genus Goniopora (CHAG), has been shown to be effective as a scaffold for bone ingrowth (2,3,5–7,9). However, the large pores in the material resulted in low compressive strengths. In a previous study, we found that microcoating the interal surfaces of CHAG with dilactic‐polylactic acid (DL‐PLA) improved significantly its compressive properties. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of PLA microcoating on bone ingrowth into CHAG plugs. Plugs of thick‐(3:1 chloroform to DL‐PLA by weight), medium‐ (10:1), and thin‐ (30:1) coated as well as uncoated CHAG were implanted transcortically in the proximal third of the diaphysis of the rabbit tibia. Specimens were harvested at 3, 12, and 24 weeks for mechanical testing and contralaterally for histological and histomorphometric assessment. At 12 weeks, uncoated CHAG plugs developed an average ultimate interface shear stress of 26.7 MPa, compared with 17 MPa for 30:1 and 8 MPa for 10:1 and 3:1 coated specimens. At 24 weeks, there were no significant difference in shear stress among any of the specimens. Histomorphometric assessments showed that the ratio of area fractions of new bone to area fractions of new bone and void space increased from 68–70% for 3:1 and 10:1 coated specimens at 3 weeks, and to 85.5–89.5% at 24 weeks. In comparison, uncoated and 30:1 specimens had area fraction ratios of about 82% at 3 weeks and 93% at 24 weeks. Histologic sections demonstrated direct apposition of new bone to both the coating and the hydroxyapatite as well as degradation of the coating.

[1]  A. Tencer,et al.  Compressive properties of polymer coated synthetic hydroxyapatite for bone grafting. , 1985, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[2]  R M Pilliar,et al.  The optimum pore size for the fixation of porous-surfaced metal implants by the ingrowth of bone. , 1980, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[3]  R. Holmes,et al.  Bone Regeneration Within a Coralline Hydroxyapatite Implant , 1979, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[4]  E. White,et al.  The restoration of the articular surfaces overlying Replamineform porous biomaterials. , 1977, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[5]  E. White,et al.  Tissue ingrowth of Replamineform implants. , 1975, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[6]  E. White,et al.  Replamineform porous biomaterials for hard tissue implant applications. , 1975, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[7]  P. D. Wilson A Clinical Study of the Biomechanical Behavior of Massive Bone Transplants used to Reconstruct Large Bone Defects , 1972, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[8]  K C Pani,et al.  Polylactic acid for surgical implants , 1966, Archives of surgery.

[9]  K. Heiple,et al.  A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE HEALING PROCESS FOLLOWING DIFFERENT TYPES OF BONE TRANSPLANTATION. , 1963, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[10]  V. Mooney,et al.  Comparative study of porous hydroxyapatite and tricalcium phosphate as bone substitute , 1985, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.