Tibial component rotation around the transverse axis measured by radiostereometry predicts aseptic loosening better than maximal total point motion

Background and purpose — Maximal total point motion (MTPM) measured by radiostereometry (RSA) is widely used as a predictor of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) loosening. We compared the ability of different RSA measurements at different time points to predict loosening of tibial TKA components in the long term. Patients and methods — 116 TKAs in 116 patients were included in our analysis. 16 (14.8–17.4) years after surgery, 5 tibial components had been revised due to aseptic loosening. Receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated in order to investigate the specificity and sensitivity of different RSA parameters at different thresholds. Results — Rotation around the transverse (x-) axis measured 2 years postoperatively had the best predictive value of all parameters, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 80%. Using a threshold of 0.8 degrees, a specificity of 85% and a sensitivity of 50% were reached. The AUC for tibial component distal translation was 79% and it was 77% for proximal translation, whereas it was only 68% for MTPM. Interpretation — Rotation of the cemented tibial component around the transverse axis, proximal translation, and distal translation are slightly better at predicting aseptic loosening than MTPM, and tibial component migration measured after 2 years gives a good prediction of aseptic loosening up to 15 years.

[1]  K. Nilsson,et al.  Trabecular metal tibia still stable at 5 years , 2013, Acta orthopaedica.

[2]  J. Plevier,et al.  Early proximal migration of cups is associated with late revision in THA , 2012, Acta orthopaedica.

[3]  J. Plevier,et al.  Early migration of tibial components is associated with late revision , 2012, Acta orthopaedica.

[4]  Bart L Kaptein,et al.  Good diagnostic performance of early migration as a predictor of late aseptic loosening of acetabular cups: results from ten years of follow-up with Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA). , 2012, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[5]  E. Valstar,et al.  The beneficial effect of hydroxyapatite lasts , 2012, Acta orthopaedica.

[6]  K. Nilsson,et al.  A trabecular metal tibial component in total knee replacement in patients younger than 60 years: a two-year radiostereophotogrammetric analysis. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[7]  J. Ranstam,et al.  Fixed or loose? Dichotomy in RSA data for cemented cups , 2008, Acta orthopaedica.

[8]  G. Isaac The premature failure of the Charnley Elite-Plus stem , 2006 .

[9]  Kjell G Nilsson,et al.  Uncemented HA-coated Implant is the Optimum Fixation for TKA in the Young Patient , 2006, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[10]  H. Gill,et al.  The premature failure of the Charnley Elite-Plus stem: a confirmation of RSA predictions. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[11]  A. Björkman,et al.  Cemented tibial component fixation performs better than cementless fixation , 2005, Acta orthopaedica.

[12]  Gunnar Flivik,et al.  Guidelines for standardization of radiostereometry (RSA) of implants , 2005, Acta orthopaedica.

[13]  T. Dalen,et al.  O1366 IN VIVO DETERMINATION OF MODULAR TIBIAL INSERT MICROMOTION , 2004 .

[14]  Gerard A Engh,et al.  Tibial Interface Wear in Retrieved Total Knee Components and Correlations with Modular Insert Motion , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[15]  J. Kärrholm,et al.  Fixation of the tibial component using CMW-1 or Palacos bone cement with gentamicin: Similar outcome in a randomized radiostereometric study of 51 total knee arthroplasties , 2002, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[16]  K. Kolstad,et al.  All-polyethylene versus metal-backed and stemmed tibial components in cemented total knee arthroplasty. A prospective, randomised RSA study. , 2001, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[17]  K. Kolstad,et al.  Low-conforming all-polyethylene tibial component not inferior to metal-backed component in cemented total knee arthroplasty: prospective, randomized radiostereometric analysis study of the AGC total knee prosthesis. , 2000, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[18]  J Kärrholm,et al.  Hydroxyapatite coating versus cemented fixation of the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty: prospective randomized comparison of hydroxyapatite-coated and cemented tibial components with 5-year follow-up using radiostereometry. , 1999, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[19]  E R Valstar,et al.  The Effect of Hydroxyapatite on the Micromotion of Total Knee Prostheses. A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study* , 1998, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[20]  S. Toksvig-Larsen,et al.  Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis as a predictor of mechanical loosening of knee prostheses. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[21]  J Kärrholm,et al.  Femoral component migration in total knee arthroplasty: Randomized study comparing cemented and uncemented fixation of the Miller‐Galante I design , 1995, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[22]  J. Kärrholm,et al.  Increased varus-valgus tilting of screw-fixated knee prostheses. Stereoradiographic study of uncemented versus cemented tibial components. , 1993, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[23]  M. Freeman,et al.  Early migration of prostheses related to long-term survivorship. Comparison of tibial components in knee replacement. , 1992, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[24]  Leif Ryd,et al.  Micromotion in knee arthroplasty , 1986 .