PET/MRI in the Presence of Metal Implants: Completion of the Attenuation Map from PET Emission Data

We present a novel technique for accurate whole-body attenuation correction in the presence of metallic endoprosthesis, on integrated non–time-of-flight (non-TOF) PET/MRI scanners. The proposed implant PET-based attenuation map completion (IPAC) method performs a joint reconstruction of radioactivity and attenuation from the emission data to determine the position, shape, and linear attenuation coefficient (LAC) of metallic implants. Methods: The initial estimate of the attenuation map was obtained using the MR Dixon method currently available on the Siemens Biograph mMR scanner. The attenuation coefficients in the area of the MR image subjected to metal susceptibility artifacts are then reconstructed from the PET emission data using the IPAC algorithm. The method was tested on 11 subjects presenting 13 different metallic implants, who underwent CT and PET/MR scans. Relative mean LACs and Dice similarity coefficients were calculated to determine the accuracy of the reconstructed attenuation values and the shape of the metal implant, respectively. The reconstructed PET images were compared with those obtained using the reference CT-based approach and the Dixon-based method. Absolute relative change (aRC) images were generated in each case, and voxel-based analyses were performed. Results: The error in implant LAC estimation, using the proposed IPAC algorithm, was 15.7% ± 7.8%, which was significantly smaller than the Dixon- (100%) and CT- (39%) derived values. A mean Dice similarity coefficient of 73% ± 9% was obtained when comparing the IPAC- with the CT-derived implant shape. The voxel-based analysis of the reconstructed PET images revealed quantification errors (aRC) of 13.2% ± 22.1% for the IPAC- with respect to CT-corrected images. The Dixon-based method performed substantially worse, with a mean aRC of 23.1% ± 38.4%. Conclusion: We have presented a non-TOF emission-based approach for estimating the attenuation map in the presence of metallic implants, to be used for whole-body attenuation correction in integrated PET/MR scanners. The Graphics Processing Unit implementation of the algorithm will be included in the open-source reconstruction toolbox Occiput.io.

[1]  Sachin Mishra,et al.  PET/MRI: a frontier in era of complementary hybrid imaging , 2018, European Journal of Hybrid Imaging.

[2]  Ciprian Catana,et al.  Transmission imaging for integrated PET-MR systems , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  Jorge Nocedal,et al.  A Limited Memory Algorithm for Bound Constrained Optimization , 1995, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[4]  S. Vandenberghe,et al.  MRI-Based Attenuation Correction for PET/MRI Using Ultrashort Echo Time Sequences , 2010, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[5]  John M Pauly,et al.  SEMAC: Slice encoding for metal artifact correction in MRI , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  Thomas Beyer,et al.  PET/MR imaging of the pelvis in the presence of endoprostheses: reducing image artifacts and increasing accuracy through inpainting , 2013, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[7]  John M Pauly,et al.  Metal-induced artifacts in MRI. , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  C. C. Watson,et al.  New, faster, image-based scatter correction for 3D PET , 1999, 1999 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record. 1999 Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (Cat. No.99CH37019).

[9]  Kevin T. Chen,et al.  An SPM8-Based Approach for Attenuation Correction Combining Segmentation and Nonrigid Template Formation: Application to Simultaneous PET/MR Brain Imaging , 2014, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[10]  Ciprian Catana,et al.  Toward Implementing an MRI-Based PET Attenuation-Correction Method for Neurologic Studies on the MR-PET Brain Prototype , 2010, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[11]  Til Aach,et al.  Simultaneous Reconstruction of Activity and Attenuation for PET/MR , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[12]  Johan Nuyts,et al.  Completion of a truncated attenuation image from the attenuated PET emission data , 2013, IEEE Nuclear Science Symposuim & Medical Imaging Conference.

[13]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  MRI-Based Attenuation Correction for PET/MRI: A Novel Approach Combining Pattern Recognition and Atlas Registration , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[14]  Gaspar Delso,et al.  Incorporation of Time-of-Flight Information Reduces Metal Artifacts in Simultaneous Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Simulation Study , 2015, Investigative radiology.

[15]  Ninon Burgos,et al.  Attenuation Correction Synthesis for Hybrid PET-MR Scanners: Application to Brain Studies , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[16]  H. Zaidi,et al.  Impact of Time-of-Flight PET on Quantification Errors in MR Imaging–Based Attenuation Correction , 2015, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[17]  G. Gold,et al.  Applications of PET‐MRI in musculoskeletal disease , 2018, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[18]  David Izquierdo-Garcia,et al.  Comparison of MR-based attenuation correction and CT-based attenuation correction of whole-body PET/MR imaging , 2014, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[19]  B. Hargreaves,et al.  Metal artifact reduction with MAVRIC SL at 3-T MRI in patients with hip arthroplasty. , 2015, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[20]  Ian Law,et al.  Joint EANM/EANO/RANO practice guidelines/SNMMI procedure standards for imaging of gliomas using PET with radiolabelled amino acids and [18F]FDG: version 1.0 , 2018, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[21]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  MR-Based Attenuation Correction Methods for Improved PET Quantification in Lesions Within Bone and Susceptibility Artifact Regions , 2013, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[22]  Nassir Navab,et al.  Tissue Classification as a Potential Approach for Attenuation Correction in Whole-Body PET/MRI: Evaluation with PET/CT Data , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[23]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Quantitative analysis of MRI-guided attenuation correction techniques in time-of-flight brain PET/MRI , 2016, NeuroImage.

[24]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Joint Estimation of Activity and Attenuation in Whole-Body TOF PET/MRI Using Constrained Gaussian Mixture Models , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[25]  T. Beyer,et al.  Assessment of attenuation correction for myocardial PET imaging using combined PET/MRI , 2017, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

[26]  B. Rosen,et al.  PET and MR Imaging: The Odd Couple or a Match Made in Heaven? , 2013, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[27]  David Faul,et al.  Suppression of Metal Artifacts in CT Using a Reconstruction Procedure That Combines MAP and Projection Completion , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[28]  A. Buck,et al.  PET attenuation coefficients from CT images: experimental evaluation of the transformation of CT into PET 511-keV attenuation coefficients , 2002, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[29]  J. L. Herraiz,et al.  Fast Patch-Based Pseudo-CT Synthesis from T1-Weighted MR Images for PET/MR Attenuation Correction in Brain Studies , 2016, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[30]  M. Defrise,et al.  Time-of-flight PET data determine the attenuation sinogram up to a constant , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[31]  Vincent Keereman,et al.  Improvement of Attenuation Correction in Time-of-Flight PET/MR Imaging with a Positron-Emitting Source , 2014, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[32]  Patrick Dupont,et al.  Simultaneous maximum a posteriori reconstruction of attenuation and activity distributions from emission sinograms , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[33]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  elastix: A Toolbox for Intensity-Based Medical Image Registration , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.