Understanding collaborative learning behavior from Moodle log data

Although course management systems (CMSs) were originally designed for teachers to manage their teaching, little interest has been directed at students' learning. Moodle is usually regarded as a CMS. However, how to make full use of its powerful features and design them into learning tools has rarely been investigated. This study investigates two features, embedded in the Moodle system, wiki and assessment tools, to find out how they are designed to support project-based learning. The theory and rationale for using these two features in learning activities are elaborated. The effects of wiki-supported collaboration, peer grading, and feedback on junior secondary students' enquiries in liberal studies are analyzed using hierarchical multiple regression. One hundred and eighty-six students participated in the study. Working on their own wikis, commenting on the work of peers, and previous performance on the humanities course were found to be significant predictors of liberal study project performance.

[1]  Vicki L. Brakel Olson,et al.  The revising processes of sixth-grade writers with and without peer feedback. , 1990 .

[2]  M. Scardamalia Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge , 2002 .

[3]  D. Ferris The Influence of Teacher Commentary on Student Revision , 1997 .

[4]  K. Topping Peer Assessment Between Students in Colleges and Universities , 1998 .

[5]  Markus Glaser,et al.  Wiki: Web Collaboration , 2005 .

[6]  Tom Franklin,et al.  Web 2.0 for Content for Learning and Teaching in Higher Education , 2007 .

[7]  Shyan-Ming Yuan,et al.  Developing science activities through a networked peer assessment system , 2002, Comput. Educ..

[8]  C. Bereiter,et al.  Liberal education in a knowledge society , 2002 .

[9]  Todd Bryant,et al.  Social Software in Academia , 2006 .

[10]  R. C. Murray,et al.  Towards a Theory of Learning During Tutoring. , 1995 .

[11]  Michael Hardey,et al.  The city in the age of web 2.0 a new synergistic relationship between place and people , 2007 .

[12]  John Bitchener,et al.  The Effect of Different Types of Corrective Feedback on ESL Student Writing. , 2005 .

[13]  C. Carmean,et al.  Managing Courses Defining Learning: What Faculty, Students, and Administrators Want. , 2006 .

[14]  Ulrike Cress,et al.  A systemic and cognitive view on collaborative knowledge building with wikis , 2008, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[15]  Lyndsay Grant,et al.  ‘I DON’T CARE DO UR OWN PAGE!’ A case study of using wikis for collaborative work in a UK secondary school , 2009 .

[16]  Bryan N. Alexander Web 2.0: A New Wave of Innovation for Teaching and Learning? , 2006 .

[17]  K. Topping Self and Peer Assessment in School and University: Reliability, Validity and Utility , 2003 .

[18]  Mark J. W. Lee,et al.  Talk the talk: Learner-generated podcasts as catalysts for knowledge creation , 2008, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[19]  K. Topping,et al.  Formative Peer Assessment of Academic Writing Between Postgraduate Students , 2000 .

[20]  Teacher Development through Computer‐supported Knowledge Building: Experience from Hong Kong and Canadian teachers , 2006 .

[21]  Brian Lamb Wide Open Spaces: Wikis Ready or Not , 2004 .

[22]  Bob Goodwin-Jones,et al.  Blogs and Wikis: Environments for On-Line Collaboration. , 2003 .

[23]  Carol K. K. Chan,et al.  Emerging E‐Trends and Models in Teacher Education and Professional Development , 2006 .

[24]  Ronald D. Bleed The IT Leader as Alchemist: Finding the True Gold. , 2006 .

[25]  M. Bower,et al.  Wiki Pedagogy -- A Tale of Two Wikis , 2006, 2006 7th International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training.

[26]  C. Reich Peer assessment. , 1985, Canadian Medical Association journal.

[27]  Martin Ebner,et al.  Utilizing Wiki-Systems in higher education classes: a chance for universal access? , 2008, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[28]  Melissa Cole,et al.  Using Wiki technology to support student engagement: Lessons from the trenches , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[29]  Betty Collis,et al.  Web 2.0 tools and processes in higher education: quality perspectives , 2008 .

[30]  Larry Ambrose,et al.  The power of feedback. , 2002, Healthcare executive.

[31]  H. Engelhardt,et al.  Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods.Anthony S. Bryk , Stephen W. Raudenbush , 1994 .

[32]  Chin-Chung Tsai,et al.  On-line peer assessment and the role of the peer feedback: A study of high school computer course , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[33]  L. Stefani Peer, self and tutor assessment: Relative reliabilities , 1994 .

[34]  Carol K. K. Chan,et al.  Student-Directed Assessment of Knowledge Building Using Electronic Portfolios , 2007 .

[35]  C. Hoadley,et al.  Using technology to transform communities of practice into knowledge-building communities , 2005, SIGG.

[36]  Marlene Scardamalia,et al.  Education for the Knowledge Age: Design-Centered Models of Teaching and Instruction , 2006 .

[37]  Marlene Scardamalia,et al.  Computer Support for Knowledge-Building Communities , 1994 .

[38]  Ming Lai,et al.  Peer Scaffolding of Knowledge Building Through Collaborative Groups with Differential Learning Experiences , 2006 .

[39]  Wing Wah Ki,et al.  Using Web 2.0 technology to support learning, teaching and assessment in the NSS Liberal Studies subject , 2009 .

[40]  Jeffrey Hsu Innovative Technologies for Education and Learning: Education and Knowledge-Oriented Applications of Blogs, Wikis, Podcasts, and More , 2007, Int. J. Inf. Commun. Technol. Educ..

[41]  Tom Franklin and Mark Van Harmelen Web 2.0 for Learning and Teaching in Higher Education , 2007 .

[42]  D. Panescu,et al.  Emerging Technologies , 2008, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[43]  Anthony S. Bryk,et al.  Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods , 1992 .

[44]  N. Falchikov,et al.  Student Peer Assessment in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Peer and Teacher Marks , 2000 .

[45]  Curtis A. Siller,et al.  Emerging Technologies , 2008, 2018 IEEE International Meeting for Future of Electron Devices, Kansai (IMFEDK).