Women's views of pregnancy ultrasound: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND Ultrasound has become a routine part of care for pregnant women in most countries with developed health services. It is one of a range of techniques used in screening and diagnosis, but it differs from most others because of the direct access that it gives parents to images of the fetus. A review of women's views of ultrasound was commissioned as part of a larger study of the clinical and economic aspects of routine antenatal ultrasound use. METHODS Studies of women's views about antenatal screening and diagnosis were searched for on electronic databases. Studies about pregnancy ultrasound were then identified from this material. Further studies were found by contacting researchers, hand searches, and following up references. The searches were not intentionally limited by date or language. Studies that reported direct data from women about pregnancy ultrasound were then included in a structured review. Studies were not excluded on the basis of methodological quality unless they were impossible to understand. They were read by one author and tabulated. The review then addressed a series of questions in a nonquantitative way. RESULTS The structured review included 74 primary studies represented by 98 reports. Studies from 18 countries were included, and they employed methods ranging from qualitative interviewing to psychometric testing. The review included studies from the very early period of ultrasound use up to reports of research on contemporary practice. Ultrasound is very attractive to women and families. Women's early concerns about the safety of ultrasound were rarely reported in more recent research. Women often lack information about the purposes for which an ultrasound scan is being done and the technical limitations of the procedure. The strong appeal of diagnostic ultrasound use may contribute to the fact that pregnant women are often unprepared for adverse findings. CONCLUSIONS Despite the highly varied study designs and contexts for the research included, this review provided useful information about women's views of pregnancy ultrasound. One key finding for clinicians was the need for all staff, women, and partners to be well informed about the specific purposes of ultrasound scans and what they can and cannot achieve.

[1]  S. Campbell,et al.  Ultrasound scanning in women with raised serum alpha fetoprotein: short term psychological effect. , 1987, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[2]  S. Oliver,et al.  Barriers to, and facilitators of, the health of young people: a systematic review of evidence on young people's views and on interventions in mental health, physical activity and healthy eating. Vol. 1, Overview. Vol. 2, Complete report , 2002 .

[3]  V. Kemp,et al.  Maternal prenatal attachment in normal and high-risk pregnancies. , 1987, Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : JOGNN.

[4]  R. Black Seeing the baby: The impact of ultrasound technology , 1992, Journal of Genetic Counseling.

[5]  S. Campbell,et al.  Fetal sexing by ultrasound in the second trimester: maternal preference and professional ability , 1996, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[6]  Channel of Desire: Fetal Ultrasonography in Two Use-Contexts , 1994 .

[7]  A. Oakley The history of ultrasonography in obstetrics. , 1986, Birth.

[8]  B. Hyde An interview study of pregnant women's attitudes to ultrasound scanning. , 1986, Social science & medicine.

[9]  M. Gough,et al.  DILEMMAS AFTER ULTRASONIC DIAGNOSIS OF FETAL ABNORMALITY , 1985, The Lancet.

[10]  L. Platt,et al.  Impact of fetal testing on maternal anxiety. , 1985, The Journal of reproductive medicine.

[11]  S. Campbell,et al.  Ultrasound scanning in pregnancy: The short-term psychological effects of early real-time scans , 1982 .

[12]  J. Wladimiroff,et al.  Emotional reactions in women in late pregnancy (24 weeks or longer) following the ultrasound diagnosis of a severe or lethal fetal malformation , 1993, Prenatal diagnosis.

[13]  T. Marteau,et al.  Informed consent to undergo serum screening for Down's syndrome: the gap between policy and practice , 1994, BMJ.

[14]  E. Georges Fetal ultrasound imaging and the production of authoritative knowledge in Greece. , 1996, Medical anthropology quarterly.

[15]  J. Astbury,et al.  Birth events, birth experiences and social differences in postnatal depression. , 2010, Australian journal of public health.

[16]  F. Jørgensen Attitudes to prenatal screening, diagnosis and research among pregnant women who accept or decline an alpha‐fetoprotein test , 1995, Prenatal diagnosis.

[17]  J. R. Beekhuis,et al.  Women's opinions on the offer and use of prenatal diagnosis , 1991, Prenatal diagnosis.

[18]  M. Stephens,et al.  The maternal perspective on prenatal ultrasound. , 2000, The Journal of family practice.

[19]  J. Lydon,et al.  Seeing is Conunitting: A Longitudinal Study of Bolstering Commitment in Amniocentesis Patients , 1994 .

[20]  D. Economides,et al.  Acceptability by patients of transvaginal sonography in the elective assessment of the first‐trimester fetus , 1997, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[21]  G. Fava,et al.  Psychological Reactions to Ultrasound , 1988 .

[22]  A. Reading,et al.  Health beliefs and health care behaviour in pregnancy , 1982, Psychological Medicine.

[23]  T. Marteau Towards informed decisions about prenatal testing: A review , 1995, Prenatal diagnosis.

[24]  C. Moulder Understanding Pregnancy Loss , 1998 .

[25]  C. Jørgensen,et al.  Organized Routine Ultrasound in the Second Trimester - One Hundred Womens' Experiences , 1996 .

[26]  R. Petchesky Fetal Images: The Power of Visual Culture in The Politics of Reproduction , 2021, The Medicalization of Obstetrics.

[27]  Pregnant adolescents' perceptions of their babies before and after realtime ultrasound. , 1998, Journal of psychosocial nursing and mental health services.

[28]  I. Higginson,et al.  Measuring quality of care in palliative care services. , 2000, Journal of Palliative Medicine.

[29]  R. Rabinowitz,et al.  Anxiety levels of pregnant women during ultrasound examination: coping styles, amount of feedback and learned resourcefulness , 1995, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[30]  J G Thornton,et al.  A randomised trial of three methods of giving information about prenatal testing , 1995, BMJ.

[31]  J. Puddifoot,et al.  Miscarriage : Is vividness of visual imagery a factor in the grief reaction of the partner? , 1998 .

[32]  C. Jörgensen,et al.  Women's informed choice of prenatal diagnosis: early ultrasound examination-routine ultrasound examination-age-independent amniocentesis. , 1996, Fetal diagnosis and therapy.

[33]  A. Still,et al.  When Technical Rationality Fails , 1998, Journal of health psychology.

[34]  M. Mugford,et al.  Ultrasound screening in pregnancy: a systematic review of the clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and women's views. , 2000, Health technology assessment.

[35]  J. W. Sparling,et al.  The Relationship of Obstetric Ultrasound to Parent and Infant Behavior , 1988, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[36]  A. Reading The influence of maternal anxiety on the course and outcome of pregnancy: A review. , 1983 .

[37]  I. Higginson,et al.  Place of care in advanced cancer: a qualitative systematic literature review of patient preferences. , 2000, Journal of palliative medicine.

[38]  Jonathan A. Smith,et al.  Ultrasound screening for chromosomal abnormality: women's reactions to false positive results , 2000 .

[39]  A. Reading,et al.  Psychological changes over the course of pregnancy: a study of attitudes toward the fetus/neonate. , 1984, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[40]  G. Fava,et al.  Psychological reactions to ultrasound. Examination during pregnancy. , 1988, Psychotherapy and psychosomatics.

[41]  M. Marrache,et al.  Psychological Aspects of Ultrasound Imaging during Pregnancy , 1988, Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie.

[42]  A. DeSmet,et al.  Psychological Impact of the Announcement of a Fetal Abnormality on Pregnant Women and on Professionals , 1998, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[43]  N. Uddenberg,et al.  Ultrasound Diagnosis of Fetal Malformation in the Second Trimester. The Psychological Reactions of the Women , 1985 .

[44]  J. Puddifoot,et al.  Active grief, despair, and difficulty coping : some measured characteristics of male response following their partner's miscarriage , 1999 .

[45]  S. Campbell,et al.  Ultrasound scanning in women with raised serum alpha fetoprotein: Long term psychological effects , 1987 .

[46]  J. Layng Screening for nuchal translucency. Counselling should be considered an integral part of screening programmes. , 1998, BMJ.

[47]  H. Helenius,et al.  On what grounds do women participate in prenatal screening? , 1998, Prenatal diagnosis.

[48]  P. Sjödén,et al.  Perception of information, expectations and experiences among women and their partners attending a second‐trimester routine ultrasound scan , 1997, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[49]  Mona M. Tsoi BSocSc,et al.  Ultrasound scanning in pregnancy: Consumer reactions , 1987 .

[50]  A. Reading,et al.  A controlled, prospective evaluation of the acceptability of ultrasound in prenatal care , 1988 .

[51]  J. Lind,et al.  The Psychological Impact of Diagnostic Ultrasound , 1987, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[52]  Stephanie Brown Missing Voices: The Experience of Motherhood , 1995 .

[53]  S. Tautz,et al.  Between fear and relief: how rural pregnant women experience foetal ultrasound in a Botswana district hospital. , 2000, Social science & medicine.

[54]  Psychological effects of prenatal diagnosis: The example of fetal echocardiography , 1987 .

[55]  N. Stewart Women's views of ultrasonography in obstetrics. , 1986, Birth.

[56]  T. Larsen,et al.  Ultrasound screening in the 2nd trimester. The pregnant woman's background knowledge, expectations, experiences and acceptances , 2000, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[57]  T. Marteau,et al.  Detecting fetal abnormality: serum screening and fetal anomaly scans , 1995 .

[58]  M. Bobrow,et al.  Psychological consequences for parents of false negative results on prenatal screening for Down's syndrome: retrospective interview study , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[59]  A. Culyer,et al.  False-negative results in screening programmes: systematic review of impact and implications. , 2000, Health technology assessment.

[60]  Rich Oj,et al.  Cognitive and affective aspects of the responses of pregnant women to sonography. , 1981 .

[61]  T. Murphy-Black,et al.  Choice of a scan: how much info do women receive before ultrasound , 1997 .

[62]  C. Janus,et al.  Ultrasound: Patients' views , 1980, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.

[63]  M. Kovačević The impact of fetus visualization on parents' psychological reactions. , 1993 .

[64]  K. Stjernqvist,et al.  The importance of ultrasound to first-time mothers’ thoughts about their unborn child , 2001 .

[65]  S. French Perceptions of routine nuchal translucency screening , 2000 .

[66]  H. Statham,et al.  Screening for fetal abnormalities : attitudes and experiences , 1992 .

[67]  T. Field,et al.  Effects of Ultrasound Feedback on Pregnancy Anxiety, Fetal Activity, and Neonatal Outcome , 1985, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[68]  B. Kumar Is an ultrasound assessment of gestational age at the first antenatal visit of value? A randomised clinical trial , 2000, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[69]  N. Parry-Langdon,et al.  Survey of attitudes of pregnant women towards Down syndrome screening , 2000, Prenatal diagnosis.

[70]  J. Hewison,et al.  Should ultrasound scanning in pregnancy be routine , 1999 .

[71]  Ultrasound scanning in pregnancy: the psychological efforts of fetal feedback. , 1982, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[72]  N. Marlow,et al.  Women's views of ultrasonography. A comparison of women's experiences of antenatal ultrasound screening with cerebral ultrasound of their newborn infant. , 1993, Social science & medicine.

[73]  S. Weiner,et al.  Gravidas' responses to realtime ultrasound fetal image. , 1980, JOGN nursing; journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing.

[74]  D. Whynes Receipt of information and women's attitudes towards ultrasound scanning during pregnancy , 2002, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[75]  Prenatal ultrasound examinations and mother-infant bonding. , 1983, The New England journal of medicine.

[76]  N. Uddenberg,et al.  Diagnosis of Fetal Malformation in the 32nd Week of Gestation. A Psychological Challenge to the Woman and the Doctor , 1985 .

[77]  Y. Diamant,et al.  The effect of the amount of feedback on anxiety levels during ultrasound scanning , 1996, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.

[78]  S. Heidrich,et al.  Effect of Fetal Movement, Ultrasound Scans, and Amniocentesis On Maternal‐Fetal Attachment , 1989, Nursing research.

[79]  A. Reading,et al.  The effects of ultrasound examination on maternal anxiety levels , 1982, Journal of Behavioral Medicine.

[80]  Jenny Donovan,et al.  Evaluating meta-ethnography: a synthesis of qualitative research on lay experiences of diabetes and diabetes care. , 2003, Social science & medicine.

[81]  M. A. Eichmann,et al.  Fetal Sex Identification and Prenatal Bonding , 1988, Psychological reports.

[82]  M. Sandelowski SEPARATE, BUT LESS UNEQUAL: , 1994 .

[83]  M. Weinstein,et al.  What Do Patients Value?: Willingness to Pay for Ultrasound in Normal Pregnancy , 1985, Medical care.

[84]  P. Lelliott,et al.  What do we know about life on acute psychiatric wards in the UK? A review of the research evidence. , 2001, Social science & medicine.