Experimental Validation of a Novel PI Speed Controller for AC Motor Drives With Improved Transient Performances

A proportional–integral (PI) controller is the most frequently used control technique for adjustable speed-motor drives. The main advantage of a PI controller is its ability to ensure zero steady-state error under low-frequency disturbances and model uncertainties as long as the closed-loop system is stable. However, the transient performances, under a PI regulator, are highly dependent on the machine parameters, the external disturbances, and the input constraints. This brief proposes the design process of a novel PI speed controller that is capable of preserving almost the nominal transient performance under the parameter variation and external disturbances such as the load torque. The controller also suppresses the effect of input saturation that may occur because of the armature current limitation. Simulation and experimental tests are carried out to verify the validity of the proposed design process. The results revealed that the proposed PI controller is effective regarding nominal performance recovery and input constraints handling.

[1]  Andrzej M. Trzynadlowski,et al.  A Novel Predictive Direct Torque Controller for Induction Motor Drives , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[2]  Changliang Xia,et al.  Direct Torque Control for VSI-PMSM Using Vector Evaluation Factor Table , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[3]  Hassan K. Khalil,et al.  Performance recovery under output feedback sampled-data stabilization of a class of nonlinear systems , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[4]  Jong-Woo Choi,et al.  Antiwindup Strategy for PI-Type Speed Controller , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[5]  Feng Niu,et al.  Direct Torque Control for Permanent-Magnet Synchronous Machines Based on Duty Ratio Modulation , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[6]  Hassan K. Khalil,et al.  A Nonlinear High-Gain Observer for Systems With Measurement Noise in a Feedback Control Framework , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[7]  Hassan K. Khalil,et al.  Performance Recovery of Feedback-Linearization-Based Designs , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[8]  Lei Guo,et al.  Disturbance/Uncertainty Estimation and Attenuation Techniques in PMSM Drives—A Survey , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[9]  Martin P. Foster,et al.  Modified switching‐table strategy for reduction of current harmonics in direct torque controlled dual‐three‐phase permanent magnet synchronous machine drives , 2015, IET Electric Power Applications.

[10]  Wei Xing Zheng,et al.  Design of a Prediction-Accuracy-Enhanced Continuous-Time MPC for Disturbed Systems via a Disturbance Observer , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[11]  Kazushi Nakano,et al.  Nominal performance recovery by PID+Q controller and its application to antisway control of crane lifter with visual feedback , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[12]  K. T. Chau,et al.  Field-Oriented Control and Direct Torque Control for Paralleled VSIs Fed PMSM Drives With Variable Switching Frequencies , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[13]  Antonella Ferrara,et al.  Integral Sliding Mode Control for Nonlinear Systems With Matched and Unmatched Perturbations , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[14]  Andrzej M. Trzynadlowski,et al.  Robust Cascaded Nonlinear Predictive Control of a Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor With Antiwindup Compensator , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[15]  Antonella Ferrara,et al.  Robust Model Predictive Control With Integral Sliding Mode in Continuous-Time Sampled-Data Nonlinear Systems , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[16]  Hyungbo Shim,et al.  Robust Cascade Control of Electric Motor Drives Using Dual Reduced-Order PI Observer , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[17]  Jian-Xin Xu,et al.  Nonlinear integral-type sliding surface for both matched and unmatched uncertain systems , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[18]  H. Khalil,et al.  A separation principle for the stabilization of a class of nonlinear systems , 1997 .

[19]  Yuan Ren,et al.  Reduction of Both Harmonic Current and Torque Ripple for Dual Three-Phase Permanent-Magnet Synchronous Machine Using Modified Switching-Table-Based Direct Torque Control , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[20]  Leonid M. Fridman,et al.  Analysis and design of integral sliding manifolds for systems with unmatched perturbations , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[21]  Wen-Hua Chen,et al.  Disturbance observer based control for nonlinear systems , 2004, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[22]  Peter J. Gawthrop,et al.  Nonlinear PID predictive controller , 1999 .

[23]  Elias G. Strangas,et al.  Comparative Evaluation of Direct Torque Control Strategies for Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machines , 2016 .

[24]  Hassan K. Khalil,et al.  Speed control of Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor using extended high-gain observer , 2016, 2016 American Control Conference (ACC).

[25]  Petros P. Karamanakos,et al.  A Computationally Efficient Model Predictive Control Strategy for Linear Systems With Integer Inputs , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[26]  Lei Guo,et al.  Disturbance-Observer-Based Control and Related Methods—An Overview , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.