U-Shaped Curves in Development: A PDP Approach

As the articles in this issue attest, U-shaped curves in development have stimulated a wide spectrum of research across disparate task domains and age groups and have provoked a variety of ideas about their origins and theoretical significance. In our view, the ubiquity of the general pattern suggests that U-shaped curves can arise from multiple factors, and that the various viewpoints represented herein may be useful for explaining some aspects of developmental change. In this spirit, we offer an additional way of thinking about such phenomena. Specifically, we suggest that U-shaped curves can arise within a domain-general learning mechanism as it slowly masters a domain characterized by statistical regularities and exceptions. This idea differs from those considered thus far, and may encompass many of the phenomena addressed by other views, three of which we outline briefly here. JOURNAL OF COGNITION AND DEVELOPMENT, 1(5), 137–145 Copyright © 2004, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

[1]  L. Frank.  The Society for Research in Child Development , 1935 .

[2]  Morris Halle,et al.  The rules of language , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[3]  E. Thelen,et al.  Newborn stepping: An explanation for a "disappearing" reflex. , 1982 .

[4]  E Thelen,et al.  Effects of body build and arousal on newborn infant stepping. , 1982, Developmental psychobiology.

[5]  E. Thelen,et al.  The relationship between physical growth and a newborn reflex , 1984 .

[6]  Steven Pinker,et al.  Language learnability and language development , 1985 .

[7]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Learning representations by back-propagating errors , 1986, Nature.

[8]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Learning representations by back-propagation errors, nature , 1986 .

[9]  David E. Rumelhart,et al.  Brain style computation: learning and generalization , 1990 .

[10]  V. Marchman,et al.  U-shaped learning and frequency effects in a multi-layered perception: Implications for child language acquisition , 1991, Cognition.

[11]  S Pinker,et al.  Overregularization in language acquisition. , 1992, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[12]  Peter M. Todd,et al.  Learning and connectionist representations , 1993 .

[13]  Leslie B. Cohen,et al.  The Role of Object Parts in Infants' Attention to Form-Function Correlations. , 1995 .

[14]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory. , 1995, Psychological review.

[15]  Joel L. Davis,et al.  An Introduction to Neural and Electronic Networks , 1995 .

[16]  D. Lewkowicz,et al.  A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. , 2007, Journal of cognitive neuroscience.

[17]  G. Butterworth,et al.  The development of sensory, motor and cognitive capacities in early infancy : from perception to cognition , 1998 .

[18]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The parallel distributed processing approach to semantic cognition , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[19]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Semantic Cognition: A Parallel Distributed Processing Approach , 2004 .

[20]  D. Rakison,et al.  A secret agent? How infants learn about the identity of objects in a causal scene. , 2005, Journal of experimental child psychology.