Including Adults with Severe Intellectual Disabilities in Co-Design through Active Support

In recent work, design researchers have sought to ensure that people with disabilities are engaged as competent and valued contributors to co-design. Yet, little is known about how to achieve this with adults with severe intellectual disabilities. Navigating design in the context of complex care practices is challenging, charged with uncertainty, and requires sustained effort of methodological and affective adjustments. To establish a respectful co-design relationship and enrich participation, we turn to Active Support (AS), an evidence-based strategy for engaging adults with severe intellectual disabilities. We present a reflective account of long-term field work that utilized the four aspects of AS, a) every moment has potential; b) graded assistance; c) little and often; d) maximizing choice and control. We discuss how these principles contribute to deepening HCI methods by ensuring interactional turns for adults with severe disabilities, revealing their unique competences, thereby shaping design direction and providing design insight.

[1]  Karin Slegers,et al.  Codesign with people living with cognitive or sensory impairments: a case for method stories and uniqueness , 2015 .

[2]  E. Kittay A theory of justice as fair terms of social life given our inevitable dependency and our inextricable interdependency , 2015 .

[3]  J. Beadle‐Brown,et al.  Active Support: Enabling and Empowering People with Intellectual Disabilities , 2012 .

[4]  Ann Light,et al.  The human touch: participatory practice and the role of facilitation in designing with communities , 2012, PDC '12.

[5]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  Participatory Design that Matters—Facing the Big Issues , 2018, ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact..

[6]  Geraldine Fitzpatrick,et al.  Exploratory prototypes for video: interpreting PD for a complexly disabled participant , 2006, NordiCHI '06.

[7]  Ann Light,et al.  The unit of analysis in understanding the politics of participatory practice , 2010, PDC '10.

[8]  Jesper Simonsen,et al.  Contact quality in participation: a "sensethic" perspective , 2016, PDC.

[9]  Anne Marie Piper,et al.  Weaving by Touch: A Case Analysis of Accessible Making , 2020, CHI.

[10]  Anne Marie Piper,et al.  A Critical Lens on Dementia and Design in HCI , 2017, CHI.

[11]  Cynthia L. Bennett,et al.  The Care Work of Access , 2020, CHI.

[12]  Gillian R. Hayes,et al.  Disability studies as a source of critical inquiry for the field of assistive technology , 2010, ASSETS '10.

[13]  Bill Hughes,et al.  Disability Studies and Phenomenology: The carnal politics of everyday life , 1999 .

[14]  Alessandro Soro,et al.  Beyond Independence: Enabling Richer Participation through Relational Technologies , 2019, OZCHI.

[15]  FrauenbergerChristopher,et al.  In pursuit of rigour and accountability in participatory design , 2015 .

[16]  S. Wieder,et al.  The child with special needs : encouraging intellectual and emotional growth , 1998 .

[17]  Roy I. Brown,et al.  Choice as an Aspect of Quality of Life for People With Intellectual Disabilities , 2009 .

[18]  Christopher Frauenberger,et al.  In pursuit of rigour and accountability in participatory design , 2015, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[19]  J. Porter,et al.  See What I Mean: Interpreting the Meaning of Communication by People with Severe and Profound Intellectual Disabilities , 1999 .

[20]  Jörn Messeter,et al.  Formatting design dialogues – games and participation , 2008 .

[21]  J. Beadle‐Brown,et al.  Engagement in meaningful activity and "active support" of people with intellectual disabilities in residential care. , 2002, Research in developmental disabilities.

[22]  Margot Brereton,et al.  Co-Design Beyond Words: 'Moments of Interaction' with Minimally-Verbal Children on the Autism Spectrum , 2019, CHI.

[23]  Margot Brereton,et al.  Beyond ethnography: engagement and reciprocity as foundations for design research out here , 2014, CHI.

[24]  Gillian R. Hayes,et al.  Interactive visual supports for children with autism , 2010, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[25]  Ole Iversen,et al.  Relational expertise in participatory design , 2014, PDC.

[26]  D. Beukelman,et al.  Augmentative & Alternative Communication: Supporting Children & Adults With Complex Communication Needs , 2006 .

[27]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[28]  Erin Brady,et al.  Interdependence as a Frame for Assistive Technology Research and Design , 2018, ASSETS.

[29]  Kim Halskov,et al.  The diversity of participatory design research practice at PDC 2002-2012 , 2015, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[30]  Margot Brereton,et al.  Self-Expression by Design: Co-Designing the ExpressiBall with Minimally-Verbal Children on the Autism Spectrum , 2020, CHI.

[31]  C. Antaki,et al.  Promoting choice and control in residential services for people with learning disabilities , 2008 .

[32]  Gillian R. Hayes,et al.  Understanding the Role Fluidity of Stakeholders During Assistive Technology Research "In the Wild" , 2017, CHI.

[33]  David Philip Green,et al.  'I'm a rambler, I'm a gambler, I'm a long way from home': The Place of Props, Music, and Design in Dementia Care , 2016, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[34]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[35]  Elena Parmiggiani,et al.  This Is Not a Fish: On the Scale and Politics of Infrastructure Design Studies , 2017, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[36]  Anne Marie Piper,et al.  Making as Expression: Informing Design with People with Complex Communication Needs through Art Therapy , 2018, CHI.

[37]  Anthony J. Hornof,et al.  Designing for the "Universe of One": Personalized Interactive Media Systems for People with the Severe Cognitive Impairment Associated with Rett Syndrome , 2017, CHI.

[38]  Maria Puig De La Bellacasa,et al.  Matters of Care: Speculative Ethics in More than Human Worlds , 2017 .

[39]  Amanda Lazar,et al.  Approach Matters: Linking Practitioner Approaches to Technology Design for People with Dementia , 2020, CHI.

[40]  Not on any map: co-designing a meaningful bespoke technology with a child with profound learning difficulties , 2020, IDC.

[41]  Wafa Said Mosleh,et al.  Exploring the complexity of participation , 2020, CoDesign.

[42]  C. Bigby,et al.  'It's pretty hard with our ones, they can't talk, the more able bodied can participate': staff attitudes about the applicability of disability policies to people with severe and profound intellectual disabilities. , 2009, Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR.

[43]  P MacMillan,et al.  Does he take sugar? , 1980, Nursing times.

[44]  Margot Brereton,et al.  A respectful design approach to facilitate codesign with people with cognitive or sensory impairments and makers , 2019, CoDesign.

[45]  Mitchell A. Kaplan,et al.  A World Without Words: The Social Construction of Children Born Deaf And Blind , 1995 .

[46]  E. Kittay Learning from My Daughter , 2019 .

[47]  K. Slegers,et al.  Valuing implicit decision-making in participatory design: A relational approach in design with people with dementia , 2018, Design Studies.

[48]  Janice Light,et al.  Putting People First: Re-Thinking the Role of Technology in Augmentative and Alternative Communication Intervention , 2013, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[49]  J. Vorhaus Philosophy and profound disability: learning from experience , 2014 .

[50]  K. Hume,et al.  Increasing Independence in Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Review of Three Focused Interventions , 2009, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[51]  Anne Marie Piper,et al.  Designing for the Third Hand: Empowering Older Adults with Cognitive Impairment through Creating and Sharing , 2016, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[52]  L. Flicker Dementia Reconsidered: the Person Comes First , 1999, BMJ.

[53]  S. Toogood,et al.  Staffing numbers and active support: a case study , 2011 .

[54]  J. Walmsley Group homes for people with intellectual disabilities: encouraging inclusion and participation , 2010 .

[55]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Does he take sugar?: moving beyond the rhetoric of compassion , 2013, INTR.

[56]  Margot Brereton,et al.  The TalkingBox.: Revealing Strengths of Adults with Severe Cognitive Disabilities , 2020, ASSETS.

[57]  Margot Brereton,et al.  Design after design to bridge between people living with cognitive or sensory impairments, their friends and proxies , 2015 .

[58]  M. Feely Disability studies after the ontological turn: a return to the material world and material bodies without a return to essentialism , 2016 .

[59]  I. Robertson Learned helplessness. , 1986, Nursing times.

[60]  Melissa Dawe,et al.  Desperately seeking simplicity: how young adults with cognitive disabilities and their families adopt assistive technologies , 2006, CHI.

[61]  Margot Brereton,et al.  "TechShops" Engaging Young Adults with Intellectual Disability in Exploratory Design Research , 2019, CHI Extended Abstracts.