Toward a wide-field retinal prosthesis

The purpose of this paper is to present a wide field electrode array that may increase the field of vision in patients implanted with a retinal prosthesis. Mobility is often impaired in patients with low vision, particularly in those with peripheral visual loss. Studies on low vision patients as well as simulation studies on normally sighted individuals have indicated a strong correlation between the visual field and mobility. In addition, it has been shown that an increased visual field is associated with a significant improvement in visual acuity and object discrimination. Current electrode arrays implanted in animals or human vary in size; however, the retinal area covered by the electrodes has a maximum projected visual field of about 10 degrees. We have designed wide field electrode arrays that could potentially provide a visual field of 34 degrees, which may significantly improve the mobility. Tests performed on a mechanical eye model showed that it was possible to fix 10 mm wide flexible polyimide dummy electrode arrays onto the retina using a single retinal tack. They also showed that the arrays could conform to the inner curvature of the eye. Surgeries on an enucleated porcine eye model demonstrated feasibility of implantation of 10 mm wide arrays through a 5 mm eye wall incision.

[1]  I. Bailey,et al.  Visual Factors and Orientation‐Mobility Performance , 1982, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[2]  P. Walter,et al.  [Epiretinal visual prostheses]. , 2005, Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft.

[3]  E. de Juan,et al.  Open globe injuries in children: a retrospective analysis. , 2001, Journal of pediatric ophthalmology and strabismus.

[4]  B. Jones,et al.  Retinal remodeling in inherited photoreceptor degenerations , 2003, Molecular Neurobiology.

[5]  M A Mainster,et al.  Negative-lens field expander for patients with concentric field constriction. , 1984, Archives of ophthalmology.

[6]  O. Sandgren,et al.  ASSOCIATIONS BETWEEN SPECIFIC MEASURES OF VISION AND VISION-RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE IN PATIENTS WITH BOTHNIA DYSTROPHY, A DEFINED TYPE OF RETINITIS PIGMENTOSA , 2005, Retina.

[7]  E. Weichel,et al.  Current trends in the management of intraocular foreign bodies , 2008, Current opinion in ophthalmology.

[8]  D. Kangave,et al.  Retinal detachment after posterior segment intraocular foreign body injuries , 2004, International Ophthalmology.

[9]  J. Weiland,et al.  Perceptual thresholds and electrode impedance in three retinal prosthesis subjects , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[10]  J. Weiland,et al.  Visual performance using a retinal prosthesis in three subjects with retinitis pigmentosa. , 2007, American journal of ophthalmology.

[11]  A. Milam,et al.  Preservation of the inner retina in retinitis pigmentosa. A morphometric analysis. , 1997, Archives of ophthalmology.

[12]  K. Turano,et al.  Mobility performance in glaucoma. , 1999, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[13]  Thomas Stieglitz,et al.  An Optically Powered Single-Channel Stimulation Implant as Test System for Chronic Biocompatibility and Biostability of Miniaturized Retinal Vision Prostheses , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  E. Zrenner,et al.  Compound subretinal prostheses with extra-ocular parts designed for human trials: successful long-term implantation in pigs , 2007, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[15]  Tom Troscianko,et al.  Mobility performance of low‐vision adults using an electronic mobility aid , 2006, Clinical & experimental optometry.

[16]  Gislin Dagnelie,et al.  Real and virtual mobility performance in simulated prosthetic vision , 2007, Journal of neural engineering.

[17]  H. Gerding,et al.  Experimental implantation of epiretinal retina implants (EPI-RET) with an IOL-type receiver unit , 2007, Journal of neural engineering.

[18]  JAN E. LOVIE-KITCHIN,et al.  Vision and Mobility Performance of Subjects with Age-Related Macular Degeneration , 2002, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[19]  W. Feinbloom,et al.  Amorphic lenses: a mobility aid for patients with retinitis pigmentosa. , 1985, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[20]  Gislin Dagnelie,et al.  Visually guided performance of simple tasks using simulated prosthetic vision. , 2003, Artificial organs.

[21]  E. Faye,et al.  Clinical Low Vision , 1976 .

[22]  Development and surgical implantation of a vision prosthesis model into the ovine eye , 2002, Clinical & experimental ophthalmology.

[23]  J. Szlyk,et al.  Relationship between difficulty in performing daily activities and clinical measures of visual function in patients with retinitis pigmentosa. , 1997, Archives of ophthalmology.

[24]  M. Humayun,et al.  MORPHOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF THE MACULA IN EYES WITH GEOGRAPHIC ATROPHY DUE TO AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION , 2002, Retina.

[25]  J D Loudin,et al.  Optoelectronic retinal prosthesis: system design and performance , 2007, Journal of neural engineering.

[26]  J. Weiland,et al.  Long-term histological and electrophysiological results of an inactive epiretinal electrode array implantation in dogs. , 1999, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[27]  J. Ohta,et al.  The development of a multichannel electrode array for retinal prostheses , 2006, Journal of Artificial Organs.

[28]  J. Szlyk,et al.  Perceived and actual performance of daily tasks: relationship to visual function tests in individuals with retinitis pigmentosa. , 2001, Ophthalmology.

[29]  S. Haymes,et al.  Mobility of People with Retinitis Pigmentosa as a Function of Vision and Psychological Variables , 1996, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[30]  K. Horch,et al.  Mobility performance with a pixelized vision system , 1992, Vision Research.

[31]  B Brown,et al.  Contribution of Vision Variables to Mobility in Age‐Related Maculopathy Patients , 1986, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[32]  B. Munoz,et al.  Glaucoma and mobility performance: the Salisbury Eye Evaluation Project. , 2007, Ophthalmology.

[33]  J. Weiland,et al.  Pattern electrical stimulation of the human retina , 1999, Vision Research.

[34]  D. Scribner,et al.  Impedance-based retinal contact imaging as an aid for the placement of high resolution epiretinal prostheses , 2007, Journal of neural engineering.

[35]  A. Y. Chow,et al.  Subretinal semiconductor microphotodiode array. , 1998, Ophthalmic surgery and lasers.

[36]  Daniel Palanker,et al.  Design of a high-resolution optoelectronic retinal prosthesis , 2005, Journal of neural engineering.

[37]  Richard A. Normann,et al.  Simulation of a phosphene-based visual field: Visual acuity in a pixelized vision system , 2006, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[38]  R. H. Propst,et al.  Visual perception elicited by electrical stimulation of retina in blind humans. , 1996, Archives of ophthalmology.

[39]  S. Kelly,et al.  Perceptual efficacy of electrical stimulation of human retina with a microelectrode array during short-term surgical trials. , 2003, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[40]  A. Milam,et al.  Morphometric analysis of the extramacular retina from postmortem eyes with retinitis pigmentosa. , 1999, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[41]  B. Munoz,et al.  Association of Visual Field Loss and Mobility Performance in Older Adults: Salisbury Eye Evaluation Study , 2004, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[42]  K. Turano,et al.  Traditional Measures of Mobility Performance and Retinitis Pigmentosa , 1998, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.