Improving the Reading Comprehension of Middle School Students With Disabilities Through Computer-Assisted Collaborative Strategic Reading

This study investigated the effects of computer-assisted comprehension practice using a researcher-developed computer program, Computer-Assisted Collaborative Strategic Reading (CACSR), with students who had disabilities. Two reading/ language arts teachers and their 34 students with disabilities participated. Students in the intervention group received the CACSR intervention, which consisted of 50-min instructional sessions twice per week over 10 to 12 weeks. The results revealed a statistically significant difference between intervention and comparison groups' reading comprehension ability as measured by a researcher-developed, proximal measure (i.e., finding main ideas and question generation) and a distal, standardized measure (i.e., Woodcock Reading Mastery Test, Passage Comprehension). Effect sizes for all dependent measures favored the CACSR group. Furthermore, a majority of students expressed positive overall perspectives of the CACSR intervention and believed that their reading had improved.

[1]  Kenneth A. Kavale,et al.  Mega-Analysis of Meta-Analyses , 1997 .

[2]  D. Bryant,et al.  The Effects of Professional Development for Middle School General and Special Education Teachers on Implementation of Reading Strategies in Inclusive Content Area Classes , 2001 .

[3]  J. Emmett Gardner,et al.  Multimedia or not to Multimedia , 2000 .

[4]  D. C. Howell Statistical methods for psychology, 3rd ed. , 1992 .

[5]  J. Klingner,et al.  Promoting reading comprehension, content learning, and English acquisition though Collaborative Strategic Reading (CSR) , 1999 .

[6]  B. Rosenshine,et al.  Reciprocal Teaching: A Review of the Research , 1994 .

[7]  P. David Pearson Handbook of reading research. , 1990 .

[8]  Charles K. Kinzer,et al.  An Analysis of the Effects of Teacher Training and Student Grouping on Reading Comprehension Skills among Mildly Handicapped High School Students Using Computer-Assisted Instruction , 1991 .

[9]  Carol Sue Englert,et al.  Sensitivity to Text Structure in Reading and Writing: A Comparison Between Learning Disabled and Non-Learning Disabled Students , 1987 .

[10]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Reciprocal Teaching of Comprehension-Fostering and Comprehension-Monitoring Activities , 1984 .

[11]  Maria Collins,et al.  Applying Instructional Design Principles to CAI for Mildly Handicapped Students: Four Recently Conducted Studies , 1986 .

[12]  Sharon Vaughn,et al.  Collaborative Strategic Reading during Social Studies in Heterogeneous Fourth-Grade Classrooms , 1998, The Elementary School Journal.

[13]  B. Davey,et al.  Effects of Computer-Presented Text on LD Adolescents' Reading Behaviors , 1987 .

[14]  Raymond M. Klein,et al.  Computer-Assisted Reading , 1992 .

[15]  N. Heath,et al.  Prevalence and Expression of Depressive Symptomatology in Students with and without Learning Disabilities , 2000 .

[16]  David Scanlon,et al.  Can a Strategy Be Taught and Learned in Secondary Inclusive Classrooms , 1996 .

[17]  L. Fuchs,et al.  Teaching Reading Comprehension Strategies to Students With Learning Disabilities: A Review of Research , 2001 .

[18]  Russell Gersten,et al.  Direct Instruction in Reading Comprehension. , 1986 .

[19]  Pamela Jordan Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques , 1994 .

[20]  R. Woodcock Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests-Revised , 1987 .

[21]  H. Lee Swanson,et al.  Reading Research for Students with LD , 1999, Journal of learning disabilities.

[22]  H. Swanson,et al.  Experimental Intervention Research on Students with Learning Disabilities: A Meta-Analysis of Treatment Outcomes , 1998 .

[23]  Sharon Vaughn,et al.  Reciprocal Teaching of Reading Comprehension Strategies for Students with Learning Disabilities Who Use English as a Second Language , 1996, The Elementary School Journal.

[24]  Catherine Snow,et al.  Reading for Understanding: Toward an R&D Program in Reading Comprehension , 2002 .

[25]  J. Klingner,et al.  A Collaborative Effort to Enhance Reading and Writing Instruction in Inclusion Classrooms , 1998 .

[26]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[27]  Tracey E. Hall,et al.  Computer Assisted Instruction in Reading for Students with Learning Disabilities: A Research Synthesis. , 2000 .

[28]  Joanna P. Williams Improving the comprehension of disabled readers , 1998 .

[29]  R. Weisberg 1980s: A Change in Focus of Reading Comprehension Research: A Review of Reading/Learning Disabilities Research Based on an Interactive Model of Reading , 1988 .

[30]  Michael Pressley,et al.  Strategies That Improve Children's Memory and Comprehension of Text , 1989, The Elementary School Journal.

[31]  C. MacArthur,et al.  Student Assistant for Learning from Text (SALT) , 1995, Journal of learning disabilities.

[32]  Cynthia Lewis,et al.  Critical Issues: Limits of Identification: The Personal, Pleasurable, and Critical in Reader Response , 2000 .

[33]  T. Lovitt,et al.  Teaching Social Studies to High School Students with Academic Handicaps in a Mainstreamed Setting , 1989, Journal of learning disabilities.

[34]  B. Wong,et al.  Self-Questioning Instructional Research: A Review , 1985 .

[35]  D. Langenberg Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction , 2000 .

[36]  M Pressley,et al.  What We Know About Translating Comprehension-Strategies Instruction Research Into Practice , 1997, Journal of learning disabilities.

[37]  S. Vaughn,et al.  Reading Outcomes for Students with and without Reading Disabilities in General Education Middle-School Content Area Classes , 2000 .