Sacred values and conflict over Iran’s nuclear program

Conflict over Iran's nuclear program, which involves a US-led policy to impose sanctions on Iran, is perceived by each side as a preeminent challenge to its own national security and global peace. Yet, there is little scientific study or understanding of how material incentives and disincentives, such as economic sanctions, psychologically affect the targeted population and potentially influence behaviour. Here we explore the Iranian nuclear program within a paradigm concerned with sacred values. We integrate experiments within a survey of 1997 Iranians. We find that a relatively small but politically significant portion of the Iranian population believes that acquiring nuclear energy has become a sacred value, in the sense that proposed economic incentives and disincentives result in a ``backfire effect'' in which offers of material rewards or punishment lead to increased anger and greater disapproval. This pattern was specific to nuclear energy and did not hold for acquiring nuclear weapons. The present study is the first demonstration of the backfire effect for material disincentives as well as incentives, and on an issue whose apparent sacred nature is recent rather than longstanding.

[1]  Thomas C. Schelling Bargaining, Communication, and Limited War* , 2008 .

[2]  Emerging sacred values: Iran's nuclear program , 2009 .

[3]  D. Medin,et al.  Protected values: No omission bias and no framing effects , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[4]  S. Atran,et al.  Sacred Barriers to Conflict Resolution , 2007, Science.

[5]  Chapter 6 Noninstrumental Reasoning over Sacred Values: An Indonesian Case Study , 2009 .

[6]  P. Tetlock Thinking the unthinkable: sacred values and taboo cognitions , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[7]  J. Harding Talking to the Enemy:: Violent Extremism, Sacred Values and What It Means to Be Human by Scott Atran , 2011 .

[8]  G. Tullock,et al.  The calculus of consent : logical foundations of constitutional democracy , 1962 .

[9]  E. Durkheim FROM THE ELEMENTARY FORMS OF THE RELIGIOUS LIFE , 1996, The New Economic Sociology.

[10]  D. Medin,et al.  Group Identity Salience in Sacred Value Based Cultural Conflict: An Examination of the Hindu-Muslim Identities in the Kashmir and Babri Mosque Issues , 2009 .

[11]  A. Yengoyan Ritual and Religion in the Making of Humanity , 2000 .

[12]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .

[13]  Baron,et al.  Protected Values and Omission Bias. , 1999, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[14]  D. Kahneman Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics , 2003 .

[15]  Baron,et al.  Protected Values , 1997, Virology.

[16]  P. Rozin,et al.  Attachment to land: The case of the land of Israel for American and Israeli Jews and the role of contagion , 2008, Judgment and Decision Making.