Femorotibial Cartilage Thickness Change Distributions for Subjects without Signs, Symptoms, or Risk Factors of Knee Osteoarthritis

Objective To describe the distribution of longitudinal femorotibial cartilage thickness annualized rate of change (ΔThCtAB) from quasi–population-based studies, and to construct a reference distribution for men and women without signs, symptoms, or risk factors of knee osteoarthritis (OA). Methods: Segmented baseline and 1-year follow-up MRI from 43 men and 69 women of the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) asymptomatic control cohort without risk factors and also baseline and 2-year follow-up data from 77 asymptomatic women of the Pfizer A9001140 study were included. The mean, standard deviation (SD), and correlation of ΔThCtAB in medial and lateral femorotibial subregions were estimated; distributions were tested for normality and for differences between cohorts and gender. Results: Distributions of femorotibial ΔThCtAB rates were consistent between cohorts and were normally distributed, with rates <0.7%/y. Subregion ΔThCtAB SDs were correlated with mean baseline cartilage thickness (ratio = 3%-5%). However, ΔThCtAB SD did not increase with baseline thickness when estimated for different tertiles of any given subregion, indicating the relationship may rather be due to spatial location than to baseline thickness. Conclusions Distributions of (subregional) longitudinal cartilage thickness rates of change appear to be normally distributed, not significantly different from zero, and similar for different cohorts of asymptomatic subjects. Given the spatial heterogeneity of subregional cartilage change observed in OA knees, the proposed reference distribution of subregional, ΔThCtAB may be used to describe and identify structural progression (i.e., cartilage loss) in individual OA knees with greater accuracy and sensitivity than conventional approaches, such as minimal detectable difference.

[1]  T P Andriacchi,et al.  Considerations in measuring cartilage thickness using MRI: factors influencing reproducibility and accuracy. , 2005, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[2]  H C Charles,et al.  Subregional femorotibial cartilage morphology in women--comparison between healthy controls and participants with different grades of radiographic knee osteoarthritis. , 2009, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[3]  F. Eckstein,et al.  Quantitative MR imaging of cartilage and trabecular bone in osteoarthritis. , 2009, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[4]  J. Lynch,et al.  Comparison of fixed-flexion positioning with fluoroscopic semi-flexed positioning for quantifying radiographic joint-space width in the knee: test-retest reproducibility , 2003, Skeletal Radiology.

[5]  F. Cicuttini,et al.  Factors influencing longitudinal change in knee cartilage volume measured from magnetic resonance imaging in healthy men , 2005, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[6]  T. Schnitzer,et al.  Change in regional cartilage morphology and joint space width in osteoarthritis participants versus healthy controls: a multicentre study using 3.0 Tesla MRI and Lyon–Schuss radiography , 2008, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[7]  Johanne Martel-Pelletier,et al.  Risk factors associated with the loss of cartilage volume on weight-bearing areas in knee osteoarthritis patients assessed by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging: a longitudinal study , 2007, Arthritis research & therapy.

[8]  Roy D. Altman,et al.  Workshop for Consensus on Osteoarthritis Imaging: MRI of the knee , 2006 .

[9]  F Eckstein,et al.  Double echo steady state magnetic resonance imaging of knee articular cartilage at 3 Tesla: a pilot study for the Osteoarthritis Initiative , 2005, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[10]  H C Charles,et al.  Precision of 3.0 Tesla quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage morphology in a multicentre clinical trial , 2008, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[11]  Felix Eckstein,et al.  Patterns of femorotibial cartilage loss in knees with neutral, varus, and valgus alignment. , 2008, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[12]  Felix Eckstein,et al.  Quantitative imaging of cartilage morphology at 3.0 Tesla in the presence of gadopentate dimeglumine (Gd‐DTPA) , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  F Eckstein,et al.  Regional analysis of femorotibial cartilage loss in a subsample from the Osteoarthritis Initiative progression subcohort. , 2009, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[14]  Felix Eckstein,et al.  Subregional effects of meniscal tears on cartilage loss over 2 years in knee osteoarthritis , 2010, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[15]  Felix Eckstein,et al.  Rates of change and sensitivity to change in cartilage morphology in healthy knees and in knees with mild, moderate, and end‐stage radiographic osteoarthritis: Results from 831 participants from the osteoarthritis initiative , 2011, Arthritis care & research.

[16]  R Burgkart,et al.  Feasibility of T and Z scores from magnetic resonance imaging data for quantification of cartilage loss in osteoarthritis. , 2003, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[17]  Felix Eckstein,et al.  Quantitative MRI of cartilage and bone: degenerative changes in osteoarthritis , 2006, NMR in biomedicine.

[18]  F. Cicuttini,et al.  The determinants of change in patella cartilage volume--a cohort study of healthy middle-aged women. , 2008, Rheumatology.

[19]  F Eckstein,et al.  Comparison of 1-year vs 2-year change in regional cartilage thickness in osteoarthritis results from 346 participants from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. , 2011, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[20]  F Eckstein,et al.  Age-related changes in the morphology and deformational behavior of knee joint cartilage. , 2001, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[21]  Felix Eckstein,et al.  A Technique for Regional Analysis of Femorotibial Cartilage Thickness Based on Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[22]  Felix Eckstein,et al.  Spatial patterns of cartilage loss in the medial femoral condyle in osteoarthritic knees: Data from the osteoarthritis initiative , 2010, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[23]  F. Eckstein,et al.  One year change of knee cartilage morphology in the first release of participants from the Osteoarthritis Initiative progression subcohort: association with sex, body mass index, symptoms and radiographic osteoarthritis status , 2008, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[24]  F. Eckstein,et al.  Reference values and Z-scores for subregional femorotibial cartilage thickness--results from a large population-based sample (Framingham) and comparison with the non-exposed Osteoarthritis Initiative reference cohort. , 2010, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[25]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  More powerful procedures for multiple significance testing. , 1990, Statistics in medicine.

[26]  F Eckstein,et al.  Osteoarthritis may not be a one-way-road of cartilage loss--comparison of spatial patterns of cartilage change between osteoarthritic and healthy knees. , 2010, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.