How to Deal with Non-Convex Frontiers in Data Envelopment Analysis

In data envelopment analysis, we are often puzzled by the large difference between the constant-returns-scale and variable returns-to-scale scores, and by the convexity production set syndrome in spite of the S-shaped curve, often observed in many real data sets. In this paper, we propose a solution to these problems. Initially, we evaluate the constant-returns-scale and variable returns-to-scale scores for all decision-making units by means of conventional methods. We obtain the scale-efficiency for each decision-making unit. Using the scale-efficiency, we decompose the constant-returns-scale slacks for each decision-making unit into scale-independent and scale-dependent parts. Following this, we eliminate scale-dependent slacks from the data set, and thus obtain a scale-independent data set. Next, we classify decision-making units into several clusters, depending either on the degree of scale-efficiency or on some other predetermined characteristics. We evaluate slacks of scale-independent decision-making units within the same cluster using the constant-returns-scale model, and obtain the in-cluster slacks. By summing the scale-dependent and the in-cluster slacks, we define the total slacks for each decision-making unit. Following this, we evaluate the efficiency score of the decision-making unit and project it onto the efficient frontiers, which are no longer guaranteed to be convex and are usually non-convex. Finally, we define the scale-dependent data set by which we can find the scale elasticity of each decision-making unit. We apply this model to a data set of Japanese universities’ research activities.

[1]  Lennart Hjalmarsson,et al.  Are all Scales Optimal in DEA? Theory and Empirical Evidence , 2004 .

[2]  W. Cooper,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software , 1999 .

[3]  Finn R. Førsund,et al.  Calculating scale elasticity in DEA models , 2004, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[4]  N. Avkiran INVESTIGATING TECHNICAL AND SCALE EFFICIENCIES OF AUSTRALIAN UNIVERSITIES THROUGH DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS , 2001 .

[5]  Joseph C. Paradi,et al.  Assessing Bank and Bank Branch Performance: Modeling Considerations and Approaches , 2004 .

[6]  Joseph C. Paradi,et al.  Assessing Bank and Bank Branch Performance , 2011 .

[7]  Dominique Deprins,et al.  Measuring Labor-Efficiency in Post Offices , 2006 .

[8]  Necmi K. Avkiran,et al.  Applications of Data Envelopment Analysis in the Service Sector , 2011 .

[9]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis , 1997, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[10]  D. Primont,et al.  Multi-Output Production and Duality: Theory and Applications , 1994 .

[11]  Thierry Post,et al.  A quasi-concave DEA model with an application for bank branch performance evaluation , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[12]  M. Farrell,et al.  Estimating Efficient Production Functions Under Increasing Returns to Scale , 1962 .

[13]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  Estimation of returns to scale using data envelopment analysis , 1992 .

[14]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[15]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[16]  Timo Kuosmanen,et al.  DEA with efficiency classification preserving conditional convexity , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[17]  V. V. Podinovski Local and global returns to scale in performance measurement , 2004, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[18]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[19]  Wade D. Cook,et al.  Qualitative Data in Dea , 2011 .

[20]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Evaluating Program and Managerial Efficiency: An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis to Program Follow Through , 1981 .

[21]  Finn R. Førsund,et al.  Farrell revisited–Visualizing properties of DEA production frontiers , 2009, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[22]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  Bridging radial and non-radial measures of efficiency in DEA , 2007, Ann. Oper. Res..

[23]  P. Bogetoft,et al.  Benchmarking with DEA, SFA, and R , 2011 .

[24]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  Returns to scale in different DEA models , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[25]  A. V. Volodin,et al.  Constructions of economic functions and calculations of marginal rates in DEA using parametric optimization methods , 2004, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[26]  Ole Bent Olesen,et al.  Imposing the Regular Ultra Passum law in DEA models , 2013 .

[27]  M. Farrell The Measurement of Productive Efficiency , 1957 .