Perceptions of Autonomy: A Survey of User Opinions towards Autonomy in Intelligent Environments

In intelligent environment research, many believe that we should focus on developing end-user driven systems, seeking to empower the user, whereas, many others maintain that intelligent environments should be autonomous-agent driven, minimising user cognitive loading. We however, follow the premise that users of intelligent environments should be given a choice of how much autonomy they would like to keep and how much they wish to delegate to intelligent agents. This paper gives a brief overview of previous studies of user needs and concerns in intelligent environments, and reports on a recent online survey that was conducted to assess people's opinions of the use of autonomy in intelligent environments. We aim to raise awareness of the issues with using static (and extreme) levels of autonomy amongst researchers of intelligent environments and pervasive computing systems.

[1]  David Kortenkamp,et al.  Adjustable Autonomy for Human-Centered Autonomous Systems on Mars , 1998 .

[2]  Michael Koch,et al.  Ubiquitous Computing , 2001, CSCW-Kompendium.

[3]  Priscilla M. Regan.  Legislating Privacy: Technology, Social Values, and Public Policy , 1995, The Handbook of Privacy Studies.

[4]  James F. Allen,et al.  Human-Machine Collaborative Planning , 2002 .

[5]  Jae Hyun Park,et al.  A user-centered approach to designing home network interfaces , 2003, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[6]  M. Weiser,et al.  Hot topics-ubiquitous computing , 1993 .

[7]  Jeremy Bentham,et al.  The Panopticon Writings , 1995 .

[8]  Pattie Maes,et al.  Agents that reduce work and information overload , 1994, CACM.

[9]  Victor Callaghan,et al.  An Adjustable-Autonomy Agent for Intelligent Environments , 2010, 2010 Sixth International Conference on Intelligent Environments.

[10]  Mari Zakrzewski,et al.  Morphome: a constructive field study of proactive information technology in the home , 2006, DIS '06.

[11]  Norbert A. Streitz,et al.  User requirements for intelligent home environments: a scenario-driven approach and empirical cross-cultural study , 2005, sOc-EUSAI '05.

[12]  D. Burnham.  The rise of the computer state , 1983 .

[13]  O. Gandy.  The Surveillance Society: Information Technology and Bureaucratic Social Control , 1989 .

[14]  D. Lyon.  Surveillance after September 11 , 2001 .

[15]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Direct manipulation vs. interface agents , 1997, INTR.

[16]  Victor Callaghan,et al.  Achieving human-agent teamwork in eHealth based pervasive intelligent environments , 2010, 2010 4th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare.

[17]  Graham Clarke,et al.  Some socio-technical aspects of intelligent buildings and pervasive computing research , 2009 .

[18]  Hani Hagras,et al.  Programming iSpaces — A Tale of Two Paradigms , 2006 .

[19]  Mari Zakrzewski,et al.  Probing a Proactive Home : Challenges in Researching and Designing Everyday Smart Environments , 2006 .

[20]  Jeffrey M. Bradshaw,et al.  Dimensions of Adjustable Autonomy and Mixed-Initiative Interaction , 2003, Agents and Computational Autonomy.