Genetic parameters for predicted methane production and potential for reducing enteric emissions through genomic selection.

Mitigation of enteric methane (CH₄) emission in ruminants has become an important area of research because accumulation of CH₄ is linked to global warming. Nutritional and microbial opportunities to reduce CH₄ emissions have been extensively researched, but little is known about using natural variation to breed animals with lower CH₄ yield. Measuring CH₄ emission rates directly from animals is difficult and hinders direct selection on reduced CH₄ emission. However, improvements can be made through selection on associated traits (e.g., residual feed intake, RFI) or through selection on CH₄ predicted from feed intake and diet composition. The objective was to establish phenotypic and genetic variation in predicted CH₄ output, and to determine the potential of genetics to reduce methane emissions in dairy cattle. Experimental data were used and records on daily feed intake, weekly body weights, and weekly milk production were available from 548 heifers. Residual feed intake (MJ/d) is the difference between net energy intake and calculated net energy requirements for maintenance as a function of body weight and for fat- and protein-corrected milk production. Predicted methane emission (PME; g/d) is 6% of gross energy intake (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change methodology) corrected for energy content of methane (55.65 kJ/g). The estimated heritabilities for PME and RFI were 0.35 and 0.40, respectively. The positive genetic correlation between RFI and PME indicated that cows with lower RFI have lower PME (estimates ranging from 0.18 to 0.84). Hence, it is possible to decrease the methane production of a cow by selecting more-efficient cows, and the genetic variation suggests that reductions in the order of 11 to 26% in 10 yr are theoretically possible, and could be even higher in a genomic selection program. However, several uncertainties are discussed; for example, the lack of true methane measurements (and the key assumption that methane produced per unit feed is not affected by RFI level), as well as the limitations of predicting the biological consequences of selection. To overcome these limitations, an international effort is required to bring together data on feed intake and methane emissions of dairy cows.

[1]  J. Dijkstra,et al.  Effects of dietary energy source on energy balance, metabolites and reproduction variables in dairy cows in early lactation. , 2007, Theriogenology.

[2]  M. Goddard,et al.  Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. , 2001, Genetics.

[3]  T. Mcallister,et al.  Redirecting rumen fermentation to reduce methanogenesis , 2008 .

[4]  M. Goddard,et al.  Mapping multiple QTL using linkage disequilibrium and linkage analysis information and multitrait data , 2004, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[5]  D. C. Patterson,et al.  Mitigation of enteric methane emissions through improving efficiency of energy utilization and productivity in lactating dairy cows. , 2010, Journal of dairy science.

[6]  R F Veerkamp,et al.  Selection for economic efficiency of dairy cattle using information on live weight and feed intake: a review. , 1998, Journal of dairy science.

[7]  A. Robertson,et al.  The use of progeny testing with artificial insemination in dairy cattle , 1950, Journal of Genetics.

[8]  G. Russell,et al.  The effect of improving cow productivity, fertility, and longevity on the global warming potential of dairy systems. , 2011, Journal of dairy science.

[9]  M. Kreuzer,et al.  Nutritional management for enteric methane abatement: A review , 2008 .

[10]  J. France,et al.  Evaluation of enteric methane prediction equations for dairy cows used in whole farm models , 2010 .

[11]  M. Calus,et al.  Accuracy of Genomic Selection Using Different Methods to Define Haplotypes , 2008, Genetics.

[12]  A.J.H. Van Es,et al.  Feed evaluation for ruminants. I. The systems in use from May 1977-onwards in The Netherlands , 1978 .

[13]  J. Archer,et al.  Potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from beef production by selection for reduced residual feed intake. , 2002 .

[14]  J. Jensen,et al.  © American Dairy Science Association, 2007. Breed and Parity Effects on Energy Balance Profiles Through Lactation: Evidence of Genetically Driven Body Energy Change , 2007 .

[15]  R. Veerkamp,et al.  Effects of genetic selection for milk yield on energy balance, levels of hormones, and metabolites in lactating cattle, and possible links to reduced fertility ☆ , 2003 .

[16]  D. Rubin,et al.  Inference from Iterative Simulation Using Multiple Sequences , 1992 .

[17]  D. J. Roberts,et al.  Effect of genotype and feeding regime on enteric methane, non-milk nitrogen and performance of dairy cows during the winter feeding period , 2009 .

[18]  N. H. Ravindranath,et al.  2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories , 2006 .

[19]  P. VanRaden,et al.  Selection of single-nucleotide polymorphisms and quality of genotypes used in genomic evaluation of dairy cattle in the United States and Canada. , 2009, Journal of dairy science.

[20]  J. Penman,et al.  Good Practice Guidance and Uncertainty Management in National Greenhouse Gas Inventories CH 4 Emissions from Solid Waste Disposal 419 CH 4 EMISSIONS FROM SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL , 2022 .

[21]  Robin Thompson,et al.  ASREML user guide release 1.0 , 2002 .

[22]  R. Veerkamp,et al.  Genetic correlation between days until start of luteal activity and milk yield, energy balance, and live weights. , 2000, Journal of dairy science.

[23]  M. D. Vries,et al.  Comparing environmental impacts for livestock products: A review of life cycle assessments , 2010 .

[24]  R. Veerkamp Feed intake and energy balance in lactating animals. , 2002 .

[25]  J. Dijkstra,et al.  A model of enteric fermentation in dairy cows to estimate methane emission for the Dutch National Inventory Report using the IPCC Tier 3 approach , 2011 .

[26]  D. Moran,et al.  Developing breeding schemes to assist mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions. , 2010, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[27]  R. Veerkamp,et al.  Energy balance of dairy cattle in relation to milk production variables and fertility. , 2000, Journal of dairy science.

[28]  J. Goopy,et al.  Cattle selected for lower residual feed intake have reduced daily methane production. , 2007, Journal of animal science.

[29]  G. Simm,et al.  Effect of breeding for milk yield, diet and management on enteric methane emissions from dairy cows , 2010 .

[30]  F. Kelliher,et al.  Reducing CH 4 Emissions from Grazing Ruminants in New Zealand: Challenges and Opportunities , 2010 .

[31]  R. F. Veerkamp,et al.  Sources of genetic variation in energetic efficiency of dairy cows , 1995 .

[32]  E. Okine,et al.  Dietary, environmental and microbiological aspects of methane production in ruminants , 1996 .

[33]  H. Clark,et al.  Within- and between-animal variance in methane emissions in non-lactating dairy cows , 2008 .

[34]  M. Calus,et al.  Reliability of direct genomic values for animals with different relationships within and to the reference population. , 2012, Journal of dairy science.

[35]  L. Cárdenas,et al.  Exploring systems responses to mitigation of GHG in UK dairy farms , 2010 .

[36]  N. Friggens,et al.  Towards a biological basis for predicting nutrient partitioning: the dairy cow as an example. , 2007, Animal.

[37]  S. Moore,et al.  Relationships of feedlot feed efficiency, performance, and feeding behavior with metabolic rate, methane production, and energy partitioning in beef cattle. , 2006, Journal of animal science.

[38]  J. Dijkstra,et al.  Modelling the implications of feeding strategy on rumen fermentation and functioning of the rumen wall , 2008 .

[39]  M. Calus,et al.  Predicting energy balance for dairy cows using high-density single nucleotide polymorphism information. , 2010, Journal of dairy science.

[40]  A. R. Moss,et al.  Methane production by ruminants: its contribution to global warming , 2000 .

[41]  R M Murray,et al.  Rates of production of methane in the rumen and large intestine of sheep , 1976, British Journal of Nutrition.

[42]  G. Griffith,et al.  The impact of breeding to reduce residual feed intake on enteric methane emissions from the Australian beef industry , 2006 .

[43]  E. Okine,et al.  Prediction of methane production from dairy and beef cattle. , 2007, Journal of dairy science.

[44]  J E Pryce,et al.  Deterministic models of breeding scheme designs that incorporate genomic selection. , 2010, Journal of dairy science.

[45]  S. Moore,et al.  Linkage of microbial ecology to phenotype: correlation of rumen microbial ecology to cattle's feed efficiency. , 2008, FEMS microbiology letters.

[46]  D. J. Roberts,et al.  On the use of a laser methane detector in dairy cows , 2009 .

[47]  S. Moore,et al.  Feed efficiency differences and reranking in beef steers fed grower and finisher diets. , 2011, Journal of animal science.

[48]  E. George,et al.  Journal of the American Statistical Association is currently published by American Statistical Association. , 2007 .