The impact of timing yield improvement under process variation on flip-flops soft error rate

In deeply pipelined synchronous systems, any violation of the timing constraints of the flip-flops can cause the overall system to malfunction. Due to CMOS technology scaling, increased process variations result in a large delay variability causing unacceptable loss in the timing yield. Several variation tolerant techniques are introduced to mitigate this variability challenge by improving the timing yield. In the mean time, devices are getting smaller, faster, and operating at lower supply voltages. These reduced capacitances and power supply voltages combined with the increased chip density to perform more functionality increase the soft errors susceptibility and make it one of the essential design challenges. Moreover, there are many flip-flops topologies that vary in their relative performance and power consumption which make the selection decision very difficult to flip-flops designers especially under variability and soft errors challenges. Therefore, a comparative analysis between these different flip-flops topologies considering these scaling challenges is beneficial to guide the flip-flops designers in selecting the best topology for their specific application constraints. This paper presents a comparative analysis of the timing yield improvement impact on flip-flops soft error rate by using the STMicroelectronics 65-nm CMOS technology. The analyzed flip-flops are compared for power and power-delay product (PDP) overheads to achieve this timing yield improvement. Then, they are compared for the soft error susceptibility. Finally, it is shown that the timing yield improvement improves the flip-flops soft error immunity significantly.

[1]  Farid N. Najm On the need for statistical timing analysis , 2005, Proceedings. 42nd Design Automation Conference, 2005..

[2]  Philippe Roche,et al.  Factors that impact the critical charge of memory elements , 2006, 12th IEEE International On-Line Testing Symposium (IOLTS'06).

[3]  Ashutosh Das,et al.  A new family of semidynamic and dynamic flip-flops with embedded logic for high-performance processors , 1999 .

[4]  Vladimir Stojanovic,et al.  Comparative analysis of master-slave latches and flip-flops for high-performance and low-power systems , 1999, IEEE J. Solid State Circuits.

[5]  Rong Luo,et al.  Impact of process variation on soft error vulnerability for nanometer VLSI circuits , 2005, 2005 6th International Conference on ASIC.

[6]  Atila Alvandpour,et al.  Comparative Analysis of Process Variation Impact on Flip-Flop Power-Performance , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems.

[7]  David Blaauw,et al.  Statistical timing based optimization using gate sizing , 2005, Design, Automation and Test in Europe.

[8]  Atsushi Kurokawa,et al.  Challenge: variability characterization and modeling for 65- to 90-nm processes , 2005, Proceedings of the IEEE 2005 Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, 2005..

[9]  P. Hazucha,et al.  Impact of CMOS technology scaling on the atmospheric neutron soft error rate , 2000 .

[10]  R. Baumann Soft errors in advanced semiconductor devices-part I: the three radiation sources , 2001 .

[11]  Mohamed I. Elmasry,et al.  Comparative Analysis of Timing Yield Improvement under Process Variations of Flip-Flops Circuits , 2009, 2009 IEEE Computer Society Annual Symposium on VLSI.

[12]  Lorenzo Alvisi,et al.  Modeling the effect of technology trends on the soft error rate of combinational logic , 2002, Proceedings International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks.

[13]  James D. Meindl,et al.  Impact of die-to-die and within-die parameter fluctuations on the maximum clock frequency distribution for gigascale integration , 2002, IEEE J. Solid State Circuits.

[14]  Narayanan Vijaykrishnan,et al.  Analysis of soft error rate in flip-flops and scannable latches , 2003, IEEE International [Systems-on-Chip] SOC Conference, 2003. Proceedings..

[15]  Kartik Mohanram,et al.  Cost-effective radiation hardening technique for combinational logic , 2004, IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer Aided Design, 2004. ICCAD-2004..

[16]  P. R. Gada,et al.  Effects of parameter variations on timing characteristics of clocked registers , 2005 .

[17]  T. P. Ma,et al.  Ionizing radiation effects in MOS devices and circuits , 1989 .

[18]  Vivek De,et al.  Design and reliability challenges in nanometer technologies , 2004, Proceedings. 41st Design Automation Conference, 2004..

[19]  Kartik Mohanram,et al.  Cost-effective radiation hardening technique for combinational logic , 2004, IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer Aided Design, 2004. ICCAD-2004..

[20]  Jan M. Rabaey,et al.  Digital Integrated Circuits , 2003 .

[21]  Narayanan Vijaykrishnan,et al.  Variation Impact on SER of Combinational Circuits , 2007, 8th International Symposium on Quality Electronic Design (ISQED'07).

[22]  Takashi S. Nakamura,et al.  Terrestrial Neutron-Induced Soft Errors in Advanced Memory Devices , 2008 .

[23]  Kaushik Roy,et al.  Novel sizing algorithm for yield improvement under process variation in nanometer technology , 2004, Proceedings. 41st Design Automation Conference, 2004..

[24]  Tino Heijmen Soft-Error Vulnerability of Sub-100-nm Flip-Flops , 2008, 2008 14th IEEE International On-Line Testing Symposium.

[25]  F. Klass Semi-dynamic and dynamic flip-flops with embedded logic , 1998, 1998 Symposium on VLSI Circuits. Digest of Technical Papers (Cat. No.98CH36215).

[26]  Keith A. Bowman,et al.  Measurements and modeling of intrinsic fluctuations in MOSFET threshold voltage , 2005, ISLPED '05. Proceedings of the 2005 International Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Design, 2005..

[27]  James Tschanz,et al.  Parameter variations and impact on circuits and microarchitecture , 2003, Proceedings 2003. Design Automation Conference (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37451).