Sensitivity of post treatment positron emission tomography/computed tomography to detect inter-fractional range variations in scanned ion beam therapy

Abstract Background: Ion therapy, especially with modern scanning beam delivery, offers very sharp dose gradients for highly conformal cancer treatment. However, it is very sensitive to uncertainties of tissue stopping properties as well as to anatomical changes and setup errors, making range verification highly desirable. To this end, positron emission tomography (PET) can be used to measure decay products of β+-emitters created in interactions inside the patient. This work investigates the sensitivity of post treatment PET/CT (computed tomography) to detect inter-fractional range variations. Material and methods: Fourteen patients of different indication underwent PET/CT monitoring after selected treatment fractions with scanned proton or carbon ion beams. In addition to PET/CT measurements, PET and dose distributions were simulated on different co-registered CT data. Pairs of PET data were then analyzed in terms of longitudinal shifts along the beam path, as surrogate of inter-fractional range deviations. These findings were compared to changes of dose-volume-histogram indexes and corresponding dose as well as CT shifts to disentangle the origin of possible PET shifts. Results: Biological washout modeling (PET simulations) and low (<55 Bq/ml) activity concentrations (offline PET measurements, especially for 12C ions) were the main limitations for clinical treatment verification. For two selected cases, the benefit of improved washout modeling based on organ segmentation could be demonstrated. Overall, inter-fractional range shifts up to ±3 mm could be deduced from both PET measurements and simulations, and found well correlated (typically within 1.8 mm) to anatomical changes derived from CT scans, in agreement with dose data. Conclusions: Despite known limitations of post treatment PET/CT imaging, this work indicates its potential for assessing inter-fractional changes and points to future developments for improved PET-based treatment verification.

[1]  H Paganetti,et al.  Automation and uncertainty analysis of a method for in-vivo range verification in particle therapy , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  Christopher Kurz,et al.  An experimental approach to improve the Monte Carlo modelling of offline PET/CT-imaging of positron emitters induced by scanned proton beams , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  V. Vlachoudis,et al.  The FLUKA Code: Developments and Challenges for High Energy and Medical Applications , 2014 .

[4]  Ben Mijnheer,et al.  In vivo dosimetry in external beam radiotherapy. , 2013, Medical physics.

[5]  Yunhe Xie,et al.  Prompt Gamma Imaging for In Vivo Range Verification of Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy. , 2017, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  Marco Durante,et al.  Charged particles in radiation oncology , 2010, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[7]  Katia Parodi,et al.  Charged hadron tumour therapy monitoring by means of PET , 2004 .

[8]  Keiichi Nakagawa,et al.  The development and clinical use of a beam ON-LINE PET system mounted on a rotating gantry port in proton therapy. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  Julia Bauer,et al.  Clinical implementation and range evaluation of in vivo PET dosimetry for particle irradiation in patients with primary glioma. , 2015, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[10]  A. Kraan,et al.  Range Verification Methods in Particle Therapy: Underlying Physics and Monte Carlo Modeling , 2015, Front. Oncol..

[11]  Katia Parodi,et al.  Clinical implementation of full Monte Carlo dose calculation in proton beam therapy , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  K Parodi,et al.  Integration and evaluation of automated Monte Carlo simulations in the clinical practice of scanned proton and carbon ion beam therapy , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  A. Ferrari,et al.  FLUKA: A Multi-Particle Transport Code , 2005 .

[14]  Katia Parodi,et al.  PET imaging for treatment verification of ion therapy: Implementation and experience at GSI Darmstadt and MGH Boston , 2008 .

[15]  Julia Bauer,et al.  The FLUKA Code: An Accurate Simulation Tool for Particle Therapy , 2016, Front. Oncol..

[16]  Harald Paganetti,et al.  Clinical application of in-room positron emission tomography for in vivo treatment monitoring in proton radiation therapy. , 2013, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  Katia Parodi,et al.  Patient study of in vivo verification of beam delivery and range, using positron emission tomography and computed tomography imaging after proton therapy. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  Christopher Kurz,et al.  Implementation and initial clinical experience of offline PET/CT-based verification of scanned carbon ion treatment. , 2013, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[19]  Carlo Fiorini,et al.  First clinical application of a prompt gamma based in vivo proton range verification system. , 2016, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[20]  O Jäkel,et al.  Non-invasive monitoring of therapeutic carbon ion beams in a homogeneous phantom by tracking of secondary ions , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  D. Schardt,et al.  Magnetic scanning system for heavy ion therapy , 1993 .

[22]  H Paganetti,et al.  Systematic analysis of biological and physical limitations of proton beam range verification with offline PET/CT scans , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[23]  Katia Parodi,et al.  Phase Space Generation for Proton and Carbon Ion Beams for External Users’ Applications at the Heidelberg Ion Therapy Center , 2016, Front. Oncol..

[24]  Christopher Kurz,et al.  A dedicated software application for treatment verification with off-line PET/CT imaging at the Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center , 2017 .