Evidence for a memory threshold in second-choice recognition memory responses

A fundamental question in the study of cognition is whether memory strength varies continuously or whether memories sometimes fall below a threshold and fail completely. Previous studies examining this question have relied exclusively on 1 method—receiver operating characteristics—so in the current study, we addressed this issue by using a completely different approach. We tested memory for single items and for arbitrary associations (e.g., memory for random word pairs) by using a 4-alternative forced-choice test in which subjects either made a single choice or a first and a second choice. In item recognition, single- and second-choice scores were directly related, as expected if a continuous strength signal supported performance. In contrast, in associative recognition, single- and second-choice scores were found to be unrelated, as predicted by high-threshold theories. However, when the word pairs were encoded as single compound words rather than arbitrary associations, associative recognition appeared to rely more on a continuous strength process. The results support memory models that include both a continuous familiarity process and a threshold recollection process.

[1]  L. T. DeCarlo.  Signal detection theory with finite mixture distributions: theoretical developments with applications to recognition memory. , 2002, Psychological review.

[2]  Colleen M. Parks,et al.  Receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) in recognition memory: a review. , 2007, Psychological bulletin.

[3]  N. Roberts,et al.  Item recognition is less impaired than recall and associative recognition in a patient with selective hippocampal damage , 2005, Hippocampus.

[4]  Mieke Verfaellie,et al.  Disproportionate deficit in associative recognition relative to item recognition in global amnesia , 2003, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[5]  J. Dunn.  Remember-know: a matter of confidence. , 2004, Psychological review.

[6]  Lynne M. Reder,et al.  Models of recognition: A review of arguments in favor of a dual-process account , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[7]  Michael E Hasselmo,et al.  Scopolamine impairs human recognition memory: data and modeling. , 2003, Behavioral neuroscience.

[8]  Lawrence T DeCarlo,et al.  An application of signal detection theory with finite mixture distributions to source discrimination. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  J. Wixted.  Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory. , 2007, Psychological review.

[10]  B. Murdock.  Human memory: Theory and data. , 1975 .

[11]  H. Eichenbaum,et al.  Recollection-like memory retrieval in rats is dependent on the hippocampus , 2004, Nature.

[12]  J. Swets.  Signal detection and recognition by human observers : contemporary readings , 1964 .

[13]  A P Yonelinas,et al.  The contribution of recollection and familiarity to recognition and source-memory judgments: a formal dual-process model and an analysis of receiver operating characteristics. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[14]  A. Yonelinas.  Recognition memory ROCs for item and associative information: The contribution of recollection and familiarity , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[15]  C. L. Raye,et al.  Source ROCs are (typically) curvilinear: comment on Yonelinas (1999). , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[16]  A. Yonelinas.  Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: evidence for a dual-process model. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[17]  James P. Egan,et al.  Recognition memory and the operating characteristic. , 1958 .

[18]  Murray Glanzer,et al.  Six regularities of source recognition. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[19]  Colleen M. Parks,et al.  Testing a neurocomputational model of recollection, familiarity, and source recognition. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[20]  Roberto Cabeza,et al.  Effects of healthy aging on hippocampal and rhinal memory functions: an event-related fMRI study. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[21]  Jing Xu,et al.  The influence of averaging and noisy decision strategies on the recognition memory ROC , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[22]  Howard Eichenbaum,et al.  Recognition memory: opposite effects of hippocampal damage on recollection and familiarity , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[23]  Jason P. Mitchell,et al.  Multiple routes to memory: Distinct medial temporal lobe processes build item and source memories , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  A. Yonelinas.  The Nature of Recollection and Familiarity: A Review of 30 Years of Research , 2002 .

[25]  R. O’Reilly,et al.  Modeling hippocampal and neocortical contributions to recognition memory: a complementary-learning-systems approach. , 2003, Psychological review.

[26]  D. Montaldi,et al.  The neural system that mediates familiarity memory , 2006, Hippocampus.