Sex offender community notification: managing high risk criminals or exacting further vengeance?
暂无分享,去创建一个
The current trend in dealing with convicted sex offenders is to impose long prison sentences followed by stringent release conditions. Added to this practice has been the policy of making such offenders who have been returned to society more visible to the public. In state after state, sex offender community notification laws have been passed, enabling communities to be put on notice that a convicted sex offender has become a resident. To date there has been little empirical evidence regarding the impact of these laws on managing sex offenders in the community. This study focuses on the social and psychological effects of community notification on sex offender reintegration within those communities where notification has occurred. Data are derived from face-to-face interviews with 30 convicted sex offenders, residing in various locations throughout Wisconsin, who were the subjects of community notification. The findings indicate that community notification can have a critical impact on the minimum essentials needed for the reintegration of offenders within the community. What is proposed is a reintegrative approach which suggests that stable housing and employment would mitigate the disruptive and antitherapeutic effects of community notification.
[1] Abril R. Bedarf. Examining Sex Offender Community Notification Laws , 1995 .
[2] P. Finn. Sex Offender Community Notification: (491822006-001) , 1997 .
[3] R. Prentky. Community Notification and Constructive Risk Reduction , 1996 .
[4] J. E. Myers. Societal self-defense: new laws to protect children from sexual abuse. , 1996, Child abuse & neglect.