Electrochromic glazing and facade photovoltaic panels: a strategic assessment of the potential energy benefits

This article describes a methodology to compare the energy benefit that may result from the adoption of two very different facade technologies in non-domestic buildings. A comparison is made of the energy benefit that might result from: (a) replacing conventional glass with electrochromic (EC) glazing; and, (b) installing PV panels across the opaque sections of vertical facade. The energy benefit from electrochromic glazing is predicted on the basis of displaced electric lighting usage against standard glazing with blinds, whereas the energy benefit from facade PV panels is equal to their delivered electrical output. The evaluation setting is a `typical' six metre deep perimeter office space with vertical glazing. Office orientations for each of the four cardinal compass points are considered. Performance evaluations are founded on a full year's hourly meteorological data for fourteen locales across the world. The predicted energy benefit from electrochromic glazing and facade PV are related to the total annual vertical irradiation incident on the building facade. The findings indicate that the energy benefit that results from replacing standard glazing with electrochromic glazing may exceed that of facade PV for the majority of cases studied. Surprisingly, electrochromic glazings are found to provide the greatest energy benefit for those cases at the lower end of the experienced range in total annual vertical irradiation. The effectiveness of widespread deployment across multiple facades for each locale is examined. The likelihood that electrochromic glazing alone can offer sufficient solar protection without recourse to additional shading is assessed using the recently formulated useful daylight illuminance (UDI) scheme.

[1]  D.R.G. Hunt,et al.  The use of artificial lighting in relation to daylight levels and occupancy , 1979 .

[2]  W. Beckman,et al.  Solar Engineering of Thermal Processes , 1985 .

[3]  R. Sullivan,et al.  Effect of switching control strategies on the energy performance of electrochromic windows , 1994, Other Conferences.

[4]  R. Sullivan,et al.  The energy performance of electrochromic windows in heating-dominated geographic locations , 1996 .

[5]  R. Sullivan,et al.  Energy performance analysis of prototype electrochromic windows , 1996 .

[6]  Francis Rubinstein,et al.  Developing a Dynamic Envelope/Lighting Control System with Field Measurements , 1996 .

[7]  Stephen Selkowitz,et al.  Advanced fenestration systems for improved daylight performance , 1998 .

[8]  James A. Love Manual switching patterns in private offices , 1998 .

[9]  Robert Clear,et al.  Office Worker Response to an Automated Venetian Blind and Electric Lighting System: A Pilot Study , 1998 .

[10]  J. Mardaljevic Daylight simulation : validation, sky models and daylight coefficients. , 1999 .

[11]  Eleanor S. Lee,et al.  Application issues for large-area electrochromic windows in commercial buildings , 2000 .

[12]  Eero Vartiainen Electricity benefits of daylighting and photovoltaics for various solar facade layouts in office buildings , 2001 .

[13]  Tadj Oreszczyn,et al.  Occupant control of passive systems: the use of Venetian blinds , 2001 .

[14]  Azza Nabil,et al.  Performance modelling for advanced envelope systems , 2002 .

[15]  L Roche Summertime performance of an automated lighting and blinds control system , 2002 .

[16]  Christoph F. Reinhart,et al.  Monitoring manual control of electric lighting and blinds , 2003 .

[17]  Christoph F. Reinhart,et al.  Lightswitch-2002: a model for manual and automated control of electric lighting and blinds , 2004 .

[18]  Fabio Bisegna,et al.  A model study of light control systems operating with Electrochromic Windows , 2005 .

[19]  John Mardaljevic,et al.  Useful daylight illuminance: a new paradigm for assessing daylight in buildings , 2005 .

[20]  Werner Osterhaus,et al.  Discomfort glare assessment and prevention for daylight applications in office environments , 2005 .

[21]  Christoph F. Reinhart,et al.  Adding advanced behavioural models in whole building energy simulation: A study on the total energy impact of manual and automated lighting control , 2006 .

[22]  Masafumi Yamaguchi,et al.  Present status and future of crystalline silicon solar cells in Japan , 2006 .

[23]  Philip C. Eames,et al.  Development of electrochromic evacuated advanced glazing , 2006 .

[24]  Nicolas Morel,et al.  A field investigation of the intermediate light switching by users , 2006 .

[25]  Eleanor S. Lee,et al.  Subject Responses to Electrochromic Windows , 2006 .

[26]  D. Lindelöf,et al.  Bayesian optimization of visual comfort , 2007 .

[27]  S. E. Selkowitz Ed A Review of Electrochromic Window Performance Factors , 2010 .