Seismic Hazard Estimate at the Iberian Peninsula

— Seismic hazard at the Iberian Peninsula has been evaluated by using a methodology which combines both zonified and non-zonified probabilistic methods. Seismic sources are used when considering zones where certain calculation parameters may be considered homogeneous, as in zonified methods, while, on the other hand, earthquakes are considered wherever it has taken place, as in non-zonified methods. The methodology which is applied in this paper has been originally used to calculate the seismic hazard maps in the United States. In our case, it has been necessary to adapt the method to the specific features of the seismicity in the Iberian Peninsula and its geographical surroundings, not only with respect to its distribution and characteristics, but also with respect to the properties of the seismic catalog used.¶Geographically, the main feature of the result is the fact that it reflects both historical seismicity and current seismic clusters of the region. Despite the smoothing, maps show marked differences between several seismic zones; these differences becoming more noticeable as exposure time increases. Maximum seismic hazard is found to be in the southwestern region of the Peninsula, especially in the area of the Cape St. Vicent, and around Lisbon. The uncertainty of the results, without considering that due to the attenuation laws, as deduced from the other evaluation parameters, is quite stable, being more sensitive to the parameters b and m max of the Gutenberg-Richter relation.

[1]  Andrzej Kijko,et al.  Parametric-historic Procedure for Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis Part I: Estimation of Maximum Regional Magnitude mmax , 1998 .

[2]  G. R. Toro,et al.  Model of Strong Ground Motions from Earthquakes in Central and Eastern North America: Best Estimates and Uncertainties , 1997 .

[3]  Bernice Bender Modeling source zone boundary uncertainty in seismic hazard analysis , 1986 .

[4]  A. Frankel Mapping Seismic Hazard in the Central and Eastern United States , 1995 .

[5]  Andrzej Kijko,et al.  "Parametric-historic" Procedure for Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis Part II: Assessment of Seismic Hazard at Specified Site , 1999 .

[6]  L. J. O'Brien,et al.  The correlation of peak ground acceleration amplitude with seismic intensity and other physical parameters , 1977, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[7]  Carl Allin Cornell,et al.  Probabilistic Analysis of Damage to Structures under Seismic Loads , 1971 .

[8]  James N. Brune,et al.  Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis without the Ergodic Assumption , 1999 .

[9]  P. Zupančič,et al.  Spatially smoothed seismicity modeling of seismic hazard in Slovenia , 1997 .

[10]  P. Cosentino,et al.  Truncated exponential frequency-magnitude relationship in earthquake statistics , 1977, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[11]  Edward H. Field,et al.  Accounting for Site Effects in Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analyses of Southern California: Overview of the SCEC Phase III Report , 2000 .

[12]  J. F. Delgado,et al.  Attenuation of Intensity with Epicentral Distance in the Iberian Peninsula , 2000 .

[13]  J. J. Giner,et al.  Magnitude-Intensity Relationships in the Ibero-Magrebhian Region , 2000 .

[14]  A. Kijko Is it necessary to construct empirical distributions of maximum earthquake magnitudes , 1984 .

[15]  V. Pisarenko,et al.  Statistical estimation of seismic hazard parameters: Maximum possible magnitude and related parameters , 1996, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[16]  D. Weichert,et al.  Estimation of the earthquake recurrence parameters for unequal observation periods for different magnitudes , 1980 .

[17]  Robert J. Budnitz,et al.  Recommendations for probabilistic seismic hazard analysis: Guidance on uncertainty and use of experts , 1997 .

[18]  C. Cornell Engineering seismic risk analysis , 1968 .