The Effect of Quantitative Computed Tomography Acquisition Protocols on Bone Mineral Density Estimation.

Osteoporosis is characterized by bony material loss and decreased bone strength leading to a significant increase in fracture risk. Patient-specific quantitative computed tomography (QCT) finite element (FE) models may be used to predict fracture under physiological loading. Material properties for the FE models used to predict fracture are obtained by converting grayscale values from the CT into volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) using calibration phantoms. If there are any variations arising from the CT acquisition protocol, vBMD estimation and material property assignment could be affected, thus, affecting fracture risk prediction. We hypothesized that material property assignments may be dependent on scanning and postprocessing settings including voltage, current, and reconstruction kernel, thus potentially having an effect in fracture risk prediction. A rabbit femur and a standard calibration phantom were imaged by QCT using different protocols. Cortical and cancellous regions were segmented, their average Hounsfield unit (HU) values obtained and converted to vBMD. Estimated vBMD for the cortical and cancellous regions were affected by voltage and kernel but not by current. Our study demonstrated that there exists a significant variation in the estimated vBMD values obtained with different scanning acquisitions. In addition, the large noise differences observed utilizing different scanning parameters could have an important negative effect on small subregions containing fewer voxels.

[1]  T. Keller.  Predicting the compressive mechanical behavior of bone. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  H Weinans,et al.  Osteoporosis Changes the Amount of Vertebral Trabecular Bone at Risk of Fracture but Not the Vertebral Load Distribution , 2001, Spine.

[3]  Gye Hwan Jin,et al.  Measurement of Image Quality in CT Images Reconstructed with Different Kernels , 2011 .

[4]  P. M. Donnell,et al.  Vertebral Osteoporosis and Trabecular Bone Quality , 2007, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  Kozo Nakamura,et al.  Nonlinear Finite Element Model Predicts Vertebral Bone Strength and Fracture Site , 2006, Spine.

[6]  H K Genant,et al.  Quantitative computed tomography for prediction of vertebral fracture risk. , 1985, Bone.

[7]  F Eckstein,et al.  The osteoporotic vertebral structure is well adapted to the loads of daily life, but not to infrequent "error" loads. , 2004, Bone.

[8]  T. Keaveny,et al.  Quantitative computed tomography estimates of the mechanical properties of human vertebral trabecular bone , 2002, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[9]  E C McCullough,et al.  The unreliability of CT numbers as absolute values. , 1982, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  D. Dragomir-Daescu,et al.  Quantitative computed tomography-based finite element analysis predictions of femoral strength and stiffness depend on computed tomography settings. , 2015, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  Craig R. Slyfield,et al.  Quantitative Computed Tomography-Based Predictions of Vertebral Strength in Anterior Bending , 2007, Spine.

[12]  H. Genant,et al.  Osteoporosis: assessment by quantitative computed tomography. , 1985, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[13]  L. Melton,et al.  Epidemiology of vertebral fractures: implications for vertebral augmentation. , 2006, Academic radiology.

[14]  C. Cann,et al.  Quantitative CT for determination of bone mineral density: a review. , 1988, Radiology.

[15]  Kozo Nakamura,et al.  Prediction of strength and strain of the proximal femur by a CT-based finite element method. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  C. Cann,et al.  Quantitative CT applications: comparison of current scanners. , 1987, Radiology.

[17]  Majid Nazemi,et al.  On prediction of the strength levels and failure patterns of human vertebrae using quantitative computed tomography (QCT)-based finite element method. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  E. Schneider,et al.  Estimation of mechanical properties of cortical bone by computed tomography , 1991, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[19]  D. Kiel,et al.  The associations between QCT-based vertebral bone measurements and prevalent vertebral fractures depend on the spinal locations of both bone measurement and fracture , 2013, Osteoporosis International.

[20]  T. Keaveny,et al.  Trabecular bone modulus-density relationships depend on anatomic site. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  S. Cummings,et al.  Prediction of new clinical vertebral fractures in elderly men using finite element analysis of CT scans , 2012, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[22]  P. Brinckmann,et al.  Risk of vertebral insufficiency fractures in relation to compressive strength predicted by quantitative computed tomography. , 1991, European journal of radiology.

[23]  Satoru Ohashi,et al.  Prediction of Vertebral Strength Under Loading Conditions Occurring in Activities of Daily Living Using a Computed Tomography-Based Nonlinear Finite Element Method , 2009, Spine.

[24]  Lisa A Ferrara,et al.  Distribution of anterior cortical shear strain after a thoracic wedge compression fracture. , 2004, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[25]  Yifei Dai,et al.  Robust QCT/FEA Models of Proximal Femur Stiffness and Fracture Load During a Sideways Fall on the Hip , 2011, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[26]  Kozo Nakamura,et al.  Assessment of vertebral fracture risk and therapeutic effects of alendronate in postmenopausal women using a quantitative computed tomography-based nonlinear finite element method , 2009, Osteoporosis International.

[27]  Majid Mirzaei,et al.  Analysis of strength and failure pattern of human proximal femur using quantitative computed tomography (QCT)-based finite element method. , 2014, Bone.

[28]  H K Genant,et al.  Assessment of vertebral bone mineral density using volumetric quantitative CT. , 1999, Journal of computer assisted tomography.