The Impact of the Biomass Crop Assistance Program on the United States Forest Products Market: An Application of the Global Forest Products Model

As the largest consumer of petroleum and second highest producer of greenhouse gas emissions, the United States currently is a leading country in bioenergy production driven by a series of policies. One such public program that directly subsidizes biomass feedstock growers is the Biomass Crop Assistance Program (BCAP), which recently received attention for stimulating the development of bioenergy. However, critiques were also raised, concerning the possibility of intensifying the feedstock competition between bioenergy and forest products. This study, therefore, aimed at assessing the effects of BCAP on the forest product markets with the Global Forest Products Model (GFPM). Three alternative scenarios were designed to simulate three payments in BCAP. In the first scenario, the matching payment was simulated by adjusting the manufacturing cost of fuelwood and particleboard. In the second scenario, establishment payment was simulated by adjusting the supply rate of industrial roundwood. In the third scenario, the annual payment was simulated by linking the supply change rate with the soil rental rate for industrial roundwood. We found that, under the matching payment scenario, industrial roundwood and particleboard will experience a sharp decrease in production and an increase in price. For establishment payments, industrial roundwood will experience a continuous increase in production and a decrease in price. For annual payments, the industrial roundwood will experience a V-shape pattern production.

[1]  Joseph Buongiorno,et al.  Global outlook for wood and forests with the bioenergy demand implied by scenarios of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2010 .

[2]  S. Swinton,et al.  Landowner willingness to supply marginal land for bioenergy production , 2014 .

[3]  Wei-Zhe Jiang,et al.  Spatial Association and Effect Evaluation of CO2 Emission in the Chengdu-Chongqing Urban Agglomeration: Quantitative Evidence from Social Network Analysis , 2018, Sustainability.

[4]  A. Lucier,et al.  Communicating About Bioenergy Sustainability , 2013, Environmental Management.

[5]  J. Buongiorno,et al.  Effects of accelerated tariff liberalization on the forest products sector: a global modeling approach , 2001 .

[6]  P. Ince,et al.  Modeling future U.S. forest sector market and trade impacts of expansion in wood energy consumption , 2011 .

[7]  Jon D. Johnson,et al.  Hybrid Poplar in the Pacific Northwest: The Effects of Market-Driven Management , 2002, Journal of Forestry.

[8]  B. McCarl,et al.  Economic potential of short-rotation woody crops on agricultural land for pulp fiber production in the United States. , 2000 .

[9]  Bruce Lippke,et al.  Investments in Fuel Removals to Avoid Forest Fires Result in Substantial Benefits , 2006, Journal of Forestry.

[10]  Robert Bailis,et al.  Potential greenhouse gas benefits of transatlantic wood pellet trade , 2014 .

[11]  Lawrence P. Abrahamson,et al.  Evaluating the impact of three incentive programs on the economics of cofiring willow biomass with coal in New York State , 2005 .

[12]  J. Buongiorno,et al.  Consequences of increasing bioenergy demand on wood and forests: An application of the Global Forest Products Model , 2011 .

[13]  T. Volk,et al.  Biomass and nutrient removal by willow clones in experimental bioenergy plantations in New York State , 2001 .

[14]  Uwe A. Schneider,et al.  Price of CO2 emissions and use of wood in Europe , 2012 .

[15]  Wei Jiang,et al.  Economic assessment of landowners' willingness to supply energy crops on marginal lands in the northeastern of the United States , 2018, Biomass and Bioenergy.

[16]  Lawrence P. Abrahamson,et al.  The development of short-rotation willow in the northeastern United States for bioenergy and bioproducts, agroforestry and phytoremediation , 2006 .

[17]  Graeme Henkelman,et al.  Ethanol Decomposition on Pd–Au Alloy Catalysts , 2018, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C.

[18]  M. Langholtz,et al.  A sustainability framework for assessing studies about marginal lands for planting perennial energy crops , 2018, Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining.

[19]  T. Buchholz,et al.  Profitability of Willow Biomass Crops Affected by Incentive Programs , 2013, BioEnergy Research.

[20]  Joseph Buongiorno,et al.  The global timber market: implications of changes in economic growth, timber supply, and technological trends , 2000 .

[21]  Cassandra Moseley,et al.  A supply chain analysis framework for assessing state-level forest biomass utilization policies in the United States , 2011 .

[22]  Zhi Wang,et al.  Analysis and comparison on thermodynamic and economic performances of an organic Rankine cycle with constant and one-dimensional dynamic turbine efficiency , 2019, Energy Conversion and Management.