EVALUATION OF INTERNAL ADAPTATION OF CLASS V RESIN COMPOSITE RESTORATIONS USING THREE TECHNIQUES OF POLYMERIZATION

Objective: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the internal adaptation of Class V composite restorations to the cavity walls using three different techniques of polymerization. Methods: Standard cavities were prepared on the buccal and lingual surfaces of 24 extracted human third molars with margins located above and below the cementoenamel junction. Restorations were placed in one increment using two restorative systems: 3M Filtek A110/ Single Bond (M) and 3M Filtek Z250/ Single Bond (H) in the same tooth, randomly in the buccal and lingual surfaces. Resin composites were polymerized using three techniques: Group 1 – Conventional (60 s - 600 mW/cm2); Group 2 – Soft-start (20 s – 200 mW/cm2, 40 s - 600 mW/cm2); Group 3 – Pulse Activation (3 s - 200 mW/cm2, 3-min hiatus, 57 s - 600 mW/cm2). Buccolingual sections were polished, impressions taken and replicated. Specimens were assessed under scanning electron microscopy up to X1000 magnification. Scores were given for presence or absence of gaps (0 – no gap; 1 – gap in one wall; 2 – gap in two walls; 3 – gap in three walls). Results: The mean scores of the groups were (±SD) were: G1M–3.0 (± 0.0); G2M–2.43 (± 0.8); G3M– 1.71 (± 0.9); G1H– 2.14 (± 1.2); G2H- 2.00 (± 0.8); G3H- 1.67 (± 1.1). Data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Dunnet’s tests. No statistically significant difference (p>0.05) was found among groups. Gaps were observed in all groups. Conclusions: The photocuring technique and the type of resin composite had no influence on the internal adaptation of the material to the cavity walls. A positive effect was observed when the slow polymerization techniques were used.

[1]  Y. Kawano,et al.  Influence of photoactivation method on conversion, mechanical properties, degradation in ethanol and contraction stress of resin-based materials. , 2005, Journal of dentistry.

[2]  A. Versluis,et al.  Distribution of transient properties during polymerization of a light-initiated restorative composite. , 2004, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[3]  L. Pimenta,et al.  Microleakage and gap formation of resin composite restorations polymerized with different techniques. , 2004, American journal of dentistry.

[4]  J. Ferracane,et al.  Alternatives in polymerization contraction stress management. , 2004, Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB.

[5]  A. Peutzfeldt,et al.  Determinants of in vitro gap formation of resin composites. , 2004, Journal of dentistry.

[6]  G. Fleming,et al.  Cuspal movement and microleakage in premolar teeth restored with a packable composite cured in bulk or in increments. , 2003, Journal of dentistry.

[7]  L. Pimenta,et al.  Influence of polymerization technique on microleakage and microhardness of resin composite restorations. , 2003, Operative dentistry.

[8]  Nazanin Emami,et al.  Effect of light power density variations on bulk curing properties of dental composites. , 2003, Journal of dentistry.

[9]  Franklin R Tay,et al.  Technique sensitivity in bonding to vital, acid-etched dentin. , 2003, Operative dentistry.

[10]  F. Tay,et al.  The effects of dentin permeability on restorative dentistry. , 2002, Dental clinics of North America.

[11]  Y. Au,et al.  Soft-start polymerization: influence on effectiveness of cure and post-gel shrinkage. , 2001 .

[12]  A. Yap,et al.  Soft-start polymerization: influence on effectiveness of cure and post-gel shrinkage. , 2001, Operative dentistry.

[13]  B. Willershausen,et al.  Stress reduction in resin-based composites cured with a two-step light-curing unit. , 2000, American journal of dentistry.

[14]  S. von Hagen,et al.  Microleakage of compomer class V restorations: effect of load cycling, thermal cycling, and cavity shape differences. , 2000, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[15]  C. Davidson,et al.  Light-curing units, polymerization, and clinical implications. , 2000, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[16]  K. Hiller,et al.  Marginal adaption of Class V restorations with and without "softstart-polymerization". , 2000, Operative dentistry.

[17]  Kanca J rd,et al.  Pulse activation : Reducing resin-based composite contraction stresses at the enamel cavosurface margins , 1999 .

[18]  Kanca J rd Clinical experience with PYRAMID stratified aggregate restorative and the VIP unit. , 1999 .

[19]  J. Kanca,et al.  Pulse activation: reducing resin-based composite contraction stresses at the enamel cavosurface margins. , 1999, American journal of dentistry.

[20]  J. Kanca Clinical experience with PYRAMID stratified aggregate restorative and the VIP unit. , 1999, Compendium of continuing education in dentistry. (Jamesburg, N.J. : 1995). Supplement.

[21]  F Rueggeberg,et al.  Contemporary issues in photocuring. , 1999, Compendium of continuing education in dentistry. (Jamesburg, N.J. : 1995). Supplement.

[22]  R. Hickel,et al.  Physical properties and gap formation of light-cured composites with and without 'softstart-polymerization'. , 1997, Journal of dentistry.

[23]  J. C. Pereira,et al.  A review of polymerization contraction: the influence of stress development versus stress relief. , 1996, Operative dentistry.

[24]  G. Goracci,et al.  Dentinal adhesive with composite restorations: a clinical and microstructural evaluation. , 1995, International Journal of Prosthodontics.

[25]  G. Goracci,et al.  Marginal seal and biocompatibility of a fourth-generation bonding agent. , 1995, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[26]  A. Peutzfeldt,et al.  Modulus of resilience as predictor for clinical wear of restorative resins. , 1992, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[27]  E. Asmussen,et al.  Marginal adaptation of a restorative resin polymerized at reduced rate. , 1991, Scandinavian journal of dental research.

[28]  M. Brännström,et al.  Contraction gap under composite resin restorations: effect of hygroscopic expansion and thermal stress. , 1988, Operative dentistry.

[29]  C. Davidson,et al.  Setting Stress in Composite Resin in Relation to Configuration of the Restoration , 1987, Journal of dental research.