Identification and Estimation of Causal Effects of Multiple Treatments Under the Conditional Independence Assumption

The assumption that the assignment to treatments is ignorable conditional on attributes plays an important role in the applied statistic and econometric evaluation literature. Another term for it is conditional independence assumption. This paper discusses identification when there are more than two types of mutually exclusive treatments. It turns out that low dimensional balancing scores, similar to the ones valid in the case of only two treatments, exist and be used for identification of various causal effects. Therefore, a comparable reduction of the dimension of the estimation problem is achieved and the approach retains its basic simplicity. The paper also outlines a matching estimator potentially suitable in that framework.

[1]  A. Roy.  Some thoughts on the distribution of earnings , 1951 .

[2]  D. Rubin.  Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. , 1974 .

[3]  D. Rubin.  ASSIGNMENT TO TREATMENT GROUP ON THE BASIS OF A COVARIATE , 1976 .

[4]  A. Dawid.  Conditional Independence in Statistical Theory , 1979 .

[5]  D. Rubin,et al.  The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects , 1983 .

[6]  D. Rubin,et al.  Constructing a Control Group Using Multivariate Matched Sampling Methods That Incorporate the Propensity Score , 1985 .

[7]  P. Holland.  Statistics and Causal Inference , 1985 .

[8]  D B Rubin,et al.  Practical implications of modes of statistical inference for causal effects and the critical role of the assignment mechanism. , 1991, Biometrics.

[9]  J. Angrist,et al.  Estimating the Labor Market Impact of Voluntary Military Service Using Social Security Data on Military Applicants , 1995 .

[10]  M. Lechner.  Earnings and Employment Effects of Continuous Gff-the-Job Training in East Germany After Unification , 1995 .

[11]  Petra E. Todd,et al.  Matching As An Econometric Evaluation Estimator: Evidence from Evaluating a Job Training Programme , 1997 .

[12]  J. Hahn.  On the Role of the Propensity Score in Efficient Semiparametric Estimation of Average Treatment Effects , 1998 .

[13]  Petra E. Todd,et al.  Matching As An Econometric Evaluation Estimator , 1998 .

[14]  J. Heckman,et al.  The Economics and Econometrics of Active Labor Market Programs , 1999 .

[15]  G. Imbens.  The Role of the Propensity Score in Estimating Dose-Response Functions , 1999 .

[16]  G. Imbens,et al.  Efficient Estimation of Average Treatment Effects Using the Estimated Propensity Score , 2000 .

[17]  Bruno Crépon,et al.  Using matching estimators to evaluate alternative youth employment programs: Evidence from France, 1986–1988 , 2000 .

[18]  Michael Lechner,et al.  Programme Heterogeneity and Propensity Score Matching: An Application to the Evaluation of Active Labour Market Policies , 2000 .

[19]  M. Lechner,et al.  A Microeconometric Evaluation of Active Labor Market Policy in Switzerland , 2001 .