Abstract Interactive, behavior-based environmental control for swine production has inherent advantages over the conventional, temperature-based control methods. Correctly distinguishing the thermal comfort behavior of swine is critical for the success of interactive environmental control and appropriate feature selections are the basis of the correct classification. This paper compares four feature selection methods using postural images of young pigs subjected to a range of environmental conditions. Programmable cameras were used to capture the behavioral pictures which were then processed into binary images. Fourier coefficients (8×8); moments (first eight); perimeter and area; and combination of perimeter, area and moments of the binary behavioral images were used as the input patterns to a neural network. With the respective feature selection, the neural net correctly classified 96, 92, 96 and 99% training images and 78, 73, 86 and 90% testing images. Thus, the combination of perimeter, area and moments of the binary images as neural network features gave the best performance in the behavioral classification.
[1]
Rony Geers,et al.
ENVIRONMENTAL TEMPERATURE CONTROL BY THE PIG'S COMFORT BEHAVIOR THROUGH IMAGE ANALYSIS
,
1991
.
[2]
Athanasios Papoulis,et al.
Probability, Random Variables and Stochastic Processes
,
1965
.
[3]
Hongwei Xin,et al.
Technical Notes: Sampling Rate for Measurement of Piglet Thermoregulatory Behavior
,
1996
.
[4]
T. E. Bond,et al.
Continuous versus periodic observations in behaviour studies with swine raised in confinement
,
1962
.
[5]
Rony Geers,et al.
The group postural behaviour of growing pigs in relation to air velocity, air and floor temperature
,
1986
.
[6]
Alan V. Oppenheim,et al.
Discrete-Time Signal Pro-cessing
,
1989
.
[7]
Jay D. Harmon,et al.
Neural Network Analysis of Postural Behavior of Young Swine to Determine the IR Thermal Comfort State
,
1997
.
[8]
C. Boon.
The effect of departures from lower critical temperature on the group postural behaviour of pigs
,
1981
.