Genetic Options: The Impact of Genetic Ancestry Testing on Consumers’ Racial and Ethnic Identities1

The rapid growth of genetic ancestry testing has brought concerns that these tests will transform consumers’ racial and ethnic identities, producing “geneticized” identities determined by genetic knowledge. Drawing on 100 qualitative interviews with white, black, Hispanic/Latino, Asian, and Native Americans, the authors develop the genetic options theory to account for how genetic ancestry tests influence consumers’ ethnic and racial identities. The theory maintains that consumers do not accept the tests’ results as given but choose selectively from the estimates according to two mechanisms: their identity aspirations and social appraisals. Yet consumers’ prior racialization also influences their identity aspirations; white respondents aspired to new identities more readily and in substantively different ways. The authors’ findings suggest that genetic ancestry testing can reinforce race privilege among those who already experience it.

[1]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[2]  H. Gans.  Symbolic ethnicity: The future of ethnic groups and cultures in America* , 1979 .

[3]  H. Tajfel.  Human Groups and Social Categories: Studies in Social Psychology , 1981 .

[4]  M. Waters.  Ethnic Options: Choosing Identities in America , 1990 .

[5]  R. Bull,et al.  The cognitive interview: Its origins, empirical support, evaluation and practical implications , 1991 .

[6]  N. Holtzman.  Backdoor to Eugenics , 1991 .

[7]  M. Brewer.  The Social Self: On Being the Same and Different at the Same Time , 1991 .

[8]  Scott S. Keir.  Ethnic Identity: The Transformation of White America , 1992 .

[9]  N. Ellemers.  The Influence of Socio-structural Variables on Identity Management Strategies , 1993 .

[10]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[11]  M. Strube,et al.  Self-Evaluation: To Thine Own Self Be Good, To Thine Own Self Be Sure, To Thine Own Self Be True, an , 1997 .

[12]  S. Waisbord.  When the Cart of Media Is Before the Horse of Identity , 1998 .

[13]  M. Loveman.  Is “Race” Essential? , 1999, American Sociological Review.

[14]  N. Hoffart.  Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory , 2000 .

[15]  C. Elliott,et al.  Identity and genetic ancestry tracing , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[16]  Miri Song.  Choosing Ethnic Identity , 2003 .

[17]  H. Tajfel,et al.  The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. , 2004 .

[18]  C. Nash.  Genetic kinship , 2004 .

[19]  R. Tutton.  “They want to know where they came from”: population genetics, identity, and family genealogy , 2004, New genetics and society.

[20]  Lundy Braun.  Reifying Human Difference: The Debate on Genetics, Race, and Health , 2006, International journal of health services : planning, administration, evaluation.

[21]  P. Ossorio,et al.  The Science and Business of Genetic Ancestry Testing , 2007, Science.

[22]  Douglas Hartmann,et al.  Ethnicity and race : making identities in a changing world , 2007 .

[23]  Karyn R. Lacy.  Blue-Chip Black: Race, Class, and Status in the New Black Middle Class , 2007 .

[24]  A. Nelson.  Genetic Genealogy Testing and the Pursuit of African Ancestry , 2008 .

[25]  Patricia A. Monture.  "Real" Indians and Others: Mixed-Blood Urban Native Peoples and Indigenous Nationhood , 2008 .

[26]  Peter Conrad,et al.  Sequencing and Its Consequences: Path Dependence and the Relationships between Genetics and Medicalization1 , 2008, American Journal of Sociology.

[27]  P. Ossorio,et al.  The Illusive Gold Standard in Genetic Ancestry Testing , 2009, Science.

[28]  Diane Hughes,et al.  A Preliminary Analysis of Associations among Ethnic-Racial Socialization, Ethnic Discrimination, and Ethnic Identity among Urban Sixth Graders. , 2009 .

[29]  N. Morton.  Revisiting Race in a Genomic Age , 2009 .

[30]  Daphna Oyserman,et al.  Identity-Based Motivation: Implications for Intervention , 2010, The Counseling psychologist.

[31]  Nikki Khanna.  “If You're Half Black, You're Just Black”: Reflected Appraisals and the Persistence of the One-Drop Rule , 2010 .

[32]  John Novembre,et al.  Inferring genetic ancestry: opportunities, challenges, and implications. , 2010, American journal of human genetics.

[33]  Ernesto Castañeda.  Replenished Ethnicity: Mexican Americans, Immigration, and Identity , 2011 .

[34]  A. Morning.  The nature of race : how scientists think and teach about human difference , 2011 .

[35]  D. Roberts.  Fatal Invention: How Science, Politics, and Big Business Re-create Race in the Twenty-First Century , 2011 .

[36]  J. Kahn.  Race in a Bottle: The Story of BiDil and Racialized Medicine in a Post-Genomic Age , 2012 .

[37]  Aboriginal Claims: DNA Ancestry Testing and Changing Concepts of Indigeneity , 2012 .

[38]  Wendy D Roth,et al.  Race Migrations: Latinos and the Cultural Transformation of Race , 2012 .

[39]  Carlos Vargas-ramos.  Race Migrations: Latinos and the Cultural Transformation of Race , 2013 .

[40]  Steven D. Brown,et al.  Remediating Viking Origins: Genetic Code as Archival Memory of the Remote Past , 2013, Sociology.

[41]  R. Tutton,et al.  Genetics and the Sociology of Identity , 2013, Sociology.

[42]  Bruce G. Link,et al.  The Genomic Revolution and Beliefs about Essential Racial Differences , 2013, American sociological review.

[43]  K. Tallbear,et al.  Native American DNA: Tribal Belonging and the False Promise of Genetic Science , 2013 .

[44]  Bruce G. Link,et al.  Direct-to-Consumer Racial Admixture Tests and Beliefs About Essential Racial Differences , 2014, Social psychology quarterly.

[45]  M. Waters.  Ethnic identities in the future: the possible effects of mass immigration and genetic testing , 2014 .

[46]  A. Morning.  Does Genomics Challenge the Social Construction of Race? , 2014 .

[47]  Mexican Americans and the question of race , 2015 .

[48]  T. Duster.  Ancestry Testing and DNA: Uses, Limits – and Caveat Emptor , 2016 .

[49]  Carolyn A. Liebler,et al.  America’s Churning Races: Race and Ethnicity Response Changes Between Census 2000 and the 2010 Census , 2017, Demography.

[50]  Rose Williams.  The social life of DNA: race, reparations, and reconciliation after the genome , 2016 .

[51]  Haidan Chen.  People's Science: bodies and rights on the stem cell frontier , 2016 .

[52]  L. Gomez.  Mexican Americans and the Question of Race , 2016 .

[53]  Lauren D. Davenport.  The Role of Gender, Class, and Religion in Biracial Americans’ Racial Labeling Decisions , 2016 .

[54]  Geoffrey J. Leonardelli,et al.  Optimal Distinctiveness Theory : A Framework for Social Identity , Social Cognition , and Intergroup Relations , 2016 .

[55]  Andelka M. Phillips,et al.  ‘Only a click away — DTC genetics for ancestry, health, love…and more: A view of the business and regulatory landscape’ , 2016, Applied & translational genomics.

[56]  Richard M. Lee,et al.  Identity Work: Enactment of Racial-Ethnic Identity in Everyday Life , 2017 .

[57]  Joan Donovan,et al.  Genetic Ancestry Testing among White Nationalists , 2017 .

[58]  Wendy D Roth,et al.  Unsettled identities amid settled classifications? Toward a sociology of racial appraisals , 2018, Why Do We Still Talk About Race?.