Integrated Model of Chemical Perturbations of a Biological Pathway Using 18 In Vitro High-Throughput Screening Assays for the Estrogen Receptor.

We demonstrate a computational network model that integrates 18 in vitro, high-throughput screening assays measuring estrogen receptor (ER) binding, dimerization, chromatin binding, transcriptional activation, and ER-dependent cell proliferation. The network model uses activity patterns across the in vitro assays to predict whether a chemical is an ER agonist or antagonist, or is otherwise influencing the assays through a manner dependent on the physics and chemistry of the technology platform ("assay interference"). The method is applied to a library of 1812 commercial and environmental chemicals, including 45 ER positive and negative reference chemicals. Among the reference chemicals, the network model correctly identified the agonists and antagonists with the exception of very weak compounds whose activity was outside the concentration range tested. The model agonist score also correlated with the expected potency class of the active reference chemicals. Of the 1812 chemicals evaluated, 111 (6.1%) were predicted to be strongly ER active in agonist or antagonist mode. This dataset and model were also used to begin a systematic investigation of assay interference. The most prominent cause of false-positive activity (activity in an assay that is likely not due to interaction of the chemical with ER) is cytotoxicity. The model provides the ability to prioritize a large set of important environmental chemicals with human exposure potential for additional in vivo endocrine testing. Finally, this model is generalizable to any molecular pathway for which there are multiple upstream and downstream assays available.

[1]  Imran Shah,et al.  Toxicokinetic Triage for Environmental Chemicals. , 2015, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[2]  Development of an ER action indicator mouse for the study of estrogens, selective ER modulators (SERMs), and Xenobiotics. , 2001, Endocrinology.

[3]  M C Phillips,et al.  Use of cyclodextrins for manipulating cellular cholesterol content. , 1997, Journal of lipid research.

[4]  James Inglese,et al.  Apparent activity in high-throughput screening: origins of compound-dependent assay interference. , 2010, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[5]  Ross Ihaka,et al.  Gentleman R: R: A language for data analysis and graphics , 1996 .

[6]  Rupesh K. Gupta,et al.  Methoxychlor metabolites may cause ovarian toxicity through estrogen-regulated pathways. , 2006, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[7]  H. Akaike,et al.  Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle , 1973 .

[8]  B. Katzenellenbogen,et al.  Molecular mechanisms of estrogen action: selective ligands and receptor pharmacology , 2000, The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.

[9]  David M. Reif,et al.  Endocrine Profiling and Prioritization of Environmental Chemicals Using ToxCast Data , 2010, Environmental health perspectives.

[10]  B. Katzenellenbogen,et al.  Estrogen receptors: selective ligands, partners, and distinctive pharmacology. , 2000, Recent progress in hormone research.

[11]  H. Bernard,et al.  Progesterone and glucocorticoid response elements occur in the long control regions of several human papillomaviruses involved in anogenital neoplasia , 1989, Journal of virology.

[12]  J. Baell,et al.  New substructure filters for removal of pan assay interference compounds (PAINS) from screening libraries and for their exclusion in bioassays. , 2010, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[13]  Harvey J Clewell,et al.  Relative impact of incorporating pharmacokinetics on predicting in vivo hazard and mode of action from high-throughput in vitro toxicity assays. , 2013, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[14]  Vincent Laudet,et al.  Principles for modulation of the nuclear receptor superfamily , 2004, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[15]  A. E. Hoerl,et al.  Ridge regression: biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems , 2000 .

[16]  David M. Reif,et al.  High-throughput models for exposure-based chemical prioritization in the ExpoCast project. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[17]  R. Judson,et al.  High throughput heuristics for prioritizing human exposure to environmental chemicals. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[18]  H. Michna,et al.  Molecular Identification of Potential Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulator (SERM) Like Properties of Phytoestrogens in the Human Breast Cancer Cell Line MCF-7 , 2001, Planta medica.

[19]  Ian A. Watson,et al.  Rules for identifying potentially reactive or promiscuous compounds. , 2012, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[20]  Carolyn L. Smith,et al.  Molecular mechanisms of selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) action. , 2000, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[21]  J. Ohren,et al.  The Use of Biochemical and Biophysical Tools for Triage of High‐Throughput Screening Hits – A Case Study with Escherichia coli Phosphopantetheine Adenylyltransferase , 2010, Chemical biology & drug design.

[22]  David S. Wishart,et al.  DrugBank: a knowledgebase for drugs, drug actions and drug targets , 2007, Nucleic Acids Res..

[23]  David M. Reif,et al.  Activity profiles of 309 ToxCast™ chemicals evaluated across 292 biochemical targets. , 2011, Toxicology.

[24]  David M. Reif,et al.  In Vitro Screening of Environmental Chemicals for Targeted Testing Prioritization: The ToxCast Project , 2009, Environmental health perspectives.

[25]  Robert J Kavlock,et al.  Impact of environmental chemicals on key transcription regulators and correlation to toxicity end points within EPA's ToxCast program. , 2010, Chemical research in toxicology.

[26]  David M. Reif,et al.  Profiling of the Tox21 10K compound library for agonists and antagonists of the estrogen receptor alpha signaling pathway , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[27]  David M. Reif,et al.  Profiling 976 ToxCast Chemicals across 331 Enzymatic and Receptor Signaling Assays , 2013, Chemical research in toxicology.

[28]  Robert J Kavlock,et al.  Integration of dosimetry, exposure, and high-throughput screening data in chemical toxicity assessment. , 2012, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[29]  D. Dix,et al.  The ToxCast program for prioritizing toxicity testing of environmental chemicals. , 2007, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[30]  Judy Strickland,et al.  A Curated Database of Rodent Uterotrophic Bioactivity , 2015, Environmental health perspectives.

[31]  M. Kimura,et al.  A Model Transgenic Cereal Plant with Detoxification Activity for the Estrogenic Mycotoxin Zearalenone , 2005, Transgenic Research.

[32]  Melvin E. Andersen,et al.  Incorporating New Technologies Into Toxicity Testing and Risk Assessment: Moving From 21st Century Vision to a Data-Driven Framework , 2013, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[33]  David M. Reif,et al.  Update on EPA's ToxCast program: providing high throughput decision support tools for chemical risk management. , 2012, Chemical research in toxicology.

[34]  R. Judson,et al.  Estimating toxicity-related biological pathway altering doses for high-throughput chemical risk assessment. , 2011, Chemical research in toxicology.

[35]  Ruili Huang,et al.  A Data Analysis Pipeline Accounting for Artifacts in Tox21 Quantitative High-Throughput Screening Assays , 2015, Journal of biomolecular screening.

[36]  Fabio Stossi,et al.  Defining estrogenic mechanisms of bisphenol A analogs through high throughput microscopy-based contextual assays. , 2014, Chemistry & biology.

[37]  K. Umesono,et al.  The nuclear receptor superfamily: The second decade , 1995, Cell.

[38]  Benita S Katzenellenbogen,et al.  Estrogen receptor transcription and transactivation: Estrogen receptor alpha and estrogen receptor beta - regulation by selective estrogen receptor modulators and importance in breast cancer , 2000, Breast Cancer Research.

[39]  James Inglese,et al.  A specific mechanism for nonspecific activation in reporter-gene assays. , 2008, ACS chemical biology.

[40]  Robert J Kavlock,et al.  Incorporating human dosimetry and exposure into high-throughput in vitro toxicity screening. , 2010, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[41]  Christopher P Austin,et al.  High-throughput screening assays for the identification of chemical probes. , 2007, Nature chemical biology.

[42]  R. Tibshirani Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso , 1996 .

[43]  R. L. Guével,et al.  Assessment of oestrogenic potency of chemicals used as growth promoter by in-vitro methods , 2001 .

[44]  Patience Browne,et al.  Screening Chemicals for Estrogen Receptor Bioactivity Using a Computational Model. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[45]  Robert J Kavlock,et al.  Real-time growth kinetics measuring hormone mimicry for ToxCast chemicals in T-47D human ductal carcinoma cells. , 2013, Chemical research in toxicology.

[46]  Ruili Huang,et al.  Predictive endocrine testing in the 21st century using in vitro assays of estrogen receptor signaling responses. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.