Gap analysis of application landscapes

For many enterprises the introduction of service orientation is still a daunting task and there is often no distinct idea of how to approach respective projects. Only recently, SOA research addresses this open and essential question and systematic methodologies for SOA introduction and evolution have been conceived. IBM's SOMA and sd&m's Quasar Enterprise are prominent examples. In practice, these methodologies have to rely on a variety of enterprise-specific information and integrate a number of different architectural instruments. This contribution introduces one typical constituent of evolution towards service orientation making extensive use of enterprise-specific information. The presented approach and prototypical implementation for the gap analysis of current and ideal application landscapes can also be regarded as a building block for more general architecture development methodologies like for example proposed by the TOGAF Architecture Development Method. The gap analysis measures the distance between two states of the application landscape by applying and aggregating a set of metrics specifically aimed at the context of architecture development. It results in a list of concrete actions which can be considered for landscape migration planning and hence can be a helpful instrument for enterprise architects.

[1]  Ali Arsanjani,et al.  SOMA: A method for developing service-oriented solutions , 2008, IBM Syst. J..

[2]  Florian Matthes,et al.  Generating Visualizations of Enterprise Architectures using Model Transformations , 2007, Enterp. Model. Inf. Syst. Archit. Int. J. Concept. Model..

[3]  Magnus Gammelgård,et al.  An IT management assessment framework: evaluating enterprise architecture scenarios , 2007, Inf. Syst. E Bus. Manag..

[4]  John C. Henderson,et al.  Strategic Alignment: Leveraging Information Technology for Transforming Organizations , 1993, IBM Syst. J..

[5]  Walter R. Bischofberger,et al.  Sotograph - A Pragmatic Approach to Source Code Architecture Conformance Checking , 2004, EWSA.

[6]  Dirk Krafzig,et al.  Enterprise SOA: Service-Oriented Architecture Best Practices , 2004 .

[7]  Gregor Engels,et al.  Quasar Enterprise - Anwendungslandschaften serviceorientiert gestalten , 2008, Software Engineering.

[8]  Quan Z. Sheng,et al.  Quality driven web services composition , 2003, WWW '03.

[9]  Christian M. Schweda,et al.  Using Metrics to Evaluate Failure Propagation and Failure Impacts in Application Landscapes , 2008, Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik.

[10]  Gregor Engels,et al.  Structuring Software Cities A Multidimensional Approach , 2007, 11th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC 2007).

[11]  Ulrike Steffens,et al.  Supporting Landscape Dependent Evaluation of Enterprise Applications , 2008, Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik.

[12]  Chris F. Kemerer,et al.  Reliability of function points measurement: a field experiment , 2015, CACM.

[13]  D. Ross Jeffery,et al.  Function Points in the Estimation and Evaluation of the Software Process , 1990, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..