A collaborative design process model in the sociotechnical engineering design framework

Collaborative engineering design involves various stakeholders with different perspectives. The design process is relatively complex and difficult to handle. Various conflicts always happen among the design tasks and affect the design team performance. Therefore, to represent the collaborative design process and capture the evolution of design perspectives in a structured way, it is critical to manage the design conflicts and improve the collaborative design productivity. This article provides a generic collaborative design process model based on a sociotechnical design framework. This model has a topological format and adopts process analysis techniques from Petri Nets. By addressing both the technical and social aspects of collaborative design activities, it provides a mechanism to identify the interdependencies among design tasks and perspectives of different stakeholders. Based on this design process model, a methodology of detecting and handling the design conflicts is developed to support collaborative design coordination.

[1]  Ken Binmore,et al.  Why game theory "doesn't work" , 1987 .

[2]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[3]  Firdaus E. Udwadia,et al.  A Methodology for Collaborative Design Process and Conflict Analysis , 2000 .

[4]  René David,et al.  Petri nets and grafcet - tools for modelling discrete event systems , 1992 .

[5]  Victor Sanvido,et al.  Integrated Design-Process Model , 1994 .

[6]  J. A. Wall,et al.  Conflict and Its Management , 1995 .

[7]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Generalized models of design iteration using signal flow graphs , 1995 .

[8]  Mark Klein Conflict management as part of an integrated exception handling approach , 1995, Artif. Intell. Eng. Des. Anal. Manuf..

[9]  Srikanth M. Kannapan,et al.  The Interplay of Context, Process, and Conflict in Concurrent Engineering , 1994 .

[10]  Mark Klein Conflict Management as Part of an Integrated Exception Handling Approach , 2000, Computational Conflicts.

[11]  P. Berger,et al.  The Social Construction of Reality , 1966 .

[12]  Ram D. Sriram,et al.  Conflict mitigation system for collaborative engineering , 1995, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[13]  Kemper Lewis,et al.  Collaborative, sequential, and isolated decisions in design , 1997 .

[14]  Sarit Kraus,et al.  Multiagent Negotiation under Time Constraints , 1995, Artif. Intell..

[15]  Kurt Jensen,et al.  Coloured Petri nets (2nd ed.): basic concepts, analysis methods and practical use: volume 1 , 1996 .

[16]  Charles J. Petrie,et al.  Using Pareto optimality to coordinate distributed agents , 1995, Artif. Intell. Eng. Des. Anal. Manuf..

[17]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  A Model-Based Framework to Overlap Product Development Activities , 1997 .

[18]  Paul S. Adler,et al.  From project to process management: an empirically-based framework for analyzing product development time , 1995 .

[19]  Wolfgang Beitz,et al.  Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach , 1984 .

[20]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  Designing Design Processes in Decision-Based Concurrent Engineering , 1991 .

[21]  Susan Carlson Skalak House of Quality , 2002 .