Impervious surface impacts to runoff and sediment discharge under laboratory rainfall simulation

Abstract Urbanization of watersheds previously managed for agricultural uses results in hydrologic changes associated with increased flooding and erosion. Few studies have been conducted to quantify these effects under controlled conditions and standard rainfall simulation methodologies have not been previously established. In this study, a laboratory rainfall simulation procedure was developed and utilized to evaluate hydrologic and sheet erosional responses to various configurations of impervious surface cover at the small scale. Runoff and sediment losses from a sloped (5%) cascade of soil boxes having 50% impervious cover located at the top of the slope or at the bottom of the slope, or having 0% impervious cover were measured. Results indicate that the 50% upslope impervious treatment generated sediment at 3–5 times the rate of the 50% downslope impervious treatment. Upslope impervious cover resulted in initially lower water runoff rates than channel development, but this effect narrowed or reversed with continued rainfall. These results suggest that upslope impervious surfaces may represent a larger total on-site erosion risk than equivalent impervious surfaces located at lower positions along the slope, especially under high antecedent soil moisture and/or high intensity rainfall.

[1]  W. Shuster,et al.  Impacts of impervious surface on watershed hydrology: A review , 2005 .

[2]  Vladimir Novotny,et al.  Risk based urban watershed management under conflicting objectives. , 2001, Water Science and Technology.

[3]  W. O. Thomas,et al.  Flood Characteristics of Urban Watersheds in the United States , 1983 .

[4]  James P. Heaney,et al.  Estimation of Urban Imperviousness and its Impacts on Storm Water Systems , 2003 .

[5]  C. Jackson,et al.  URBANIZATION OF AQUATIC SYSTEMS: DEGRADATION THRESHOLDS, STORMWATER DETECTION, AND THE LIMITS OF MITIGATION 1 , 1997 .

[6]  Derek B. Booth,et al.  Sediment sources in an urbanizing, mixed land-use watershed , 2002 .

[7]  G. Hodgkins,et al.  Evaluation of the Effects of Development on Peak-Flow Hydrographs for Collyer Brook, Maine , 2001 .

[8]  S. Johnson,et al.  Effects of Urbanization on Floods in the Houston, Texas Metropolitan Area , 1973 .

[9]  M. L. Voorhees,et al.  Conventional Urbanization and Its Effect on Storm Runoff , 1976 .

[10]  M. Doyle,et al.  EXAMINING THE EFFECTS OF URBANIZATION ON STREAMS USING INDICATORS OF GEOMORPHIC STABILITY , 2000 .

[11]  J. David Allan,et al.  Assessing Biotic Integrity of Streams: Effects of Scale in Measuring the Influence of Land Use/Cover and Habitat Structure on Fish and Macroinvertebrates , 1999, Environmental management.

[12]  David R. Montgomery,et al.  URBANIZATION, FLOOD FREQUENCY, AND SALMON ABUNDANCE IN PUGET LOWLAND STREAMS 1 , 1997 .

[13]  Michael H. Kutner.  Applied Linear Statistical Models , 1974 .

[14]  A. Pandit,et al.  What is the Impervious Area Curve Number , 1998 .

[15]  Richard Burrows,et al.  The management of sediment in combined sewers , 2000 .

[16]  J. Lyons,et al.  Impacts of Urbanization on Stream Habitat and Fish Across Multiple Spatial Scales , 2001, Environmental management.

[17]  F. H. Newell,et al.  United States Geological Survey , 1900, Nature.

[18]  V. Barnett,et al.  Applied Linear Statistical Models , 1975 .

[19]  Richard Field,et al.  POROUS PAVEMENT: RESEARCH; DEVELOPMENT; AND DEMONSTRATION , 1982 .