A new neck injury criterion in combined vertical/frontal crashes with head supported mass

This study developed a new neck injury risk function suitable for use in frontal crashes with occupant orientation ranging from predominantly horizontal to predominantly vertical in the occupant anterior-posterior (A/P) direction. In this study, 36 cadaveric head/neck complexes and 6 whole cadavers were tested under impact scenarios with varying total head mounted mass and center of gravity locations. Matched Hybrid III and THOR dummy tests were also performed. The resulting injury criterion is based on a beam model of the lower cervical spine and is expressed in mathematical form. The calculated values were comparable to single axis injury tolerance values described in the literature and in existing motor vehicle injury standards for the upper cervical spine (FMVSS-208, 2003). Beam criterion values (BC) of 1.0 correspond to a 50% risk of an AIS 2 injury in the human cervical spine. The THOR dummy was found to reproduce the kinematics of the cadaver better than did the Hybrid III dummy. However, response curves showed differences between the THOR and the cadaver that were due to anatomy. For the covering abstract see ITRD E141569.

[1]  Harold J. Mertz,et al.  INJURY RISK CURVES FOR CHILDREN AND ADULTS IN FRONTAL AND REAR COLLISIONS , 1997 .

[2]  H J Mertz,et al.  An Assessment of Compressive Neck Loads Under Injury-Producing Conditions. , 1978, The Physician and sportsmedicine.

[3]  H. Hansson,et al.  Pressure Effects in the Spinal Canal During Whiplash Extension Motion - A Possible Cause of Injury to the Cervical Spinal Ganglia , 1993 .

[4]  P. V. Rao,et al.  Applied Survival Analysis: Regression Modeling of Time to Event Data , 2000 .

[5]  Erik G. Takhounts,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF IMPROVED INJURY CRITERIA FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF ADVANCED AUTOMOTIVE RESTRAINT SYSTEMS - II , 1999 .

[6]  A I King,et al.  Correlation of field injuries and GM hybrid III dummy responses for lap-shoulder belt restraint. , 1980, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[7]  Richard M. Morgan,et al.  Injuries to the cervical spine caused by a distributed frontal load to the chest , 1982 .

[8]  Michael Kleinberger,et al.  THE DYNAMIC RESPONSES OF THE CERVICAL SPINE: BUCKLING, END CONDITIONS, AND TOLERANCE IN COMPRESSIVE IMPACTS , 1997 .

[9]  D. J. Thomas,et al.  Human Volunteer Head-Neck Response in Frontal Flexion: a New Analysis , 1995 .

[10]  Anders Kullgren,et al.  NEW AIS1 LONG-TERM NECK INJURY CRITERIA CANDIDATES BASED ON REAL FRONTAL CRASH ANALYSIS , 2000 .

[11]  J. Cusick,et al.  Biomechanical analyses of whiplash injuries using an experimental model. , 2002, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[12]  Peter Niederer,et al.  A NEW NECK INJURY CRITERION CANDIDATE FOR REAR-END COLLISIONS TAKING INTO ACCOUNT SHEAR FORCES AND BENDING MOMENTS , 2001 .

[13]  Roger P. Daniel,et al.  A Biomechanical Analysis of Head, Neck, and Torso Injuries to Child Surrogates Due to Sudden Torso Acceleration , 1984 .

[14]  Dennis F. Shanahan,et al.  Mass Requirements for Helicopter Aircrew Helmets , 1997 .

[15]  L. M. Patrick,et al.  Strength and response of the human neck , 1971 .