Separating the FN400 and N400 potentials across recognition memory experiments

There is a growing debate as to whether frontally distributed FN400 potentials reflect familiarity-based recognition or are functionally identical to centro-parietal N400 reflecting semantic processing. We conducted two experiments in which event-related potentials (ERPs) associated with semantic priming and recognition were recorded, either when priming was embedded within a recognition test (Experiment 1), or when these two phases were separated (Experiment 2). In Experiment 1, we observed 300-500 ms differences between primed and unprimed old words as well as differences between old and new primed words, but these two effects did not differ topographically and both showed midline central maxima. In Experiment 2, the N400 for priming was recorded exclusively during encoding and again showed a midline central distribution. The ERP component of recognition was only found for unrelated words (not primed previously during encoding), and also showed a midline central maximum, but, in addition, was present in the left frontal area of the scalp. Conversely, the priming effect was absent in the left frontal cluster. This pattern of results indicate that FN400 and N400 potentials share similar neural generators; but when priming and recognition are not confounded, these potentials do not entirely overlap in terms of topographical distribution and presumably reflect functionally distinct processes.

[1]  Hubert D. Zimmer,et al.  Has the butcher on the bus dyed his hair? When color changes modulate ERP correlates of familiarity and recollection , 2006, NeuroImage.

[2]  D. Tucker,et al.  Spatial sampling and filtering of EEG with spline Laplacians to estimate cortical potentials , 2005, Brain Topography.

[3]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  Dissociation of the neural correlates of implicit and explicit memory , 1998, Nature.

[4]  L. Jacoby,et al.  On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[5]  Joel L. Voss,et al.  Validating neural correlates of familiarity , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[6]  P. Suppes,et al.  Contemporary Developments in Mathematical Psychology , 1976 .

[7]  A P Yonelinas,et al.  The contribution of recollection and familiarity to recognition and source-memory judgments: a formal dual-process model and an analysis of receiver operating characteristics. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[8]  David I. Donaldson,et al.  Dissociating recollection from familiarity: Electrophysiological evidence that familiarity for faces is associated with a posterior old/new effect , 2007, NeuroImage.

[9]  G. Mandler Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. , 1980 .

[10]  Tim Curran,et al.  Picture Superiority Doubly Dissociates the ERP Correlates of Recollection and Familiarity , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[11]  David I. Donaldson,et al.  Examining the neural basis of episodic memory: ERP evidence that faces are recollected differently from names , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[12]  C. C. Wood,et al.  Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: an ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[13]  Joseph Dien,et al.  Issues in the application of the average reference: Review, critiques, and recommendations , 1998 .

[14]  Hubert D. Zimmer,et al.  The influence of object and background color manipulations on the electrophysiological indices of recognition memory , 2007, Brain Research.

[15]  M. Rugg,et al.  Event-related potentials and recognition memory , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  Markus Kiefer,et al.  Right Hemisphere Activation during Indirect Semantic Priming: Evidence from Event-Related Potentials , 1998, Brain and Language.

[17]  Ingo G. Meister,et al.  A repetition suppression effect lasting several days within the semantic network , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  Richard C. Atkinson,et al.  Search and decision processes in recognition memory. , 1974 .

[19]  Thomas A. Schreiber,et al.  The University of South Florida free association, rhyme, and word fragment norms , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[20]  S. Dopkins,et al.  Level of Discrimination for Recognition Judgments Reduced following the Recognition of Semantically Related Words. , 2007, Journal of memory and language.

[21]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  FN400 potentials are functionally identical to N400 potentials and reflect semantic processing during recognition testing. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[22]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). , 2011, Annual review of psychology.

[23]  Hubert D. Zimmer,et al.  ERP Evidence for Flexible Adjustment of Retrieval Orientation and Its Influence on Familiarity , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[24]  D. Schacter,et al.  Interactions Between Forms of Memory: When Priming Hinders New Episodic Learning , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  D. Tucker Spatial sampling of head electrical fields: the geodesic sensor net. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[26]  Ken A. Paller,et al.  Remembering and knowing: Electrophysiological distinctions at encoding but not retrieval , 2009, NeuroImage.

[27]  Regine Bader,et al.  The FN400 is functionally distinct from the N400 , 2012, NeuroImage.

[28]  Ken A Paller,et al.  The neural basis of the butcher-on-the-bus phenomenon: when a face seems familiar but is not remembered , 2004, NeuroImage.

[29]  E. Wilding The practice of rescaling scalp-recorded event-related potentials , 2006, Biological Psychology.

[30]  A. Yonelinas The Nature of Recollection and Familiarity: A Review of 30 Years of Research , 2002 .

[31]  M. Junghöfer,et al.  The polar average reference effect: a bias in estimating the head surface integral in EEG recording , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[32]  Astrid M. Schloerscheidt,et al.  The impact of change in stimulus format on the electrophysiological indices of recognition , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[33]  D. Schacter,et al.  Functional MRI evidence for a role of frontal and inferior temporal cortex in amodal components of priming. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[34]  J. Grafman,et al.  Summation Priming and Coarse Semantic Coding in the Right Hemisphere , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[35]  J. Kounios,et al.  Concreteness effects in semantic processing: ERP evidence supporting dual-coding theory. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[36]  M. W. Brown,et al.  Episodic memory, amnesia, and the hippocampal–anterior thalamic axis , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[37]  T. Curran Brain potentials of recollection and familiarity , 2000, Memory & cognition.