Jet Ventilation Reduces Coronary Sinus Movement in Patients Undergoing Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: An Observational Crossover Study

Background: One of the reasons that high-frequency jet ventilation (HFJV) is used is due to the near immobility of thoracic structures. However, no study has quantified the movements of cardiac structures during HFJV compared with normal mechanical ventilation. Methods: After ethical approval and written informed consent, we included 21 patients scheduled for atrial fibrillation ablation in this prospective crossover study. Each patient was ventilated with both normal mechanical ventilation and HFJV. During each ventilation mode, displacements of the cardiac structure were measured by the EnSite Precision mapping system using a catheter placed in the coronary sinus. Results: The median [Q1–Q4] displacement was 2.0 [0.6–2.8] mm during HFJV and 10.5 [9.3–13.0] mm during conventional ventilation (p < 0.000001). Conclusion: This study quantifies the minimal movement of cardiac structures during HFJV compared to standard mechanical ventilation.

[1]  G. Panza,et al.  Anesthetic Considerations in the Electrophysiology Laboratory: A Comprehensive Review. , 2022, Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia.

[2]  Savalan Babapoor-Farrokhran,et al.  Utility of High-frequency Jet Ventilation in Atrial Fibrillation Ablation , 2021, The Journal of innovations in cardiac rhythm management.

[3]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). , 2020, European heart journal.

[4]  A. Aizer,et al.  Rapid pacing and high‐frequency jet ventilation additively improve catheter stability during atrial fibrillation ablation , 2020, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[5]  G. Hindricks,et al.  Effect of Catheter Ablation vs Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy on Mortality, Stroke, Bleeding, and Cardiac Arrest Among Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: The CABANA Randomized Clinical Trial , 2019, JAMA.

[6]  N. Trayanova,et al.  Initiation of a High-Frequency Jet Ventilation Strategy for Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: Safety and Outcomes Data. , 2018, JACC. Clinical electrophysiology.

[7]  P. Sultan,et al.  High-Frequency Jet Ventilation During Cryoablation of Small Renal Tumours , 2018, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology.

[8]  S. Fujii,et al.  Anesthesia for Cardiac Ablation. , 2017, Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia.

[9]  M. Chung,et al.  2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation , 2017, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[10]  J. Jakobsson,et al.  High frequency jet ventilation for motion management during ablation procedures, a narrative review , 2017, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[11]  S. Kaneko,et al.  General anesthesia improves contact force and reduces gap formation in pulmonary vein isolation: a comparison with conscious sedation , 2017, Heart and Vessels.

[12]  C. Murray,et al.  Worldwide Epidemiology of Atrial Fibrillation: A Global Burden of Disease 2010 Study , 2014, Circulation.

[13]  Rafael Duran,et al.  Use of High-Frequency Jet Ventilation for Percutaneous Tumor Ablation , 2014, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology.

[14]  Sanjay Dixit,et al.  Efforts to enhance catheter stability improve atrial fibrillation ablation outcome. , 2013, Heart rhythm.

[15]  N. Elkassabany,et al.  The use of high-frequency jet ventilation for out of operating room anesthesia , 2012, Current opinion in anaesthesiology.

[16]  Geoffrey Lee,et al.  Effect of respiration on catheter-tissue contact force during ablation of atrial arrhythmias. , 2012, Heart rhythm.

[17]  R. Speck,et al.  Anesthetic management of patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation for treatment of atrial fibrillation using high-frequency jet ventilation. , 2012, Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia.

[18]  J. Burkhardt,et al.  General anesthesia reduces the prevalence of pulmonary vein reconnection during repeat ablation when compared with conscious sedation: results from a randomized study. , 2011, Heart rhythm.

[19]  C. Miao,et al.  The comparison of various ventilation modes and the association of risk factors with CO2 retention during suspension laryngoscopy , 2011, The Laryngoscope.

[20]  Burr Hall,et al.  Comparison of antiarrhythmic drug therapy and radiofrequency catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a randomized controlled trial. , 2010, JAMA.

[21]  K. V. Van Arsdalen,et al.  High-frequency jet ventilation is beneficial during shock wave lithotripsy utilizing a newer unit with a narrower focal zone. , 2009, Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada.

[22]  D. Schwartzman,et al.  High-frequency jet ventilation: utility in posterior left atrial catheter ablation. , 2006, Heart rhythm.

[23]  U. Kongsgaard,et al.  [Jet ventilation]. , 1990, Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke.

[24]  D. Coppel,et al.  High frequency jet ventilation , 1984, Anaesthesia.

[25]  G. Carlon,et al.  High-Frequency Jet Ventilation: A Prospective Randomized Evaluation , 1983 .