Local brightness mechanisms sketch out surfaces but do not fill them in: Psychophysical evidence in the Kanizsa square

In two experiments, brightness enhancement of the illusory surface in the Kanizsa square was investigated by means of a brightness matching procedure. The results show that specific properties of the inducing elements such as size, spacing, and luminance have effects on the matching threshold that are similar to those previously obtained in experiments on simultaneous con trast. The data from a third experiment demonstrate that increment thresholds measured within the Kanizsa square are elevated when the target is flashed on a position close to the inducing elements. The thresholds decrease considerably in the center of both test and control figures (representing or not representing an illusory square). These observations suggest that low-level mechanisms are likely to explain local brightness differences within the configurations but not global figure brightness. In other words, local contrast seems to generate brightness information that “sketches out” surfaces at their surrounds but does not “fill” them “in.”

[1]  C. Tyler Analysis of visual modulation sensitivity. III. Meridional variations in peripheral flicker sensitivity. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[2]  R. Jung Visual Perception and Neurophysiology , 1973 .

[3]  L. Spillmann,et al.  Brightness contrast in the Ehrenstein illusion , 1976, Vision Research.

[4]  G. Kanizsa Margini Quasi-percettivi in Campi con Stimolazione Omogenea , 1955 .

[5]  S. Ullman Visual routines , 1984, Cognition.

[6]  T. Cornsweet,et al.  Relation of increment thresholds to brightness and luminance. , 1965, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[7]  L. Spillmann,et al.  Brightness Matching, Brightness Cancellation, and Increment Threshold in the Ehrenstein Illusion , 1984, Perception.

[8]  S. Grossberg,et al.  Neural dynamics of form perception: boundary completion, illusory figures, and neon color spreading. , 1985 .

[9]  A. Fiorentini Mach Band Phenomena , 1972 .

[10]  Claude Bonnet,et al.  Psychophysical evidence for low-level processing of illusory contours and surfaces in the kanizsa square , 1991, Vision Research.

[11]  E. G. Heinemann,et al.  Simultaneous brightness induction as a function of inducing and test-field luminances. , 1955, Journal of experimental psychology.

[12]  M. Jory Increment Thresholds in Illusory Contour Line Patterns , 1987 .

[13]  S. Novak,et al.  Detection thresholds within a display that manifests contour enhancement and brightness contrast. , 1974, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[14]  Eric G. Heinemann,et al.  Simultaneous Brightness Induction , 1972 .

[15]  T. Watanabe,et al.  Are Illusory Contours a Cause or a Consequence of Apparent Differences in Brightness and Depth in the Kanizsa Square? , 1988, Perception.

[16]  Stephen Grossberg,et al.  The Role of Illusory Contours in Visual Segmentation , 1987 .

[17]  C Bonnet,et al.  Apparent Brightness Enhancement in the Kanizsa Square with and without Illusory Contour Formation , 1990, Perception.

[18]  W. L. Brigner,et al.  Subjective Contour: Apparent Depth or Simultaneous Brightness Contrast? , 1974, Perceptual and motor skills.

[19]  J. Frisby,et al.  Illusory Contours: Curious Cases of Simultaneous Brightness Contrast? , 1975 .