The effect of background luminance on cone sensitivity functions.

Implementations of the Wald-Marré technique have employed fixed luminance backgrounds to isolate cone sensitivity mechanisms. We evaluated the effect of varying the adaptation level on the relative isolation of the different cone types. For MWS and LWS cone isolation we used a 15 Hz flickering test light to isolate the achromatic channel, and we modelled the resulting spectral sensitivity functions as a linear sum of LWS and MWS input. We found only mild improvement in relative cone isolation with increasing adaptation level. The LWS and MWS cone mechanisms showed decreasing sensitivity with adaptation level and reached limiting Weber behavior above 1000 Td. SWS cones were isolated with a 2.4 Hz flickering light. SWS cone isolation improved with adapting level, reaching a plateau above 1000 Td. The SWS cone mechanism showed decreasing sensitivity with adaptation level but did not reach a limiting Weber region. Our data indicate that the use of fixed high adaptation levels has different effects on the cone mechanisms. Absolute sensitivity loss for LWS or MWS mechanism will not be revealed. LWS and MWS thresholds will appear normal unless there is an adaptation abnormality. On the other hand, the SWS cone thresholds would be sensitive to both absolute and increment sensitivity loss. More than one adaptation condition is needed to separate different types of sensitivity loss characteristic of eye disease.

[1]  R. Harwerth,et al.  Differential Adaptation of Cone Mechanisms Explains the Preferential Loss of Short-Wavelength Cone Sensitivity in Retinal Disease , 1989 .

[2]  R. Carr,et al.  A Comparison of S Cone Pathway Sensitivity Loss in Patients with Diabetes and Retinitis Pigmentosa , 1989 .

[3]  R. Carr,et al.  Foveal sensitivity changes in retinitis pigmentosa. , 1987, Applied optics.

[4]  J. Pokorny,et al.  IMPROVED CLINICAL TECHNIQUE FOR WALD-MARRE FUNCTIONS , 1987 .

[5]  A. Eisner Comparison of flicker-photometric and flicker-threshold spectral sensitivities while the eye is adapted to colored backgrounds. , 1982, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[6]  C. R. Ingling,et al.  Stiles’s π 5 mechanism: failure to show univariance is caused by opponent-channel input , 1981 .

[7]  D. Macleod,et al.  Flicker photometric study of chromatic adaption: selective suppression of cone inputs by colored backgrounds. , 1981, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[8]  D H Kelly,et al.  Two-band model of heterochromatic flicker. , 1977, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[9]  P. King-Smith,et al.  Luminance and opponent-color contributions to visual detection and adaptation and to temporal and spatial integration. , 1976, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[10]  J. Pokorny,et al.  Spectral sensitivity of color-blind observers and the cone photopigments. , 1972, Vision research.

[11]  M. Marrè Clinical examination of the three color vision mechanisms in acquired color vision defects. , 1972, Modern problems in ophthalmology.

[12]  M. Marrè,et al.  The influence of the three color vision-mechanisms on the spectral sensitivity of the fovea. , 1972, Modern problems in ophthalmology.

[13]  G Wald,et al.  Defective color vision and its inheritance. , 1966, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  G. Wald THE RECEPTORS OF HUMAN COLOR VISION. , 1964, Science.