Lekking as collective behaviour

Lekking is a spectacular mating system in which males maintain tightly organized clustering of territories during the mating season, and females visit these leks for mating. Various hypotheses—ranging from predation dilution to mate choice and mating benefit—offer potential explanations for the evolution of this peculiar mating system. However, many of these classic hypotheses rarely consider the spatial dynamics that produce and maintain the lek. In this article, we propose to view lekking through the perspective of collective behaviour, in which simple local interactions between organisms, as well as habitat, likely produce and maintain lekking. Further, we argue that interactions within the leks change over time, typically over a breeding season, to produce many broad-level as well as specific collective patterns. To test these ideas at both proximate and ultimate levels, we argue that the concepts and tools from the literature on collective animal behaviour, such as agent-based models and high-resolution video tracking that enables capturing fine-scale spatio-temporal interactions, could be useful. To demonstrate the promise of these ideas, we develop a spatially explicit agent-based model and show how simple rules such as spatial fidelity, local social interactions and repulsion among males can potentially explain the formation of lek and synchronous departures of males for foraging from the lek. On the empirical side, we discuss the promise of applying the collective behaviour approach to blackbuck (Antilope cervicapra) leks—using high-resolution recordings via a camera fitted to unmanned aerial vehicles and subsequent tracking of animal movements. Broadly, we suggest that a lens of collective behaviour may provide novel insights into understanding both the proximate and ultimate factors that shape leks. This article is part of a discussion meeting issue ‘Collective behaviour through time’.

[1]  Liam R. Dougherty Meta-analysis reveals that animal sexual signalling behaviour is honest and resource based , 2021, Nature Ecology & Evolution.

[2]  K. Isvaran Lek Territory Size and the Evolution of Leks: A Model and a Test Using an Ungulate With a Flexible Mating System , 2021, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution.

[3]  K. Isvaran The Lekking Puzzle , 2020 .

[4]  Colin J. Torney,et al.  Multi-Object Tracking in Heterogeneous environments (MOTHe) for animal video recordings , 2020, bioRxiv.

[5]  V. Guttal,et al.  Noise-induced schooling of fish , 2019, Nature Physics.

[6]  C. Hemelrijk,et al.  Complex patterns of collective escape in starling flocks under predation , 2019, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[7]  E. DuVal,et al.  The spatial dynamics of female choice in an exploded lek generate benefits of aggregation for experienced males , 2018, Animal Behaviour.

[8]  J. Herbert-Read Understanding how animal groups achieve coordinated movement , 2016, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[9]  I. Couzin,et al.  Shared decision-making drives collective movement in wild baboons , 2015, Science.

[10]  I. Couzin,et al.  Predatory Fish Select for Coordinated Collective Motion in Virtual Prey , 2012, Science.

[11]  G. Bota,et al.  Ranging behaviour of little bustard males, Tetrax tetrax, in the lekking grounds , 2012, Behavioural Processes.

[12]  Guy Theraulaz,et al.  Deciphering Interactions in Moving Animal Groups , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[13]  G. Parisi,et al.  FROM EMPIRICAL DATA TO INTER-INDIVIDUAL INTERACTIONS: UNVEILING THE RULES OF COLLECTIVE ANIMAL BEHAVIOR , 2010 .

[14]  I. Couzin,et al.  Social interactions, information use, and the evolution of collective migration , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Carlos Palacín,et al.  Correlates of male mating success in great bustard leks: the effects of age, weight, and display effort , 2010, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[16]  Bette A. Loiselle,et al.  It takes two to tango: reproductive skew and social correlates of male mating success in a lek-breeding bird , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[17]  B. Kempenaers,et al.  Sexual selection in a lekking bird: the relative opportunity for selection by female choice and male competition , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[18]  Irene Giardina,et al.  Collective behavior in animal groups: Theoretical models and empirical studies , 2008, HFSP journal.

[19]  M. Avery Lekking in birds: choice, competition and reproductive constraints , 2008 .

[20]  K. Isvaran Intraspecific variation in group size in the blackbuck antelope: the roles of habitat structure and forage at different spatial scales , 2007, Oecologia.

[21]  F. Jiguet,et al.  Manipulating Lek Size and Composition Using Decoys: An Experimental Investigation of Lek Evolution Models , 2006, The American Naturalist.

[22]  D. Sumpter The principles of collective animal behaviour , 2006, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  L. Conradt,et al.  Consensus decision making in animals. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[24]  I. Couzin,et al.  Effective leadership and decision-making in animal groups on the move , 2005, Nature.

[25]  J. Bro-Jørgensen No peace for estrous topi cows on leks , 2003 .

[26]  I. Couzin,et al.  Collective memory and spatial sorting in animal groups. , 2002, Journal of theoretical biology.

[27]  A. von Haeseler,et al.  Territory establishment in lekking marine iguanas, Amblyrhynchus cristatus: support for the hotshot mechanism , 2002, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[28]  F. Jiguet,et al.  Courtship behaviour in a lekking species: individual variations and settlement tactics in male little bustard , 2001, Behavioural Processes.

[29]  I. Owens,et al.  Size and stability of vertebrate leks , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[30]  J. Kålås,et al.  Pushy males and choosy females: courtship disruption and mate choice in the lekking great snipe , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[31]  L. Edelstein-Keshet,et al.  Complexity, pattern, and evolutionary trade-offs in animal aggregation. , 1999, Science.

[32]  T. Jones,et al.  Fisherian flies: benefits of female choice in a lekking sandfly , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[33]  J. Höglund,et al.  Behaviourally mediated sexual selection: characteristics of successful male black grouse , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[34]  H. Kokko The Lekking Game: Can Female Choice Explain Aggregated Male Displays? , 1997 .

[35]  R. Gibson,et al.  A re-evaluation of hotspot settlement in lekking sage grouse , 1996, Animal Behaviour.

[36]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Black hole models of ungulate lek size and distribution , 1996, Animal Behaviour.

[37]  C. Carbone,et al.  Mate choice or harassment avoidance? A question of female control at the lek , 1996 .

[38]  S. Gueron,et al.  The Dynamics of Herds: From Individuals to Aggregations , 1996 .

[39]  R. Nefdt Disruptions of matings, harassment and lek-breeding in Kafue lechwe antelope , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[40]  J. Höglund,et al.  Lek centre attracts black grouse females , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[41]  D. Westcott Leks of leks: a role for hotspots in lek evolution? , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[42]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Testing hotspot models of lek evolution: data from three species of ungulates , 1993, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[43]  E. J. Oakes Lekking and the Evolution of Sexual Dimorphism in Birds: Comparative Approaches , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[44]  J. Kålås,et al.  The costs of secondary sexual characters in the lekking great snipe (Gallinago media) , 1992, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[45]  A. Balmford Mate choice on leks. , 1991, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[46]  David R. Jefferson,et al.  Lek formation by female choice: a simulation study , 1990 .

[47]  T. Clutton‐Brock Review Lecture: Mammalian mating systems , 1989, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. B. Biological Sciences.

[48]  M. Petrie,et al.  Lekking in topi: a high cost, specialist strategy , 1987, Animal Behaviour.

[49]  J. Bradbury,et al.  Sexual selection in lekking sage grouse: phenotypic correlates of male mating success , 1985, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[50]  S. Emlen,et al.  Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. , 1977, Science.

[51]  K. Isvaran Variation in male mating behaviour within ungulate populations: patterns and processes , 2005 .

[52]  K. Isvaran Female grouping best predicts lekking in blackbuck (Antilope cervicapra) , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[53]  I. Couzin,et al.  Self-Organization and Collective Behavior in Vertebrates , 2003 .

[54]  Y. Jhala,et al.  Variation in lekking costs in blackbuck (Antilope cervicapra): Relationship to lek-territory location and female mating patterns , 2000 .

[55]  F. Widemo,et al.  Lek size, male mating skew and the evolution of lekking , 1995, Nature.