Using Global Sequence Similarity to Enhance Biological Sequence Labeling

Identifying functionally important sites from biological sequences, formulated as a biological sequence labeling problem, has broad applications ranging from rational drug design to the analysis of metabolic and signal transduction networks. In this paper, we present an approach to biological sequence labeling that takes into account the global similarity between biological sequences. Our approach combines unsupervised and supervised learning techniques. Given a set of sequences and a similarity measure defined on pairs of sequences, we learn a mixture of experts model by using spectral clustering to learn the hierarchical structure of the model and by using bayesian approaches to combine the predictions of the experts. We evaluate our approach on two important biological sequence labeling problems: RNA-protein and DNA-protein interface prediction problems. The results of our experiments show that global sequence similarity can be exploited to improve the performance of classifiers trained to label biological sequence data.

[1]  James A. Casbon,et al.  Spectral clustering of protein sequences , 2006, Nucleic acids research.

[2]  Y. Shamoo,et al.  Structure-based analysis of protein-RNA interactions using the program ENTANGLE. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[3]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .

[4]  Vasant Honavar,et al.  Assessing the Performance of Macromolecular Sequence Classifiers , 2007, 2007 IEEE 7th International Symposium on BioInformatics and BioEngineering.

[5]  Thomas G. Dietterich What is machine learning? , 2020, Archives of Disease in Childhood.

[6]  Vasant Honavar,et al.  Glycosylation site prediction using ensembles of Support Vector Machine classifiers , 2007, BMC Bioinformatics.

[7]  Robert A. Jacobs,et al.  Hierarchical Mixtures of Experts and the EM Algorithm , 1993, Neural Computation.

[8]  Vasant G Honavar,et al.  Prediction of RNA binding sites in proteins from amino acid sequence. , 2006, RNA.

[9]  T. N. Bhat,et al.  The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[10]  David Chiu,et al.  BOOK REVIEW: "PATTERN CLASSIFICATION", R. O. DUDA, P. E. HART and D. G. STORK, Second Edition , 2001 .

[11]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  Normalized cuts and image segmentation , 1997, Proceedings of IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[12]  Pierre Baldi,et al.  Assessing the accuracy of prediction algorithms for classification: an overview , 2000, Bioinform..

[13]  Thomas G. Dietterich Multiple Classifier Systems , 2000, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[14]  Thomas G. Dietterich Machine Learning for Sequential Data: A Review , 2002, SSPR/SPR.

[15]  David G. Stork,et al.  Pattern Classification , 1973 .

[16]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Predicting the secondary structure of globular proteins using neural network models. , 1988, Journal of molecular biology.

[17]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  On Discriminative vs. Generative Classifiers: A comparison of logistic regression and naive Bayes , 2001, NIPS.

[18]  Bermseok Oh,et al.  Prediction of phosphorylation sites using SVMs , 2004, Bioinform..

[19]  Shigeo Abe DrEng Pattern Classification , 2001, Springer London.

[20]  Inderjit S. Dhillon,et al.  Co-clustering documents and words using bipartite spectral graph partitioning , 2001, KDD '01.