Results of Large-Scale Spacecraft Flammability Tests

The preliminary results for two flights of the Spacecraft Fire Experiment (Saffire), conducted on an orbiting spacecraft, are presented. These experiments directly address the risks associated with our understanding of spacecraft fire behavior at practical length scales and geometries. The lack of this experimental data has forced spacecraft designers to base their designs and safety precautions on 1-g understanding of flame spread, flame selfextinguishment, fire detection, and suppression. However, low-gravity combustion research has demonstrated substantial differences in flame behavior from its 1-g counterpart. Over the past several years, NASA and an international team of investigators have worked to address open issues in spacecraft fire safety. NASA’s Spacecraft Fire Safety Demonstration Project was developed with a goal to conduct a series of large-scale experiments in true confined spacecraft environments that represent practical spacecraft fires. The first two flights are complete and examined spread over a large thin sheet of flammable fuel (cotton/fiberglass 41 x 94 cm) and over 9 samples (5 x 29 cm) of various materials (silicone (4), polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) (2), cotton/fiberglass (2) and Nomex®) that addressed the conditions of NASA STD 6001 Test 1 (material flammability). These experiments were performed on two separate unmanned ISS re-supply spacecraft after they had delivered their cargo and had

[1]  Fletcher Miller,et al.  Experimental comparison of opposed and concurrent flame spread in a forced convective microgravity environment , 2009 .

[2]  Jose L. Torero,et al.  Phenomenological model of soot production inside a non-buoyant laminar diffusion flame , 2015 .

[3]  Hsin-Yi Shih,et al.  A comparison of extinction limits and spreading rates in opposed and concurrent spreading flames over thin solids , 2003 .

[4]  Paul V. Ferkul,et al.  Experimental Results on the Effect of Surface Structures on the Flame Propagation Velocity of PMMA in Microgravity , 2017 .

[5]  J. S. T'ien,et al.  Diffusion flame extinction at small stretch rates: The mechanism of radiative loss , 1986 .

[6]  Ashok T. Modak,et al.  Burning of large-scale vertical surfaces , 1977 .

[7]  Hsin-Yi Shih,et al.  Modeling wall influence on solid-fuel flame spread in a flow tunnel , 1997 .

[8]  Paul V. Ferkul,et al.  Buoyant Effects on the Flammability of Silicone Samples Planned for the Spacecraft Fire Experiment (Saffire) , 2015 .

[9]  Paul V. Ferkul,et al.  Concurrent flame growth, spread, and quenching over composite fabric samples in low speed purely forced flow in microgravity , 2017 .

[10]  V. V. Tyurenkova,et al.  Material combustion in oxidant flows: Self-similar solutions , 2016 .

[11]  James S. T'ien,et al.  Limiting Length, Steady Spread, and Nongrowing Flames in Concurrent Flow Over Solids , 2010 .

[12]  Alfredo Juarez,et al.  Selected Parametric Effects on Materials Flammability Limits , 2011 .

[13]  Paul V. Ferkul,et al.  Microgravity flammability boundary for PMMA rods in axial stagnation flow: Experimental results and energy balance analyses , 2017 .