Rewarding Policemen Increases Crime. Another Surprising Result from the Inspection Game

Inspection games are 2x2 games in which one playermust decide whether to inspect the other player, who in turnmust decide whether to infringe a norm or a regulation.Inspection games have a single, mixed strategy Nashequilibrium, which has counter-intuitive comparative staticsproperties. This result has been used by Tsebelis (1989) andHoller (1992) to show that the economic approach to lawenforcement is not likely to generate clear-cut predictions.In this paper I discuss a variant of the inspection game inwhich the inspector can act as a Stackelberg leader. I willalso show that this version of the inspection game hascounter-intuitive comparative statics properties. Inparticular, increasing inspector’s incentives to enforce thelaw increases the frequency of law infractions.

[1]  D. Fudenberg,et al.  Reputation and Equilibrium Selection in Games with a Patient Player , 1989 .

[2]  J. Bentham An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation , 1945, Princeton Readings in Political Thought.

[3]  Manfred J. Holler,et al.  Fighting pollution when decisions are strategic , 1993 .

[4]  P. Ordeshook,et al.  Crime and Punishment: Are One-Shot, Two-Person Games Enough? , 1990, American Political Science Review.

[5]  George Tsebelis,et al.  Penalty has no Impact on Crime: , 1990 .

[6]  Drew Fudenberg,et al.  Explaining Cooperatiob and Commitment in Repeated Games , 1991 .

[7]  Steven Shavell,et al.  The Economic Theory of Public Enforcement of Law , 1998 .

[8]  Richard Bellamy,et al.  On crimes and punishments and other writings , 2006 .

[9]  Nuno Garoupa The Theory of Optimal Law Enforcement , 1997 .

[10]  Donald Wittman,et al.  Nash equilibrium vs. maximin : A comparative game statics analysis , 1993 .

[11]  Eric Bennett Rasmusen,et al.  Are Equilibrium Strategies Unaffected by Incentives? , 1992 .

[12]  Leonard K. Cheng,et al.  MIXED-STRATEGY NASH EQUILIBRIUM BASED UPON EXPECTED UTILITY AND QUADRATIC UTILITY , 1995 .

[13]  George Tsebelis,et al.  The Abuse of Probability in Political Analysis: The Robinson Crusoe Fallacy , 1989, American Political Science Review.

[14]  D. Fudenberg,et al.  Maintaining a Reputation when Strategies are Imperfectly Observed , 1992 .

[15]  Gary W. Cox,et al.  A note on crime and punishment , 1994 .

[16]  Donald Wittman,et al.  Counter-intuitive results in game theory , 1985 .

[17]  George Tsebelis,et al.  Are Sanctions Effective? , 1990 .