Comparative kinetic analysis of two fungal β-glucosidases

BackgroundThe enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose is still considered as one of the main limiting steps of the biological production of biofuels from lignocellulosic biomass. It is a complex multistep process, and various kinetic models have been proposed. The cellulase enzymatic cocktail secreted by Trichoderma reesei has been intensively investigated. β-glucosidases are one of a number of cellulolytic enzymes, and catalyze the last step releasing glucose from the inhibitory cellobiose. β-glucosidase (BGL1) is very poorly secreted by Trichoderma reesei strains, and complete hydrolysis of cellulose often requires supplementation with a commercial β-glucosidase preparation such as that from Aspergillus niger (Novozymes SP188). Surprisingly, kinetic modeling of β-glucosidases lacks reliable data, and the possible differences between native T. reesei and supplemented β-glucosidases are not taken into consideration, possibly because of the difficulty of purifying BGL1.ResultsA comparative kinetic analysis of β-glucosidase from Aspergillus niger and BGL1 from Trichoderma reesei, purified using a new and efficient fast protein liquid chromatography protocol, was performed. This purification is characterized by two major steps, including the adsorption of the major cellulases onto crystalline cellulose, and a final purification factor of 53. Quantitative analysis of the resulting β-glucosidase fraction from T. reesei showed it to be 95% pure. Kinetic parameters were determined using cellobiose and a chromogenic artificial substrate. A new method allowing easy and rapid determination of the kinetic parameters was also developed. β-Glucosidase SP188 (Km = 0.57 mM; Kp = 2.70 mM) has a lower specific activity than BGL1 (Km = 0.38 mM; Kp = 3.25 mM) and is also more sensitive to glucose inhibition. A Michaelis-Menten model integrating competitive inhibition by the product (glucose) has been validated and is able to predict the β-glucosidase activity of both enzymes.ConclusionsThis article provides a useful comparison between the activity of β-glucosidases from two different fungi, and shows the importance of fully characterizing both enzymes. A Michaelis-Menten model was developed, including glucose inhibition and kinetic parameters, which were accurately determined and compared. This model can be further integrated into a cellulose hydrolysis model dissociating β-glucosidase activity from that of other cellulases. It can also help to define the optimal enzymatic cocktails for new β-glucosidase activities.

[1]  O. Singh,et al.  Bioconversion of lignocellulosic biomass: biochemical and molecular perspectives , 2008, Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology.

[2]  Jay H. Lee,et al.  Modeling cellulase kinetics on lignocellulosic substrates. , 2009, Biotechnology advances.

[3]  M. Mandels,et al.  INDUCTION OF CELLULASE IN TRICHODERMA VIRIDE AS INFLUENCED BY CARBON SOURCES AND METALS , 1957, Journal of bacteriology.

[4]  G. Jan,et al.  Comparative secretome analyses of two Trichoderma reesei RUT-C30 and CL847 hypersecretory strains , 2008, Biotechnology for biofuels.

[5]  R. E. Huber,et al.  Physical and Kinetic Properties of the Family 3 β-Glucosidase from Aspergillus niger Which Is Important for Cellulose Breakdown , 2004, The Protein Journal.

[6]  Ross D. Brown,et al.  Purification and characterization of a β‐glucosidase from Trichoderma reesei , 1987 .

[7]  John N. Saddler,et al.  Effects of sugar inhibition on cellulases and β-glucosidase during enzymatic hydrolysis of softwood substrates , 2004 .

[8]  M. Hayn,et al.  Purification and characterization of two extracellular beta-glucosidases from Trichoderma reesei. , 1992, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[9]  J. Millet,et al.  Biochemistry and genetics of cellulose degradation. , 1988 .

[10]  J. O. Baker,et al.  Isolation and characterization of two forms of β-d-glucosidase fromAspergillus niger , 1993, Applied biochemistry and biotechnology.

[11]  J. Visser,et al.  beta-glucosidases from five black Aspergillus species: study of their physico-chemical and biocatalytic properties. , 2000, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[12]  Zhao Xin,et al.  Acceleration of ethanol production from paper mill waste fiber by supplementation with β-glucosidase , 1993 .

[13]  J. Ståhlberg,et al.  Isotherms for adsorption of cellobiohydrolase I and II fromtrichoderma reesei on microcrystalline cellulose , 1997, Applied biochemistry and biotechnology.

[14]  L. Lynd,et al.  Toward an aggregated understanding of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose: Noncomplexed cellulase systems , 2004, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[15]  O. H. Lowry,et al.  Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. , 1951, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[16]  D. Gregg,et al.  Effects of sugar inhibition on cellulases and beta-glucosidase during enzymatic hydrolysis of softwood substrates. , 2004, Applied biochemistry and biotechnology.

[17]  L. Lynd,et al.  Kinetics of cellobiose hydrolysis using cellobiase composites from Ttrichoderma reesei and Aspergillus niger , 1985, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[18]  G. R. Williams An electrochemical method for measuring the activity of oxygen‐stable hæmolysins , 1957 .

[19]  C. Kubicek Release of carboxymethyl-cellulase and β-glucosidase from cell walls of Trichoderma reesei , 1981, European journal of applied microbiology and biotechnology.

[20]  Emil Ott,et al.  Cellulose and cellulose derivatives , 1954 .

[21]  U. K. Laemmli,et al.  Cleavage of Structural Proteins during the Assembly of the Head of Bacteriophage T4 , 1970, Nature.

[22]  R. F. Dekker,et al.  Kinetic, inhibition, and stability properties of a commercial beta-D-glucosidase (cellobiase) preparation from aspergillus niger and its suitability in the hydrolysis of lignocellulose. , 1986, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[23]  I. S. Pretorius,et al.  Microbial Cellulose Utilization: Fundamentals and Biotechnology , 2002, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.