AlSi7 metallic foams – aspects of material modelling for crash analysis

Metallic foam samples of matrix alloy AlSi7 have been produced and mechanically tested under quasi-static and dynamic load. Model parameters for the Deshpande–Fleck and the ABAQUS ‘crushable foam’ material model were determined covering a density of 0.3–0.8 g/cm3. Yield surface determination uses uniaxial hydrostatic compression test results, extended by tensile test results for the latter model. Strain hardening was described on the basis of uniaxial compression by fitting a Rusch model to the experimental data, deriving its parameters as function of density. The predictive capabilities of the parameterised models were evaluated using experimental data gathered for load cases characterised by superimposed uniaxial and hydrostatic compression. Analyses show good agreement between simulation and experiment. Further uniaxial compression tests performed at varying strain rates over 4 orders of magnitude revealed no significant strain rate dependency of material properties and thus qualify the material model parameters determined for crash simulation.

[1]  Mamoru Mabuchi,et al.  Experimental study of energy absorption in a close-celled aluminum foam under dynamic loading , 1999 .

[2]  K. C. Rusch Load–compression behavior of flexible foams , 1969 .

[3]  Reimund Neugebauer,et al.  Machine Tools With Metal Foams , 2006 .

[4]  Noboru Kikuchi,et al.  Constitutive Modeling and Material Characterization of Polymeric Foams , 1997 .

[5]  M. Thompson,et al.  Density gradient effects on aluminium foam compression behaviour , 1997 .

[6]  M. Avalle,et al.  High strain-rate compression test on metallic foam using a multiple pulse SHPB Apparatus , 2006 .

[7]  N. Fleck,et al.  High strain rate compressive behaviour of aluminium alloy foams , 2000 .

[8]  H. Schreyer,et al.  ANISOTROPIC PLASTICITY MODEL FOR FOAMS AND HONEYCOMBS , 1994 .

[9]  John Banhart,et al.  Properties of heat-treated aluminium foams , 2003 .

[10]  K. C. Rusch Energy‐absorbing characteristics of foamed polymers , 1970 .

[11]  M. Wolcott Cellular solids: Structure and properties , 1990 .

[12]  Mustafa Güden,et al.  Crushing of aluminum closed cell foams: density and strain rate effects , 2000 .

[13]  U. Ramamurty,et al.  Strain rate sensitivity of a closed-cell aluminum foam , 2000 .

[14]  Massimiliano Avalle,et al.  Mechanical Models of Cellular Solids, Parameters Identification from Experimental Tests , 2005 .

[15]  J. Banhart Manufacture, characterisation and application of cellular metals and metal foams , 2001 .

[16]  L. Gibson,et al.  Size effects in ductile cellular solids. Part II : experimental results , 2001 .

[17]  K. C. Rusch Load-compression behavior of brittle foams , 1970 .

[18]  Michael F. Ashby,et al.  Cellular metals and metal foaming technology , 2001 .

[19]  N. Fleck,et al.  Isotropic constitutive models for metallic foams , 2000 .

[20]  O. Hopperstad,et al.  Validation of constitutive models applicable to aluminium foams , 2002 .

[21]  H.-W. Seeliger,et al.  Aluminium Foam Sandwich (AFS) Ready for Market Introduction , 2004 .

[22]  M. Ashby,et al.  Cellular solids: Structure & properties , 1988 .

[23]  On the influence of meso-inhomogeneities on the crush worthiness of metal foams , 1998 .

[24]  James Lankford,et al.  High strain rate compression of closed-cell aluminium foams , 2000 .

[25]  Ronald E. Miller A continuum plasticity model for the constitutive and indentation behaviour of foamed metals , 2000 .