Stable EEG Spatiospectral Sources Using Relative Power as Group-ICA Input

Within the last decade, various blind source separation algorithms (BSS) isolating distinct EEG oscillations were derived and implemented. Group Independent Component Analysis (group-ICA) is a promising tool for decomposing spatiospectral EEG maps across multiple subjects. However, researchers are faced with many preprocessing options prior to performing group-ICA, which potentially influences the results. To examine the influence of preprocessing steps, within this article we compare results derived from group-ICA using the absolute power of spatiospectral maps and the relative power of spatiospectral maps. Within a previous study, we used K-means clustering to demonstrate group-ICA of absolute power spatiospectral maps generates sources which are stable across different paradigms (i.e. resting-state, semantic decision, visual oddball) Within the current study, we compare these maps with those obtained using relative power of spatiospectral maps as input to group-ICA. We find that relative EEG power contains 10 stable spatiospectral patterns which were similar to those observed using absolute power as inputs. Interestingly, relative power revealed two γ-band (20–40 Hz) patterns which were present across 3 paradigms, but not present using absolute power. This finding suggests that relative power potentially emphasizes low energy signals which are obscured by the high energy low frequency which dominates absolute power measures.

[1]  Aapo Hyvärinen,et al.  Validating the independent components of neuroimaging time series via clustering and visualization , 2004, NeuroImage.

[2]  René J. Huster,et al.  A Tutorial Review on Multi-subject Decomposition of EEG , 2017, Brain Topography.

[3]  Robert Turner,et al.  A Method for Removing Imaging Artifact from Continuous EEG Recorded during Functional MRI , 2000, NeuroImage.

[4]  Michal Mikl,et al.  Stable Scalp EEG Spatiospectral Patterns Across Paradigms Estimated by Group ICA , 2017, Brain Topography.

[5]  G. Buzsáki Rhythms of the brain , 2006 .

[6]  Michal Mikl,et al.  Generalized EEG-FMRI spectral and spatiospectral heuristic models , 2016, 2016 IEEE 13th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI).

[7]  D. Lehmann,et al.  Segmentation of brain electrical activity into microstates: model estimation and validation , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Hemodynamic correlates of EEG: A heuristic , 2005, NeuroImage.

[9]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  The spatiospectral characterization of brain networks: Fusing concurrent EEG spectra and fMRI maps , 2013, NeuroImage.

[10]  Louis Lemieux,et al.  Identification of EEG Events in the MR Scanner: The Problem of Pulse Artifact and a Method for Its Subtraction , 1998, NeuroImage.

[11]  Radek Mareček,et al.  Exploring task-related variability in fMRI data using fluctuations in power spectrum of simultaneously acquired EEG , 2015, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[12]  W. Klimesch EEG alpha and theta oscillations reflect cognitive and memory performance: a review and analysis , 1999, Brain Research Reviews.